Re: How to get rid of non-free packers?

2002-08-27 Thread Brian May
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:53:27PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: > > Ideally, amavis needs access for all archive formats so it can check > > for viruses in E-Mail... > > You mean it must be able to UNpack those packed files attached to E-Mail? Yes. > > > P.S: I don't subscribe to mailing-lis

Re: Accepted libmime-base64-perl 2.12-4.1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Joey Hess
Anthony Fok wrote: > Format: 1.7 > Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:24:09 +0800 > Source: libmime-base64-perl > Binary: libmime-base64-perl > Architecture: source i386 > Version: 2.12-4.1 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: high > Maintainer: Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Changed-By: Anthony F

New package netfilter-init to experimental?

2002-08-27 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, where I work, I have developed a framework to flexibly initialize netfilter packet filter rules called netfilter-init. We install it from a debian file, and the code is licensed GPL. It currently does what we need, but that is not enough for a package in Debian. The package is currently lacki

Re: Convenient way to enable IDE DMA

2002-08-27 Thread Chris Halls
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:11:18PM -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote: > The other question is how it should be enabled. One way is "hdparm -d 1 > /dev/hd?" or moral equivalent in an init script. The hwtools package includes a script with a placeholder for such hdparm tuning in /etc/init.d/hwtools: #

Re: DMA, ide-scsi, devfs by default

2002-08-27 Thread Colin Walters
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 00:43, Miles Bader wrote: > What's especially cool is that it hardwires the British (or Australian, > in this case, I guess) spelling of `disc' as part of the UI The idea that devfs hardwires anything seems to be very popular. It is also completely wrong. You can use the u

Re: DMA, ide-scsi, devfs by default

2002-08-27 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What's especially cool is that it hardwires the British (or Australian, > in this case, I guess) spelling of `disc' as part of the UI, though > `disk' seems far more widespread in the rest of the kernel (consistency, > what's that?) In American Englis

Re: DMA, ide-scsi, devfs by default

2002-08-27 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:43:05PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > But if it is reliable i would recommend using it. It makes lot of things > > much easier and probably is much more intuitive for beginners as well. > > (just thinking of /dev/discs/disc0/pa

招聘业务人员

2002-08-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(本信件是广告信件,不满意请删除,对你的打搅表示歉意) 您好: 潍坊企业信息网因业务拓展的需要,现面向社会招聘市场营销人员10名,网页制作人员2名。联系电话:8583256,8708575 联系人:窦先生、季小姐 E_mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 祝: 万事如意! 潍坊企业信息网 200

Re: Migration to /usr/share/doc

2002-08-27 Thread Yenar Calentaure
Giorgio Mandolfo wrote: Hi everybody. This may be quite stupid or frivolous. :-) I have noticed the migration of the extra documentation files from /usr/doc/ to /usr/share/doc/ (as also describes the Debian Policy chapter 13.3). I am trying not to use exclusively the simbolic link to /usr/share/d

Re: unsubscribe mikael.petersson@lovelace.d2g.nu

2002-08-27 Thread Gerd Flaig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gerd Flaig Technik[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bei Schlund + Partner AG

Re: Sharp SPAM [marketing@sharpsystems.com: Special Price Offer for Select Sharp Systems Products]

2002-08-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 06:32:40PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote: > It appears that Sharp Systems systematically spammed writers to the > Debian-Laptop list, which certainly is an abuse of the debian lists. While your message seems perfectly valid per se, why are you spamming debian-devel with it? :

Re: Migration to /usr/share/doc

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 27.08.02 um 09:41:50 schrieb Yenar Calentaure: > Just hit instead of tab, one keystroke isn't THAT much :). > Renameing the directory could solve your problem, but is it worth one > keystroke per typing /usr/share/doc/whatever? Yes, it is worth it. I often use docs, I often use the completio

Re: DMA, ide-scsi, devfs by default

2002-08-27 Thread Joseph Carter
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:03:39AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > What's especially cool is that it hardwires the British (or Australian, > > in this case, I guess) spelling of `disc' as part of the UI, though > > `disk' seems far more widespread in the rest of the kernel (consistency, > >

Re: How to get rid of non-free packers?

