Hello,
in general I like the idea of descriptions of manpages. I would like it
even more if it would regard i18n descriptions which are produced by
the ddtp server.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:32:16PM -0700, Mark Rafn wrote:
> I'm not certain I agree. Point one of the social contract is "Debian Will
> Remain 100% Free Software". The obvious reading of this is that anything
> that is not free software cannot be in Debian.
I tend to doubt that *either* was
Hello,
it would be nice if treetool could be available for all released architectures.
Cureently only ia64 is missing.
auric:~> madison treetool
treetool |2.0.2-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, powerpc,
sparc treetool |2.0.2-2 | testing | source, alpha, arm, i386, m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tille, Andreas) writes:
> Could any kind soul please do the job or just poin to an ia64 box with
> installed build dependencies?
Done.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I and the upstream author have fixed the C++ problem that inhibit
gmetadom to build on HPPA with g++ 3.0.
Could someone then rebuilt gmetadom and two of the packages that depend
on it on HPPA?
The three packages are the ones of the subject given in the order in
which they have to be rebuilt. (The
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:25:22AM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:02:34PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> > you propose to add 'some' diff files for all files on ftp-master.d.o?
> >
> > With rsync we need only one rsync-checksum file per normal file and
> > all a
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 17:25, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> What you are suggesting is that the server store checksums for precalculated
> blocks on the server. This would be 4 bytes per 1k in the original file or
> so. The transaction proceeds as follows:
>
> 1. Client asks for checksum list off
Hi,
Your package upload (cl-imho, manpages-de, tiger) was rejected due to a
mismatch in the original source md5sum. I saw this in
auric:/org/ftp.debian.org/incoming/REJECT/*.reason . The package I
maintain (lire) was rejected for the same reason. I have absolutely no
idea how this was caused, o
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:40:41PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> s/refused/discouraged/ and I would agree. Isn't the goal of Debian
> providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free
> software anymore? IMHO the "we support non-free software" clause was
I think this is one of the g
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:37:35AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> Your package upload (cl-imho, manpages-de, tiger) was rejected due to a
> mismatch in the original source md5sum. I saw this in
> auric:/org/ftp.debian.org/incoming/REJECT/*.reason . The package I
> maintain (lire) was rejected for
Hi Jeroen,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:42:51PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>
> I'm getting sick of people who can't read. Let's say the same thing
> for the next time. Maybe a lot of people on this list just need
> glasses, so I do it in upper case that you can easily read it:
I have yet to see
Hi Donald,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:54:54PM -0500, Donald J Bindner wrote:
> Well, I didn't expect to inspire such a vibrant thread! A couple
> of responses (not in anger, just adding some perspective).
>
> 1) free vs. non-free alternatives
>
> I use VMWare 2.0. If you think that bochs and
* Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020409 20:45]:
> You don't have to tell me how glibc works, I develop it.
Yeah, and Daniel Stone is a Linux kernel developer.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:26:17AM -0700, Robert Tiberius Johnson wrote:
> - I tend to update every day. For people who update every day, the
> diff-based scheme only needs to transfer about 8K, but the
> checksum-based scheme needs to transfer 45K. So for me, diffs are
> better. :)
I think you'
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 07:28:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> 0 days of diffs: 843.7 KiB (the current situation)
> ...which pretty much matches what I'd expect: at the moment, just to
> update main, people download around 1.2MB per day;
Uh, obviously this should be 843KiB. (I'd been playi
Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Very nice :) But I have 2 things:
> > 1) Where's apache2-modules? Subversion depends on them!
> Subversion needs to update :) Happily, I don't have to be back compat, but I
> will add a provides for apache2-modules. We scrapped the seperate deb as it
>
Od: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Do: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 10
11:26:22 2002
Temat: Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0
Data: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:25:53 +0200
> * Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020409 20:45]:
> > You don't have
Quoting Marcelo E. Magallon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > missing... try "deb http://people.debian.org/~ssmeenk/ ./" for
> http://people.debian.org/~mmagallo/packages/subversion/ sid/i386/
> should work.
Okay, I admit, i'm a mess at creating apt-lines :)
Your packages are fine, Thom will add '
Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Now let's lart Thom for compiling apache2 against libdb3, instead of
> > > libdb4, which renders subversion unusable :)
> > Again, I don't know about this...
> I'm pretty unhappy about the LARTing ;-)
heh.. sorry? :)
Regards,
Sander.
