On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 10:11:48PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Maybe the maintainer just has no clue about how UTF should work in
> that particular application and can't do much about it other than wait
> until upstream has a clue and implements it.
I'm in this position, I'm upstream and mai
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 04:30:54PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > What would a Debian Usability project do?
> What about looking at the new installer, and give suggestions to how
> it can be made easier to understand and user for new users?
Good one. As you can probably see, I'm pretty bu
Hi,
I have updated my unstable box but my address auto completion does not work
anymore in mozilla. Can anyone reproduce this ? It is annoying me as hell.
Tnx,
Bastiaan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donald Spoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can confirm that it does break cupsys-driver-gimpprint and
> foomatic-bin because I missed this message, and my CUPS printing
> system quit working on about 16 Apr. These remain broken as of 20 Apr
> 2003.
From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:17:15 +0200
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 05:53:09PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
>
> > The current texmf.cnf of Debian is completely the same as the one
> > ups
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cl-units
Version : 2003.04.18
Upstream Author : Gordon S. Novak Jr.
* URL : http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/novak/units.html
* License : GPL
Description : Common Lisp package
From: Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:23:26 +0100
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 05:53:09PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > So you do not understand the value
On Monday 21 April 2003 03:29 pm, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Am I missing something?
Only the fact that, as Debian maintainer, you do not have the right to decide
which files Debian users may or may not edit. Policy says they can do as
they like, regardless if you like it or your packages care for
At 8:31 am, Tuesday, April 22 2003, Bastiaan Naber mumbled:
> I have updated my unstable box but my address auto completion does not work
> anymore in mozilla. Can anyone reproduce this ? It is annoying me as hell.
>
Ditto. I did the annoying switch to mozilla-snapshot where completion works,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> On Monday 21 April 2003 03:29 pm, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Am I missing something?
>
> Only the fact that, as Debian maintainer, you do not have the right to decide
> which files Debian users may or may not edit. Policy says they can do as
> they like,
> > I have updated my unstable box but my address auto completion does not
> > work
> > anymore in mozilla. Can anyone reproduce this ? It is annoying me as hell.
> >
> Ditto. I did the annoying switch to mozilla-snapshot where completion works,
> and Mozilla actually keeps accepting keyboard
>> Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In this case, administrator should modify TEXINPUTS.latex in
> /etc/texmf/texmf.d/45TeXinputs.cnf and run update-texmf once.
> Generated texmf.cnf should be the same as an old one.
What makes you think that special casing the Debian installation
On Monday 21 April 2003 04:24 pm, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> > On Monday 21 April 2003 03:29 pm, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > > Am I missing something?
> >
> > Only the fact that, as Debian maintainer, you do not have the right to
> > decide which files Debian users
Roger Leigh wrote:
-SNIP- <
I'll be uploading new cupsys-driver-gimpprint packages in a few days,
once I've rebuilt and fully tested it. In the mean-time, installing
libcupsimage2 should make it work again.
Regards,
Roger
It works as stated with the current cupsys-driver-gimpprint from SID!
Tha
From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 01:45:07 +0200
> >> Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > In this case, administrator should modify TEXINPUTS.latex in
> > /etc/texmf/texmf.d/45TeXin
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 02:44, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:25:11 +0400, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I want the same visibility of credits for reiserfs that movies give
> > for their actors.
>
> Now imagine if ls or grep wanted the list of contributors to
> be s
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Steve Greenland wrote:
> If you have a package that is asking only medium and lower priority
> debconf questions, then debconf should not be used at all.
I (apparently incorrectly) presumed that debconf was also intended to
allow for the eventual automation of replicated Debia
[subscribed to -legal, not to -devel; Cc: accordingly]
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 01:24:09AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op za 19-04-2003, om 22:51 schreef Lukas Geyer:
> > the issue seems to be the fix of #152547. If we are not allowed to
> > remove a screenful of advertising from the output of
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:03:00 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Okay, I guessed that the old /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf was a conffile but
> the current one is a configuration file so it's okay only reserving
> the old file as texmf.cnf.dpkg-old and explain how to migrate to the
>
Keep in mind you're talking to a bunch of people who are amoung the
staunchest free software advocates around. Unlike you, most of them make
$0 for all their contributions. Your implication that we're somehow
profiting from the removal of credits is ludicrous. In any case, there is
already a wid
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 07:58:10 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> From: Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#189370:
> acknowledged by developer (irrelevant) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003
> 11:23:26 +0100
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 05:53:09PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Don Armstrong writes:
> I (apparently incorrectly) presumed that debconf was also intended to
> allow for the eventual automation of replicated Debian installations.
I distinctly remember reading exactly that.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:36:01 +0200, Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I wondered whether this use of ucf is safe. If postinst fails for
> any reason, and package is reconfigured, the backup file is
> overwritten. An alternative is to abort postinst if -old already
> exists, and to remov
On Sat, 2003-04-19 at 23:41, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> 1. Is software licensed in the manner Hans intends DFSG-free? That is,
> is it DFSG-free to require that interactive programs output a full
NON-interactive programs. mkreiserfs is not interactive. It is passed
arguments on the command line, mak
On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 22:45:59 -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 06:54:42AM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
>> It is really a question of, do you respect the authors?
>
> Who do you respect, Hans? Many Debian Developers are also Free
> Software authors. How much respect are you sh
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 12:25:39PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> "We don't care what the author wants, we have the legal right to
> change what we like" is not a good message to send. Even if you don't
Thankfully, Debian isn't sending this message.
Hans would apparently like people to believe that
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 12:12:56AM +0200, Bastiaan Naber wrote:
> I have updated my unstable box but my address auto completion does
> not work anymore in mozilla. Can anyone reproduce this ? It is
> annoying me as hell.
It seems that a "deeper" problem -- that of history information not
being s
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