2002-08-27 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:50:58PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:23:30 -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > It looks like Arai-san [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be most active. > > http://ns103.net/~arai is his URL > > > > He has new autoconf version. > > > > It looks to me people ar

Re: Migration to /usr/share/doc

2002-08-27 Thread Richard Braakman
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:48:13AM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Perhaps I should use /usr/doc/ instead. Even shorter... I have been a happy man since I made a /doc symlink. Richard Braakman

PHP4 + Oracle

2002-08-27 Thread Sobkowiak Krzysztof
Hallo I need to use oracle with php4 on Debian? How can I do it? Could somebody [help me] build php4-oracle package? Thanks K. Sobkowiak

Re: unsubscribe mikael.petersson@lovelace.d2g.nu

2002-08-27 Thread Gerd Flaig
Gerd Flaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ unsubsribe instructions ] sorry, that wasn't meant to got to the list. The mail2news gate mangles the reply-to header and I was a little tired this morning so I didn't notice that it went to the list instead of the original poster until a kind person poi

testing script

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Meskes
Hi, I was just told the script updating testing doesn't run at the moment. Is that true? If so, is there a reason? Are we already in freeze? :-) Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael@Fam-Meskes.De Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

Re: New package netfilter-init to experimental?

2002-08-27 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Marc Haber wrote: > machine takes seven minutes to build a new rule set. It is so slow > because everything is implemented as shell scripts. There are plans to > convert the significant part of code to C++ and to use iptables > --restore to establish the rule set instead of iss

OpenLDAP with TLS support

2002-08-27 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi *, For those who don't read long mails: Please test the ldap packages at http://www.ifg.uni-kiel.de/~torsten/preview/ I am about to upload new openldap packages with TLS support as requested frequently. Since it seems like in the short run there will be no libssl0.9.6 in base (or ex

联系

2002-08-27 Thread Micros
Title: iboss2000   office2000理财系列软件  ――― (office2000增值产品) 系统消息:本站承接对软件的个性化定制工作,质优价廉,欢迎垂询。   office2000财务系统v2.5   详细介绍    下载软件 注册>> office2000老板理财v1.2   详细介绍    下载软件 注册>>             版权所有:太阳雨软件设计室    联系我们

Re: New package netfilter-init to experimental?

2002-08-27 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:47:41 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes: >Well, have a look on ipmasq, it uses shell scripts, and I find it to be >"fast enough"... ipmasq is very nice, but it *is* a bit slow on my sparcstation 1+. (now don't get me wrong: almost everything is, on that box) an alte

Re: OpenLDAP with TLS support

2002-08-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:42:27 +0200 Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - There is libldap2-tls with TLS built in which can be installed on top > of libldap2. It diverts the libraries without TLS and replaces them > with the TLS supporting libs > > Most of this work was done by Rol

How to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your debian/rules

2002-08-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On 27 Aug 2002 13:03:15 +0100 Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It should probably be LD_LIBRARY_PATH=whatever:$${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > > Even better, something like > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}whatever. > > It's generally not desirable to introduce null path

[ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Igor Genibel
Hi all, I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your packages such as: - the pts related page about packages (Thanks a lot to Raphaël

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Dennis Schoen
Hi Igor, On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > > I waiting for you comments, advices, insults or other things. Many thanks for you

Re: Bug#158459: How to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your debian/rules

2002-08-27 Thread Carlos O'Donell
> > > It should probably be LD_LIBRARY_PATH=whatever:$${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > > Even better, something like > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}whatever. > > It's generally not desirable to introduce null path components into > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH if it was unset before, see #152099

Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Chanop Silpa-Anan
Hola amigos, Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages properly. So here are packages up for adoption : coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, muttprint, type1inst, freefont, and

Re: Bug#158459: How to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your debian/rules

2002-08-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:36:09 -0400 "Carlos O'Donell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It should probably be LD_LIBRARY_PATH=whatever:$${LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > > > Even better, something like > > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:}whatever. > > > It's generally not desirable to in

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:24:57 +0200 Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); > - the broken dependencies for each branch (stable, testing, unstable). This is simply, great. Good work! It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any l

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this? Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349 Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349 ... Loo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I wasn't watching. Thanks! I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Decklin Foster
Igor Genibel writes: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. Other

Re: apt-get wants to upgrade package to same version?

2002-08-27 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 06:21, Brian May wrote: > I suspect this is a more general problem with apt-get that it assumes > that if two versions of the same package are available from different > sources, then both packages will be exactly the same. As such, it will > always use the Packages entry fro

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
Il mar, 2002-08-27 alle 14:50, Chanop Silpa-Anan ha scritto: > Hola amigos, > > > Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages > properly. So here are packages up for adoption : > > coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, > libdc1394-8, libdc1394-

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: > Igor Genibel writes: > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a

Re: OpenLDAP with TLS support

2002-08-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:18:43PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:42:27 +0200 > Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - There is libldap2-tls with TLS built in which can be installed on top > > of libldap2. It diverts the libraries without TLS and replaces them

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Jérôme Marant
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: > > Igor Genibel writes: > > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having versio

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Igor, On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit buttons for each of

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi all, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote: > Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages > properly. So here are packages up for adoption : > > coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, > libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, > muttp

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Igor Genibel
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:11:40PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I > wasn't watching. Thanks! Thanks a lot to. > I notice one slight glitch; following a PTS link to a lib* package takes > you to e.g. http://pts.debian.net/l/libfilte