--
| Is er ee
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:44:19AM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:37:35AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > Your package upload (cl-imho, manpages-de, tiger) was rejected due to a
> > mismatch in the original source md5sum.
>
> Most likely this is caused by different times
Hi,
anyone know about this problem in debian?
yes
^z
bg
and the terminal ignore any pressed key || combination.
Seems to be debian-specific, does not happen on slackware (don't know
about any other distros)
Michal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:58:24AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:39:19PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > I beleive this method is patented by somebody, [snip]
>
> has someone a pointer?
Here's some stuff from my mail archives - I haven't checked whether
the l
>> Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your packages are fine, Thom will add 'Provides' lines for the
> apache2-modules packagename. :) Thanks alot for your effort to package
> this.
These are actually David's packages, I just updated them.
> > > Now let's lart Thom for compiling
* Sander Smeenk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > Very nice :) But I have 2 things:
> > > 1) Where's apache2-modules? Subversion depends on them!
> > Subversion needs to update :) Happily, I don't have to be back compat, but I
> > will add a provides fo
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:22:50AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:25:22AM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > With the standard rsync algorithm, the rsync checksum files would actually
> > be 8 times larger than the original file (you need to store the checksum
> > f
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Michal Medvecký wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anyone know about this problem in debian?
>
> yes
> ^z
> bg
>
> and the terminal ignore any pressed key || combination.
Well, I don't see anything unexpected:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ yes
y
y
y
y
[lots of y's...]
y
y
y
[1]
* Marcelo E. Magallon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> >> Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Your packages are fine, Thom will add 'Provides' lines for the
> > apache2-modules packagename. :) Thanks alot for your effort to package
> > this.
>
> These are actually David's packages, I
On Sunday 07 April 2002 22:26, King "Leo (Martin Oberzalek)" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it's not possible linking a C++ library compiled with g++-2.9x to a C++
> application compiled with g++-3.0.
>
> We all no the reasons...
>
> My question is how I should handle this, on debian distributions that
> are
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Isn't the goal of Debian
> > providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free
> > software anymore?
>
> No, no, nonono, no, no, no.
Yes, of course. That's one of Debian
Mariusz Przygodzki wrote:
>
> Od: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Do: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> X-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 10
> 11:26:22 2002
> Temat: Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0
> Data: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:25:53 +0200
>
> > * Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PRO
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:26:17AM -0700, Robert Tiberius Johnson wrote:
> This looks like an interesting algorithm, so I decided to compare it to
> the diff scheme analyzed in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200204/msg00502.html
>
> The above message also gives my analys
Hi Raphael!
You wrote:
> Please grab it, burn it, and try to boot on it (you can also install
> Debian with it if you want :-)).
I just tried it, and it seems to work very well. I had no problems
booting whatsoever.
> If you have troubles during the installation process, please report your
> p
I mean:
yes
^z
fg (sorry:)
^c
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Michal Medvecký wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anyone know about this problem in debian?
>
> yes
> ^z
> bg
>
> and the terminal ignore any pressed key || combination.
>
> Seems to be debian-specific, does not happen on slackware (do
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:29:05PM +0200, Michal Medvecký <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> I mean:
>
> yes
> ^z
> fg (sorry:)
>
> ^c
Nothing strange happens to me with zsh or bash when I try that.
Daniel
--
/ Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Evening ladies and gents,
got a file here that's set suid root as a tty device.
$ dpkg -S /dev/ptmx
dpkg: /dev/ptmx not found
$
doing a
$ grep ptmx -r /var/lib/dpkg/ | less
$
shows the tetex-base tetex-extra packages and their font ins
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:52:21AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:32:16PM -0700, Mark Rafn wrote:
> > I'm not certain I agree. Point one of the social contract is "Debian Will
> > Remain 100% Free Software". The obvious reading of this is that anything
> > that is not
Quoting Marcelo E. Magallon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > Now let's lart Thom for compiling apache2 against libdb3, instead of
> > > > libdb4, which renders subversion unusable :)
> > > Again, I don't know about this...
> > Thom does :) He didn't want tons of emails questioning where to ge
Previously Santiago Vila wrote:
> gettext (0.10.40-5) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Modified /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50gettext.el so that it only uses
> modify-coding-system-alist when it's actually ok to do so.
> This closes: #110416 (xemacs21) and also closes: #141446 (emacs19).
