On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 10:37:08PM +1100, Matthew Palmer said > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > It gives you traceability and it can be used to prevent joe-jobs. > > It's not a silver bullet solution against spam. > > And yet it's being touted as one. I predict that the effect of this system > on spam levels will be about as detectable on a spam vs time graph as a fart > in a hurricane.
I'm not sure why it's being touted as one; SPF has the same issue. Encouraging adoption of something by misrepresenting its use seems rather pointless in the end. -rob -- Words of the day: BCCI offensive information warfare JPL undercover Mena Etacs
