On Tuesday 20 May 2003 15:22, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> (Of course, this still doesn't answer the question of whether anyone
> would ever want or use locale support to be enabled during the initial
> boot sequence, such that the boot messages come up in the local
> language)
You don't have a dad
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sigcperl
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Ron Steinke
* URL : http://sigcperl.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : Helper library for the libsigc++ Perl
* Brian May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030521 02:35]:
> On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:00:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > The policy vetoe to symlinking intends (in my interpretation) two
> > goals. One is to ensure that the licences don't "change" unintendidly.
> > This could e.g. happen if there is a
On Tuesday 20 May 2003 14:22, Andreas Tille wrote:
[snipped warning]
> I wanted to show this here to ask for opinions whether this is a bug in the
> libdb3++-dev header files. I regard it not to be related to the problem
> but I think we should fix this anyway. Should I file a wishlist bug report
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sigc
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Ron Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sigcperl.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : Perl bindings to the li
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 05:58:10PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Scenario B:
>
> Consider the case where the quorum is 45, and there have been
> 44 votes -- 23 for, 21 against. (Only one option on the ballot). I am
> opposed to the option.
>
> At this point; under my version; I
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
> But you cannot know what the situation is, unless you have insider
> knowledge
A situation where a vote would be successful, but fail for lack of
participation, often requires no insider knowledge at all to be recognizeable
as such. In that situation, the opponents can
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:12:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> But you cannot know what the situation is, unless you have insider
> knowledge, the votes are secrets, and the results published only after
> the election is closed.
This doesn't change the fact that there is a chance that by voting
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:09:43AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> Hi,
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > But you cannot know what the situation is, unless you have insider
> > knowledge
>
> A situation where a vote would be successful, but fail for lack of
> participat
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
> If there is such a lack of participation that even our low quorum
> requirement is not meet, then is this a bad thing ?
Yes -- because it encourages people not to vote in that situation.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Discla
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 07:27:21PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> Here, the vote(s) for B caused A to win.
>
> Other examples are possible (for example: 19 ABD, 1 BDA).
>
> > > To make your proposal work right, we'd need a separate quorum
> > > determination phase which is independent of the voting
Hiya Debian,
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 03:24:54PM -0500, michael d. ivey wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that Debian Wiki (http://wiki.debian.net) is
> back online, and should stay that way.
[..]
Am I missing something or is there no diff/version control functionality?
Does this mean there is no v
Hello,
Afaict after qt3 has entered testing avifile could go there
finally too:
| trying: avifile
| skipped: avifile (0 <- 241)
| got: 386+0: a-88:a-91:h-79:i-128
| * i386: avifile-xvid-plugin
which http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=avifile translates to:
| Checking avifile
|
Hi,
Nick Phillips wrote:
> If a winning option would be discarded due to quorum requirements, then
> I think the vote should probably be considered void.
That seems to be the best choice.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was sele
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ehnt
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.some.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : Extreme Happy Ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
as I've no longer time to properly maintain my packages I'm
searching for a new maintainer for:
Package: ntop
Description: display network usage in top-like format
ntop is a Network Top program. It displays a summary of network
usage
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What do we get from that sponsor? Conference rooms, network, accomodation,
> food, flights and tshirts?
His response:
} We would provide the conference facilities and try to get accomodations with
} some LUG members. There may be more, but I need to
On Wed 21 May 2003, Craig small wrote:
>
> * Package name: ehnt
> Version : x.y.z
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.some.org/
> * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
> Description : Extreme Happy Netflow Tool - Obtains u
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Dennis Schoen wrote:
> Package: apt-show-source
> Description: Shows source-package information
> This program parses the APT lists for source packages and the
> dpkg status file and then lists every package with a different
> version number than the one installed.