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 05:51:30AM -0700, David D. W. Downey wrote:
> I know that a grep -i ptmx -r kernel-source-2.4.18/ will show a
> Pseudo-tty which is fine. The devices.txt shows that it's a Master pty
> for the pty master multiplex, and the lettering positions within the pty array
> list.
Th
build/m68k 1.168
Build started at 20020410-0651
**
Checking available source versions...
sbuild received SIGTERM -- shutting down
**
Finished
> Quoting Peter S Galbraith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disk space
>
> Just FYI, this '0k disk space' means there was 0k disk space needed to
> build the package. (Since it got killed with SIGTERM).
Ah, I thought the reverse for some reason (killed because of no space).
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Michal Medveck? wrote:
Hi,
I think the "y" stream of the background process running
obfuscates your command prompt and it seems not
to be accepting commands...
On my potato with 2.4.18 if I do:
bash ~$ yes|grep -v y
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 08:29:49PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:22:50AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:25:22AM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > With the standard rsync algorithm, the rsync checksum files would actually
> >
Dear Nicolas,
woody is coming and libxslt package in testing is still at version
1.0.12 which has a fastidious bug/feature that create .memdump files
spread all over the filesystem (includeing "/" !!!). In later versions
at least this bug/feature is not compiled unless explicitely stated with
a c
In reference to a message from Stefano Zacchiroli, dated Apr 10:
> I and the upstream author have fixed the C++ problem that inhibit
> gmetadom to build on HPPA with g++ 3.0.
>
> Could someone then rebuilt gmetadom and two of the packages that depend
> on it on HPPA?
if you upload new sources/ver
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:06:44AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> release is coming soon ... and we need a bit of feedback about
> a new feature we plan to use on CD1 of Debian woody for i386.
On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a core
compon
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I just tried it, and it seems to work very well. I had no problems
> booting whatsoever.
I did just a quick look (no real install just booted and selected the
language) and I really like the i18n stuff!!!
Great job! Many thanks!
Kind regards
On Wednesday 10 Apr 2002 3:36 pm, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> As a last resort I can NMU it, even if I'm not very in touch with the
> package nor with the upstream sources.
When I prepared the NMU libxslt greater than 1.0.12 needed a newer libxml2
than was available in the archive. Now it should
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-10
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: billard-gl
Version : 1.70
Upstream Author : Various <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.billardgl.de/
* License : GPL
Description : A billiard game using OpenGL
-- Syst
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Previously Santiago Vila wrote:
>> gettext (0.10.40-5) unstable; urgency=medium
[...]
> Does gettext still depend om emacs-* through gettext-el? I really would
> like to see that fixed before gettext makes it to testing.
[...]
Hello,
afaics 0.10.40-4
LAPTOP
PENTIUM 4,WINDOW 98 2ND. 2.2 GHZ INTEL AT SPEEDS UP TO 2.8 GHZ
UTILIZING THE LATEST DDR RAM UPGRADE RAM TO 1024MB(PC2100)266MHZ
40 GB ULTRA ATA /100(BUILT IN HARD DRIVE UP TO40 GB
2
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Gerhard Muntingh wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 01:36:40PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > On Apr 07, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Isn't it a bit heavy to make debconf depend on python ?
> >
> > Why would debconf have to depend on python? You stick the module in
> > and on
hi all,
i packaged gshield 2.7.1 for debian. everything is available at
http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gshield/ .
please check it!
thanks
cavok
-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 08:11:14AM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> if you upload new sources/versions they will automatically be retried,
> please check the buildd logs at http://buildd.debian.org/ to see the
> status.
Already done it, but I'm experiencing delays on hppa, so I asked here.
> assum
Am 10.04.02 um 15:57:37 schrieb Will Newton:
> but beware that libxml2 currently has an RC bug so libxslt will be
> blocked until that is fixed.
No RC bug there, Junichi Uekawa downgraded it himself.
> I'm not sure if Nicholas reads this list, I had no success contacting him
> previously.
Pleas
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Santiago Vila wrote:
> > gettext (0.10.40-5) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> >* Modified /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50gettext.el so that it only uses
> > modify-coding-system-alist when it's actually ok to do so.
> > This clos
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > But I don't know why it got killed ;)
>
> Maybe some admin thought there were some important packages to process.