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: > Igor Genibel writes: > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in > stable and testing, but there is no such version of that

Re: testing script

2002-08-27 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:40:09PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > I was just told the script updating testing doesn't run at the moment. > Is that true? If so, is there a reason? Are we already in freeze? :-) It's running, but it's not doing any good. There's a new version of glibc in unstable tha

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Igor Genibel
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:08:44AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this? Surely not ! ;) > Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 > in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349 > > Warning: Compilation failed: noth

RE: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread STOJICEVIC Edi EXPSIA
> Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages > properly. So here are packages up for adoption : > > coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, > libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, > muttprint, type1inst, freefont, and sha

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Igor Genibel wrote: > Hi all, > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your > packages such as: > - the

Re: OpenLDAP with TLS support

2002-08-27 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:18:43PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Using objdump -T to look at it, > ldap_pvt_tls_get_peer and other things that are ldap_*_tls_* > seems to be defined only on the TLS version, and not on the > other version. pvt -> private. I don't think a user application is all

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:10:26PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any logs with > build failure in the buildd link, > but it probably needs more work on the buildd page side? Last year (!) I write a patch for the buildd log page and s

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Aurélien Beaujean
Le mardi 27 août 2002 à 22:50, Chanop Silpa-Anan écrivait: > coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, > libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, > muttprint, type1inst, freefont, and sharefont. As Rene took muttprint, i took latex2html and i will also upl

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Indra Kusuma
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote: # Hola amigos, # # # Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages # properly. So here are packages up for adoption : # # coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, # libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 27.08.02 um 15:03:31 schrieb Colin Watson: > > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in > > stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. > > According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. > Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in t

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Igor Genibel
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: Hi, > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in > stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. > According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. It is now fixed. As Colin s

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Igor Genibel
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:18:58PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > > Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in turn seems to provoke the bug > > Daniel Burrows mentioned, so there's probably some additional regexp > > metacharacter escaping needed somewhere. > > Yes, very similar problem for kimwi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Piefel
Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel: > - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=nick you can see there is 1 bug for the file package. But in fact there's d

Dumb little utilities

2002-08-27 Thread J. Scott Edwards
Hello, I have a compiler (based upon SmallEiffel) and a bunch of dumb little utilites that I have been planning to make .deb files for. But I don't know if they have enough general appeal to make them official, or if I should just make them and put them on my SourceForge project pages. Does any

Re: PHP4 + Oracle

2002-08-27 Thread Rob Bradford
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 11:56, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote: > Hallo > > I need to use oracle with php4 on Debian? How can I do it? Could > somebody [help me] build php4-oracle package? > Thanks > Can you not use ODBC and the libphp-adodb package? Furthermore i'm interested as to why there are two p

Re: Dumb little utilities

2002-08-27 Thread Oliver Elphick
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 17:11, J. Scott Edwards wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a compiler (based upon SmallEiffel) and a bunch of dumb little > utilites that I have been planning to make .deb files for. But I don't > know if they have enough general appeal to make them official, or if I > should jus

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Joey Hess
Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). This is very nice. A few comments: - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU. - On a 1280 pixel wide display, I can only s

Re: testing script

2002-08-27 Thread Bdale Garbee
aj@azure.humbug.org.au (Anthony Towns) writes: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:40:09PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > I was just told the script updating testing doesn't run at the moment. > > Is that true? If so, is there a reason? Are we already in freeze? :-) > > It's running, but it's not doin

Re: PHP4 + Oracle

2002-08-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:16:19PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: > On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 11:56, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote: > > Hallo > > > > I need to use oracle with php4 on Debian? How can I do it? Could > > somebody [help me] build php4-oracle package? > > Thanks > Can you not use ODBC and the li

Play a Hilarious Prank Call

2002-08-27 Thread UK PRANK CALLS
To Play a Hilarious Prank on your mates please visit http://ukprankcalls.com

Bug#158507: ITP: statslog -- An IRC Channel Logger

2002-08-27 Thread Chris Mason
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-27 Severity: wishlist * Package name: statslog Version : 2.0.7 Upstream Author : Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.k-rad.org/bin * License : GPL Description : An IRC Channel Logger A utility to

Re: Accepted vim 6.1.165-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:47:22PM -0400, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > vim (6.1.165-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Change priority to extra "CLEAR!" "AGAIN! CLEAR!" Why, God, why? -- G. Branden Robinson|I'm sorry if the following sounds Debian GNU/L

Re: PHP4 + Oracle

2002-08-27 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:46:02PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:16:19PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: > > Furthermore i'm interested as to why there are two packages called > > libphp-adodb and libphp-phplot. Which seems to break with the php4- > > naming scheme that the m