> It's
W liście z wto, 20-05-2003, godz. 05:52, Eric Dorland pisze:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> From the amount of mail I've gotten I guess people will be
> interested. I've uploaded mozilla-firebird_0.6-1 to my personal apt
> repository at http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/. Just add:
To avoid confustion a
Sorry for replying to my own message. :)
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 01:42:32PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
> Package: apt-show-source
> Description: Shows source-package information
> This program parses the APT lists for source packages and the
> dpkg status file and then lists every package with
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:28:32AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> Hiya Debian,
Hiya! =)
> Am I missing something or is there no diff/version control
> functionality? Does this mean there is no version control of pages or
> just that it's hidden from users?
Stock Kwiki 0.13 doesn't have anything.
> Package: ntop
> Description: display network usage in top-like format
> ntop is a Network Top program. It displays a summary of network
> usage by machines on your network in a format reminiscent of the
> unix top utility.
> .
> It can also be run in web mode, which allows the display to be
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:22:03AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Uhm ... what about shipping a separate library libdebtags? It seems to
> me a good way to share the C code you mention in a previous mail and
> also a good way to avoid future incompatibility if you decide to change
> the format
Hello
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 01:42:32PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> as I've no longer time to properly maintain my packages I'm
> searching for a new maintainer for:
>
> Package: ntop
> Description: display network usage i
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 09:57:13PM +1200, Nick Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 07:27:21PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> > Here, the vote(s) for B caused A to win.
> > Other examples are possible (for example: 19 ABD, 1 BDA).
> > > > To make your proposal work right, we'd need a separate
> On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 05:58:10PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > At this point; under my version; I can express my opinions
> > with no fear of harming my candidate. Under your amendment; if I do
> > not vote; the vote is nullified. However, if I vote against the
> > option -- the opt
On Wed, 21 May 2003 21:57:13 +1200, Nick Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 07:27:21PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
>> Here, the vote(s) for B caused A to win.
>>
>> Other examples are possible (for example: 19 ABD, 1 BDA).
>>
>> > > To make your proposal work right, we'd n
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 09:57:13PM +1200, Nick Phillips wrote:
> I don't believe that it's acceptable for an otherwise beaten option
> to win due the the otherwise winning option being discarded due
> to a quorum requirement, as John suggests might happen.
Under the proposed system, we would do ex
On Tue, 20 May 2003, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > i believe that it looks nicer keeping the layout coherent across
> > translation.
>
> But you do not explain why!
because it looks nicer and it is coherent with the original one. This was
always what i told along the thread. I tought it was clear ;)
On Tue, 20 May 2003, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > We asked why the removal of the number «3» from the word «PHP3» caused
> > the format of the whole description to the changed. We asked _why_,
> > we did not say «do not do this». First, we wanted to know why. Then,
> > we might want to ask
On Mon, 19 May 2003, Martin Quinson wrote:
> Internationalizing, translating and being internationalized and translated
[SNIP]
I think that having atleast some references on how to handle translations
will avoid other flamewars and misunderstandigs.
But atleast the flamewar was not completly use
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dpkg-rebuild
Version : Will be 0.1
Upstream Author : Patrick Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cs.duke.edu/~reynolds/projects/dpkg-rebuild
* License : GPL
> > Package: ntop
>
> I'd like to take this one. I have been using it for a long time and
> is quite experienced with the code.
-> Dennis: I think Ola is better than me for this package (since I
have not much experience with ntop code), forget my offer.
Frederic
* (Aaron M. Ucko)
| Two of the people I originally contacted said this too, but always in
| the third person. I ask again, who on this list actually still feels
| this way?
As other people have said: I'm not going, but I don't object to a
conference in the US per se.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:05:47AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi,
>
> If the "winning" option is discarded due to quorum requirements, then
> given that all non-default options have the *same* quorum requirement,
> this is exactly what would happen.
>
I think this is not inherently true. Sinc
On Wed, 21 May 2003, michael d. ivey wrote:
>
> It'll be in, either by upstream or by me, within a few weeks. I want to
> see what he comes up with, and then I'll hack something for us.