> :-(
It's more likely killed because the build daemon was brought down for
maintenance. Since it didn't even download the source, th
> Scheme Disk space Bandwidth
> ---
> Checksums (bwidth optimal)26K 81K
> diffs (4 days)32K 331K
> diffs (9 days)71K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> suggerì:
You might have luck with 2.4 and the UDF filesystem and udftools.
Haven't tried it myself, so I'm not sure it'll work. :)
But I have already tried: the kernel still assume the cd drive as
read-only at low level (or so I've been said :) , so I can only cr
>>"Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> As a developer, I am by no means in a position to try to
Steve> interpret what the phrasers of the Social Contract /really/
Steve> meant to say. They wrote what they wrote, and I agreed to it
Steve> as written; as did many other d
Package: x2x
Version: 1.27-6
I no longer have the time or the inclination to maintain x2x. I've just
fixed a quick imake bug and orphaned it. A previous NMU'er has helpfully
debhelperised the package for you.
--
Charles Briscoe-Smith Hacking Free Software for fun and profit
"When y
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The issue is that the Debian Social Contract doesn't say "All software
> in Debian will remain 100% free", it says "Debian will remain 100% Free
> Software."
Interesting. I had always read it as "Debian will remain (100% Free)
Softw
>>"Adam" == Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> Um, you byte-compile when building the package, duh.
Adam> Any runtime compilation is wrong(and yes, I include emacs in this).
Emacs doesn't do runtime byte compilation. Debian emacs add on
modules to install time bye compilation
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Emacs doesn't do runtime byte compilation. Debian emacs add on
> modules to install time bye compilation, which is not run time. Any
> reason you think byte compilation ought not to happen on
> installation? (slowing down the install is one
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:14:36PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > If you have troubles during the installation process, please report your
> > problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Are people working on the dutch translation of the installation? If not,
> I could do it.
We still don't have anyone to
Hi,
after unsuccessful attempts to contact the maintainer of gnuchess, Martin
Mitchell (he did not answer at all to my emails), I would like to propose
a change to the packaging of gnuchess. Andreas Tille did at least do an
NMU to update to version 5.03 which fixes several outstanding bugs. One
re
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The byte compilation should be done when the package is built, not
> at runtime, not at install time.
So you're saying that the maintainer should need to either create
separate packages for a given add-on for all current (and future)
Emacs flavors, or that
#include
Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 10:45:35AM:
> On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a core
> component mere weeks before the scheduled release? There is no way that it
Why not? Weeks != days.
> could receive sufficient testing in that time. I
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:24:00PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve> As a developer, I am by no means in a position to try to
> Steve> interpret what the phrasers of the Social Contract /really/
> Steve> meant to say. They wrote w
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The byte compilation should be done when the package is built, not
> > at runtime, not at install time.
>
> So you're saying that the maintainer should need to either create
> separate packages for a given add-o
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:30:08PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> current (and future) Emacs flavors within the one package, even though
> for most people that will be useless data?
Not to mention requiring huge amounts of disk space for Emacs packages
even though the maintainer is likely to use onl
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:03:11PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > The history section in my book, which is declared invarient in the
> > license, was written by Ian M. and has no technical bearing on the rest of
> > the book's content, but has every re
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
> Not to mention requiring huge amounts of disk space for Emacs packages
> even though the maintainer is likely to use only one.
Is debian for maintainers or users?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:38:13PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Apr 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > But does that mean they can posts question about problems with that
> > non-free software which are not related to Debian at all (the only
> > relation is that the user runs
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 14:39, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> I'd be happy to hear clarifications from the author and contemporaries,
> then; to be honest, my memory of Debian history isn't good enough to
> even know who to approach. (The debian-doc package is conspicuously
> lacking of the relevant c
Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Packages: dict-easton, dict-gazetteer, dict-hitchcock
> The listed packages are still located in the Potato directory,
> possibly because there wasn't any update necessary during the full
> Woody development phase, but maybe also because there is no intere
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is debian for maintainers or users?
Users are well-served by not requiring a maintainer to release new
byte-compiled versions of a package for a new flavor of Emacs.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
Stealing a rhinoceros shou
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:56:08PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Not to mention requiring huge amounts of disk space for Emacs packages
> > even though the maintainer is likely to use only one.
> Is debian for maintainers or users?