Re: PHP4 + Oracle

2002-08-27 Thread Thorsten Sauter
Hello, On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:56:38PM +0200, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote: > Hallo > > I need to use oracle with php4 on Debian? How can I do it? Could > somebody [help me] build php4-oracle package? > Thanks I have created a simple package based on the latest php4-packages from testing. This

Re: Accepted vim 6.1.165-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Joey Hess
Branden Robinson wrote: > >* Change priority to extra > > > > > > > > > > > > "CLEAR!" > > > > "AGAIN! CLEAR!" > > > > > > Why, God, why? Cause you need an exotic peice of hardware called a "teletype" or "CRT" or "LCD" to use it, I suppose. Or maybe it's that "qwerty ke

Re: Accepted vim 6.1.165-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 14:32, Joey Hess wrote: > Cause you need an exotic peice of hardware called a "teletype" or "CRT" > or "LCD" to use it, I suppose. Or maybe it's that "qwerty keyboard" > thing. Perhaps it's the "conflicts with something that is standard or higher" rule in action... although I

Bug#158543: RFA: python-pgsql -- A Python DB-API 2.0 interface to PostgreSQL v7.x

2002-08-27 Thread Kevin Lindsay
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Probably being the most common reason, lack of time or commitment. I know people are still using this package, such me, so hopefully someone can adopt it that will keep it updated better than I can. --- Kevin Lindsay D

Bug#158548: ITP: ocamldsort -- A dependency sorter for OCaml source files

2002-08-27 Thread Dimitri Ara
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: ocamldsort Version : 0.12 Upstream Author : Dimitri Ara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://dimitri.mutu.net/files/ocamldsort-0.12.tar.gz License : GPL Description : A dependency sorter for OCaml source fil

Re: apt-get wants to upgrade package to same version?

2002-08-27 Thread Brian May
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:36:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > The pins are used to determine which of all the available versions for > the package are candidates for installation, in Ludovic's case both the > woody and unstable versions are candidates (both have pin > now). In my case, th

Re: How to get rid of non-free packers?

2002-08-27 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On August 27, 2002 at 2:28AM -0700, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > LHa 0.01-1.00: Masaru Oki (LHa original author, 1991-1992) > Suse.com list e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] He is one of the NetBSD developers. His e-mail address is <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > LHa 1.10-1.14: Nob

Re: Accepted vim 6.1.165-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Branden Robinson wrote: > Why, God, why? Well.. I wanted to get rid of those annoying priority override messages from dinstall. Of course I overdid it by making all vim packages priority extra: ftpmaster lists vim and vim-ruby as priority optional. I have no idea what made them dec

Unreadable packages in dak queue

2002-08-27 Thread Philippe Troin
Is there any reason why the packages in the dak queue (for example /org/ftp.debian.org/queue/new on ftp-master) are 660 instead of 664 ? Phil.

can a non developper become a debian maintainer ?

2002-08-27 Thread Rémi Letot
Hi all, I have a simple question : can a non developper type become a debian maintainer ? The reason is that I use debian on multiple servers and workstations, and I'd like to contribute to the project. I'm definitely not a developper, more a sysadmin. I know debian quite well. I can also compile,

Re: Unreadable packages in dak queue

2002-08-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:26:15PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote: > Is there any reason why the packages in the dak queue (for example > /org/ftp.debian.org/queue/new on ftp-master) are 660 instead of 664 ? Yep. Export notification hasn't been sent for them, etc. That's the theory, at least. --

Re: Unreadable packages in dak queue

2002-08-27 Thread Philippe Troin
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:26:15PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote: > > Is there any reason why the packages in the dak queue (for example > > /org/ftp.debian.org/queue/new on ftp-master) are 660 instead of 664 ? > > Yep. Export notification hasn't bee

Re: can a non developper become a debian maintainer ?

2002-08-27 Thread Russell Coker
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 01:50, Rémi Letot wrote: > I have a simple question : can a non developper type become a debian > maintainer ? The reason is that I use debian on multiple servers and > workstations, and I'd like to contribute to the project. I'm > definitely not a developper, more a sysadmin. I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). > Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your > packages such as: >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

2002-08-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like > 'build.php?&pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :) On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the redirect and follow the spec

Re: DMA, ide-scsi, devfs by default

2002-08-27 Thread Miles Bader
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What's especially cool is that it hardwires the British (or Australian, > > in this case, I guess) spelling of `disc' as part of the UI > > The idea that devfs hardwires anything seems to be very popular. It is > also completely wrong. You can use th

Re: Dumb little utilities

2002-08-27 Thread J. Scott Edwards
I guess I was worried that they are so trivial that any of the real programmers on this list could recreate them in 5 minutes with sed, awk, and perl. :) But, well ok: little endian hex dump find a file within a file duplicate file remover tab and untab (I just discovered that this can be done w