Why not starting with phpwiki ? We are using it on various
high-volume site, this is quite stab
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 07:07:27PM +0200, Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote:
> Why not starting with phpwiki ? We are using it on various
> high-volume site, this is quite stable and got a lot features and
> don't eat the memory like... (you know ;-)
I'd really like to not have the "Why no
Raul Miller wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 09:57:13PM +1200, Nick Phillips wrote:
I don't believe that it's acceptable for an otherwise beaten option
to win due the the otherwise winning option being discarded due
to a quorum requirement, as John suggests might happen.
Under the proposed sy
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 09:34:37AM -0500, michael d. ivey wrote:
> Stock Kwiki 0.13 doesn't have anything. Our local version has a basic
> RCS checkin
dont want to argue here, but there are enough Wikis which do support that.
PErsonally I use Tavi (mysql) which is only missing file uploads.
Gree
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 06:33:51PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> * Package name: dpkg-rebuild
> Description : Rebuild dpkg's status file.
>
> Rebuild the Debian '/var/lib/dpkg/status' file from information in
> '/var/lib/dpkg/available' and '/var/lib/dpkg/info/*.list'. This is
> usef
Josip Rodin (2003-05-20 23:21:02 +0200) :
> On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:06:17PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
[...]
>> No because alioth has its own DNS delegation (in order to manage
>> .alioth.debian.org).
>
> But why doesn't it have any slaves?
That's a good question. The Sourceforge and Gforg
reopen 192068
thanks
John O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:40:18 +0100
> Source: ptkei
> Binary: ptkei
> Architecture: source all
> Version: 1.18.0-4
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: John O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changed
Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 17:31:23 +0200
> Source: directory-administrator
> Binary: directory-administrator
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 1.3.5-1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Grzegorz B. Prokopski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> W li?cie z wto, 20-05-2003, godz. 05:52, Eric Dorland pisze:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > From the amount of mail I've gotten I guess people will be
> > interested. I've uploaded mozilla-firebird_0.6-1 to my personal apt
> > repository at http://pe
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:24:42PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> John O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Changes:
> > ptkei (1.18.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* Fixed Bug#192068
>
> ...another fine example of changelog abuse.
... although not what actually closed the bug; he
* Brian Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > From the amount of mail I've gotten I guess people will be
> > interested. I've uploaded mozilla-firebird_0.6-1 to my personal apt
> > repository at http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian
Hi,
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 05:03:47PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 01:42:32PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote:
> > Package: ntop
> > Description: display network usage in top-like format
> > ntop is a Network Top program. It displays a summary of network
> > usage by machine
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> >* New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276)
>
> Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if all 3 of these bugs were
> requests for a new version, which they were not.
to me it reads: "fixed by the new version"
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > directory-administrator (1.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276)
>
> Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if all 3 of these bugs were
> requests for a new versi
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:47:52PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > >* New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276)
> >
> > Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if all 3 of these bugs were
> > requests for a ne
Could you be more specific? If there's a permission problem I'd like
to fix it :)
* Andreas Happe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> > I've installed a bunch of extensions while using root and now Mozilla
> > Firebird hangs when starting it a
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:55:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> It's much more helpful to write this as:
yes of course, but the question is where the line between helpfulness and
usefulness is :)
At least I think it is not a good idea to talk about "abuse" if maintainers
save themself some work.
Are any arches other than debian ppc sid
seeing the new mozilla 1.3.1-1 release segfault?
This new version also causes galeon to segfault
as well. Regressing back to 1.3-5 fixes both.
Jack
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 01:25:47PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number of
> > non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil, due in
> > part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the app
Thus spake Eric Dorland:
> Could you be more specific? If there's a permission problem I'd like
> to fix it :)
I've seen this happen when installing extensions, such as the tabbrowser
extensions... the .jar file gets installed with 400 permissions, which
can be Ok if you're installing it locally,
56 matches
Mail list logo