Making it prohibitively
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:03:11PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > The freedom of expression of the author is what is being
> > protected by this clause. The freedom to express opinion without having
> > those statements twisted into something complete
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
>> Emacs doesn't do runtime byte compilation. Debian emacs add on
>> modules to install time bye compilation, which is not run time. Any
>> reason you think byte compilation ought not to happen on
>> i
This happened to me on my first upload of libgmp3_4.0.1. At first I
thought it was a breakage caused by this library, but eventually resolved
the problem by upgrading ssh. (I use scp to do uploads to auric)
The tarball was being corrupted by ssh during the transfer.
HTH,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Dan
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:54:54PM -0500, Donald J Bindner wrote:
> Well, I didn't expect to inspire such a vibrant thread! A couple
> of responses (not in anger, just adding some perspective).
>
> 1) free vs. non-free alternatives
>
> I use VMWare 2.0. If you think that bochs and Plex86 aren't
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 08:33:00PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 10:45:35AM:
>
> > On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a core
> > component mere weeks before the scheduled release? There is no way that it
>
> Why not? We
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 142164 general
Bug#142164: apt: output ignores locale
Bug reassigned from package `apt' to `general'.
> severity 142164 wishlist
Bug#142164: apt: output ignores locale
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
#include
Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 04:45:08PM:
> > Why not? Weeks != days.
>
> 10 days != long enough to test a completely different _primary_ way of
> booting the installation system.
a) isolinux is not completely new. It is syslinux, extended with ability
of reading iso96
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:45:08PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 08:33:00PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > And sorry, IMHO is idepci the worst kernel-image to be used for CD#1 as
> > the only available flavor.
>
> It seems to work for a large number of users, and that is i
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:52:52PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:03:11PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > > The history section in my book, which is declared invarient in the
> > > license, was written by Ian M. and has no technical bearing on the rest of
> > > the book's
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:57:32PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 14:39, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > I'd be happy to hear clarifications from the author and contemporaries,
> > then; to be honest, my memory of Debian history isn't good enough to
> > even know who to approach
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:23:26PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 04:45:08PM:
> > 10 days != long enough to test a completely different _primary_ way of
> > booting the installation system.
>
> a) isolinux is not completely new. It is syslinux
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:12:05PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 05:51:30AM -0700, David D. W. Downey wrote:
> [PGP-signed message]
>
> Where is this key (C5A76BF6) available for download, neither
> keyservers, nor
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
mQGiBDyvwRcRBACH5M/fUVvXh0SvhvmkMbKcIvHaBD32O+xKMWponbIbcOvChMU0
KBHnUzCsypwfTMKZpdpIsDyUTmbGo19Zm0+1kVcP5esZles1Ffi9Mply1HKMHLIT
y0/uGvFG+79hVL+YndsMDtxn/O5dN7kXA08ymyvkVhPTH/u4frU0q
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: usemod
Version : 0.92
Upstream Author : Clifford A. Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.usemod.com/
* License : GPL
Description : CGI-based Wiki clone
UseMod is a
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:52:52PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> While I'm not sure that M. Mouse should be owned by anyone but Uncle Walt,
> I understand the fear of the current copyright holder, given that I am in
> direct contact with the spirit of the original Mr. Disney. He has some
> very clea
OK, folks.
For the purposes of consistency, I've signed the old lost key with the new
key and posted both keys to the keyservers. I've put the old lost key
(Just the public key export of it of course) on
linuxnewbie.codecastle.com, devel.codecastle.com, and
admin.codecastle.com in the my_public_ke
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 04:01:46PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 15:03, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Joe Drew wrote:
> > > Let me re-iterate this for people who might not have gotten the message:
> > >
> > > LINDOWS.COM HAS SPENT REAL MONEY ON DEBCONF 2 AND DESERVES SUPPORT, NOT
> >
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> IIS server because "we" were given money. I believe principles are more
> important than money.
So spend your time writing the scripts.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind th
On Wed Apr 10, 2002 at 06:02:28PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:23:26PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> > #include
> > Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 04:45:08PM:
> > > 10 days != long enough to test a completely different _primary_ way of
> > > booting the
I promised myself that I wouldn't get into this any more, but it seems
that people still aren't understanding...
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 20:15, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> Well, it seems to me like you're implying there would be
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] that would be so lame that they would not know the
> di
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:40:03PM -0700, David D. W. Downey wrote:
> For the purposes of consistency, I've signed the old lost key with the new
> key and posted both keys to the keyservers.
...
> I'm hereby using these emails, the signature on the old key as sent to
> the keyservers, and the we
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
