Re: debian.org e-mail address and SPF/SRS

2004-11-04 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Osamu Aoki | If you know easy way to avoid this problem exists, please let me know. | (Changing ISP is certainly an option.) Use BSTMP to gluck. (If your ISP can't be whacked into turning it off/Implementing yahoo's DomainKeys proposal, which looks fairly sane to me; http://antispam.yahoo.com

Re: debian.org e-mail address and SPF/SRS

2004-11-04 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 09:59:44AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Osamu Aoki > > | If you know easy way to avoid this problem exists, please let me know. > | (Changing ISP is certainly an option.) > > Use BSTMP to gluck. > > (If your ISP can't be whacked into turning it off/Implementing yaho

Re: debian.org e-mail address and SPF/SRS

2004-11-04 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Matthew Palmer | Uhm, having just read through the supplied URL, I can't agree with the | sanity of the proposal. | It appears to require that headers not be modified at all in transit | (which means that forwarding becomes impossible), Uhm, which headers are modified by a forwarding agent?

Re: Documentation on handling of orig.tar.gz files for Developer's Reference or for Debian Policy

2004-11-04 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 08:07:25PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Hi Bill, hi all, > > I'd like to come back to one point of your mail: > > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you have a whole directory of binary files, you might consider > > making a new source package for them. (F

Re: debian.org e-mail address and SPF/SRS

2004-11-04 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:15:19AM +0100, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 47 lines which said: > If you know easy way to avoid this problem exists, please let me > know. I remail my email from debian.org machines, I do not forward it. So, I do not have the problem (I have oth

Re: debian.org e-mail address and SPF/SRS

2004-11-04 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Matthew Palmer > | Uhm, having just read through the supplied URL, I can't agree with the > | sanity of the proposal. > > | It appears to require that headers not be modified at all in transit > | (which means that forwarding be

Bug#279654: ITP: coaster -- A disc burning interface for Gnome.

2004-11-04 Thread Sean Harshbarger
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: coaster Version : 0.1.1 Upstream Author : Bryan Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sean Harshbarger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.coaster-burn.org/ * License : GP

Re: Updated SELinux Release

2004-11-04 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:02:35AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 21:15:38 -0500, Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 19:21 +, Dhruv Gami wrote: > >> Personally, i would prefer to have those two tarballs available. I > >> know most people

Synching mirrors and clients (was: Re: apt-proxy v2 and rsync)

2004-11-04 Thread Otto Wyss
> > Can anyone explain why rsync is no longer considered an appropriate > > method for fetching Packages files? > > IIRC the problem is that rsync is quite CPU-heavy on the servers, so while > the mirrors have the (network) resources to feed downloads to 100s of > users, they don't have the (CPU)

[sds@epoch.ncsc.mil: Re: Updated SELinux Release]

2004-11-04 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
- Forwarded message from Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 16:37:30 + X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Subject: Re: Updated SELinux Release From: Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [E

Re: Synching mirrors and clients (was: Re: apt-proxy v2 and rsync)

2004-11-04 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 05:46:55PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote: > > Now if you feel advantous, repack as many package on the source mirror > with gzip --rsyncable and notice the difference. Exactly how is this going to help? I can only see this as being useful when the files change. Files should nev

My fan is out of control - Help!!

2004-11-04 Thread "Muñoz Palominos, César Augusto"
With my computer, when it is turned on, there will be a loud whirring noise during the BIOS loading and when Windows XP starts loading. But when I get to the login screen for Windows XP, the whirring stops.   While running linux (Debian, Red Hat, Suse, Knoppix, etc), however, the whirrin

Re: My fan is out of control - Help!!

2004-11-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 04 novembre 2004 à 11:38 -0600, "Muñoz Palominos, César Augusto" a écrit : > With my computer, when it is turned on, there will be a loud whirring > noise during the BIOS loading and when Windows XP starts loading. But > when I get to the login screen for Windows XP, the whirring stops. >

Re: Synching mirrors and clients (was: Re: apt-proxy v2 and rsync)

2004-11-04 Thread Wouter Verhelst,,,
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 06:35:40PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 05:46:55PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote: > > > > Now if you feel advantous, repack as many package on the source mirror > > with gzip --rsyncable and notice the difference. > > Exactly how is this going to help? I c

Re: Synching mirrors and clients (was: Re: apt-proxy v2 and rsync)

2004-11-04 Thread Robert Lemmen
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 06:35:40PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Now if you feel advantous, repack as many package on the source mirror > > with gzip --rsyncable and notice the difference. > > Exactly how is this going to help? I can only see this as being > useful when the files change. Files s

Re: Alioth Project Denied

2004-11-04 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 11:31:09AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Your project registration for Alioth has been denied. > > Project Full Name: Window Maker Debian Package > Project Unix Name: wmaker > > Reasons for negative decision: > > If you decide to use an alioth project to com

Re: debian.org e-mail address and SPF/SRS

2004-11-04 Thread Paul Hampson
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 10:37:08PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > * Matthew Palmer > > | Uhm, having just read through the supplied URL, I can't agree with the > > | sanity of the proposal. > > | It appears to require that heade

Re: debian.org e-mail address and SPF/SRS

2004-11-04 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 10:37:08PM +1100, Matthew Palmer said > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > It gives you traceability and it can be used to prevent joe-jobs. > > It's not a silver bullet solution against spam. > > And yet it's being touted as one. I predic

Re: Updated SELinux Release

2004-11-04 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 13:15 +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > default: no. Why not on by default, with a targeted policy, for everyone? SELinux's flexibility allows one to easily turn it off for specific services. There's a lot of value in preventing a compromised or misconfigured sy

Re: Documentation on handling of orig.tar.gz files for Developer's Reference or for Debian Policy

2004-11-04 Thread Chris Cheney
Why doesn't dpkg use the -a flag to diff? Chris

Re: debian.org e-mail address and SPF/SRS

2004-11-04 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 03:15:09PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 10:37:08PM +1100, Matthew Palmer said > > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > > It gives you traceability and it can be used to prevent joe-jobs. > > > It's not a silver bullet solut

Re: Updated SELinux Release

2004-11-04 Thread Andres Salomon
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:15:44 +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:02:35AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 21:15:38 -0500, Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> > On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 19:21 +, Dhruv Gami wrote: >> >> Personally