[kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-10 Thread Daniel Stone
The libpng[23] screwup in unstable is now more or less resolved with kde{base,graphics,network} in incoming. Now, the only packages that need rebuilding are kdeaddons, kinkatta, kmerlin, koffice, and maybe kdetoys (not sure on that one - Ben?). kdelibs was installed last night. Thanks muchly to ca

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Jonathan Walther
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:49:59PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote: IMHO, it is not evil to append to the headers of the message. Every MTA does that. But if you delete stuff of alter the actual message, then it is evil.. I agree. But that is what Evolution does. This bug isn't planned to be fixed for a

Re: Gnome 2 packages?

2002-01-10 Thread Martin Sjögren
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:46:51PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: > >> "MS" == Martin Sjögren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm starting to port my Gnome programs to Gnome 2, and was a bit stumped > > when there was lots of Gnome 2 packages missing from unstable. The ones I > > found right n

Musixtex not going into testing?

2002-01-10 Thread Tille, Andreas
Hello, some time ago I did an NMU of MusixTex which was accepted by the maintainer. I can't see any reason why this did not entered testing: ~> madison musixtex musixtex | 1:0.98-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc musixtex | 1:0.99-1 | testing | sou

Re: Musixtex not going into testing?

2002-01-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Tille, Andreas wrote: > Hello, Hi Andreas, >... > have access to a sparc. Is there any description how to proceed > for uploads of the same package for other architectures? The "-B" option of dpkg-buildpackage does what you want to do. If you don't have your GPG key on th

Re: Gnome 2 packages?

2002-01-10 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:39:07PM +0100, Martin Sjvgren wrote: > I'm starting to port my Gnome programs to Gnome 2, and was a bit stumped > when there was lots of Gnome 2 packages missing from unstable. The ones I > found right now were libbonoboui and libgnomecanvas, but I'm sure there > are othe

Re: lock files in /home???

2002-01-10 Thread Steffen Neumann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian May) writes: > Is it really required to have file locks under $HOME? Wouldn't, say > /tmp be more appropriate? Depends. If the subject of locking is, say, your maildir on a shared home, you wouldn't want a nautilus on another machine ruin your mail, hence just one lockf

Re: Gnome 2 packages?

2002-01-10 Thread Takuo KITAME
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "MS" == Martin Sjögren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...: MS> > libgnomecanvas will be uploaded tomorrow with libgnomeprintui and MS> > libgnomeui MS> Great! Now let's see, I think libbonoboui needs libgnome, which means a MS> whole lot of packages are neede

Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-10 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 05:17:08PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > The libpng[23] screwup in unstable is now more or less resolved with > kde{base,graphics,network} in incoming. Now, the only packages that need > rebuilding are kdeaddons, kinkatta, kmerlin, koffice, and maybe kdetoys > (not sure on th

I am off-line January 10th-26th

2002-01-10 Thread Jens Peter Secher
If there are serious problems in the packages I maintain, then simply make an NMU. (Since I am not an official developer, I send this here. Sorry for the bother.) -- Jens Peter Secher

Re: Gnome 2 packages?

2002-01-10 Thread Christian Marillat
>> "MS" == Martin Sjögren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:46:51PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: [...] >> libgnomecanvas will be uploaded tomorrow with libgnomeprintui and >> libgnomeui > Great! Now let's see, I think libbonoboui needs libgnome, which means a > whole

Re: [ccheney@cheney.cx: libqt2 libpng2 resolution]

2002-01-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Adam Heath wrote: > > > What? That means that you can't have a libpng3 program on a machine with > > > libqt2-dev installed ... icky. > > > > Yes, but that's the only way I see to ensure that there aren't some ugly > > problems like e.g. > > No, completely wrong. You want to k

Re: Harden

2002-01-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 11:41:25AM +0100, Edi STOJICEVIC wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to have some information about harden ? What kind of information do you need? > Where can i find how to use and configure it ? You can't. It is a meta-package. Regards, // Ola > Thnx > > > +=

Re: We still need sponsors!

2002-01-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
On 9 Jan 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: >... > Is there an easy web page to point people at, where people could > request sponsorship and sponsors could advertise their availability? That's exactly what [1] is for (BTW: there's a link to this page from the Developers' Corner [2]). cu Adrian

SUGGESTION: Re: Some thoughts about problems within Debian

2002-01-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:24:12PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > [3] "tries to fix" means that he looks into the bug. I do expect a > maintainer to be able to fix a "missing build dependency on xyz" bug > or to forward the bug to upstream. OTOH it's clear that there are > cases where

Re: [ccheney@cheney.cx: libqt2 libpng2 resolution]

2002-01-10 Thread Anthony Towns
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:44:34AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > To put my example for an "ugly problem" in words: > A program links with two libraries. One of them has an inter-library > dependency on libpng2, the other one has an inter-library dependency on > libpng3. AFAIR the -dev packages of the

Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:19:52AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 05:17:08PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > The libpng[23] screwup in unstable is now more or less resolved with > > kde{base,graphics,network} in incoming. Now, the only packages that need > > rebuildin

Re: SUGGESTION: Re: Some thoughts about problems within Debian

2002-01-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:24:12PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > [3] "tries to fix" means that he looks into the bug. I do expect a > > maintainer to be able to fix a "missing build dependency on xyz" bug > > or to forward the bug to upstream. OT

Re: Any archive of pre-slink nonus sources?

2002-01-10 Thread Nick Phillips
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 11:46:33PM +0100, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona wrote: > Hi, > > I've been looking at ftp://archive.debian.org, ftp://nonus.debian.org > and other sites and I have not found nonus source packages for Debian > distributions older than slink (hamm, bo, etc.) (In fact, I have fo

Re: SUGGESTION: Re: Some thoughts about problems within Debian

2002-01-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 11:27:20AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Hi Ola, Hi again > the "help" tag already present and exactly for this purpose: > >help > The maintainer is requesting help with dealing with this bug. Ahh it already exists! Cool. Well then it is a bug on the www page

Re: We still need sponsors!

2002-01-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 05:15:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG écrivait: > A brief question. QA often requires saying "you volunteered to take > over maintenance of foo, but nothing has happened in a while". A > frequent response is "I need a sponsor"; occasionally there's "I'm > having trouble g

Re: SUGGESTION: Re: Some thoughts about problems within Debian

2002-01-10 Thread Chris Danis
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist wrote: Ola> On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 11:27:20AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: +> the "help" tag already present and exactly for this purpose: Ola> Ahh it already exists! Cool. Well then it is a bug on the www pages. Ola> Missing here ... http

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AFAIK the only well and out of the box > > interoperating combination of MUA and IMAPd is pine together with > > uw-imapd which is about as configurable as you

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Erik Steffl
Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AFAIK the only well and out of the box > > > interoperating combination of MUA and IMAPd is pine together with

Re: SUGGESTION: Re: Some thoughts about problems within Debian

2002-01-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:42:27AM -0500, Chris Danis wrote: > > > On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Ola> On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 11:27:20AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > +> the "help" tag already present and exactly for this purpose: > > Ola> Ahh it already exist

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:59:34PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > > Most things (certainly mutt and kmail, I can't think of anything else I > > tried that gave me problems) interoperate quite happily with both UW > > IMAP and Courier IMAP. I ca

Re: SUGGESTION: Re: Some thoughts about problems within Debian

2002-01-10 Thread Peter Mathiasson
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 01:45:01PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > +> the "help" tag already present and exactly for this purpose: > > > > Ola> Ahh it already exists! Cool. Well then it is a bug on the www pages. > > Ola> Missing here ... http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities > >

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Erik Steffl wrote: > Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote: > > > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AFAIK the only well and out of the box > > > > interoperat

Re: SUGGESTION: Re: Some thoughts about problems within Debian

2002-01-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 02:22:10PM +0100, Peter Mathiasson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 01:45:01PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > +> the "help" tag already present and exactly for this purpose: > > > > > > Ola> Ahh it already exists! Cool. Well then it is a bug on the www > > > pages.

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:59:34PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Most things (certainly mutt and kmail, I can't think of anything else I > > > tried that gave me problems) interoperate quite happ

Re: Preparing Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r5

2002-01-10 Thread Martin Schulze
Florian Weimer wrote: > > Development for 2.2r5 is near being finished ready to be released. > > Will the glob() problem in GNU libc be fixed in 2.2r5? No. It has to wait until 2.2r6 and until it makes it to security.debian.org. There are currently fixed packages for sparc and ia32 uploaded (int

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 02:30:15PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > > kmail and mutt both play happily with both the Courier and UW IMAP > > servers. > I'm talking about cyrus. A while back it was more like "IMAP is crap and barely interoperabl

Re: SUGGESTION: Re: Some thoughts about problems within Debian

2002-01-10 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Ola Lundqvist wrote: >Ahh it already exists! Cool. Well then it is a bug on the www pages. >Missing here ... >http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities It was at http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags when I looked today... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IBM "Key alliances" ?

2002-01-10 Thread Russell Coker
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 06:47, Shaya Potter wrote: > > > There's more, if you replace the RH system they pre-install, you're > > > losing the warranty on the hardware. > > > > Where does it say that? IMHO, that would be _very_ stupid on IBM's part. > > speaking not as someone who has worked for IBM, bu

[±¤°í] 1/4 ½ÇÁ÷ÀÚ ¹«·áIT±³À° ¾È³»

2002-01-10 Thread ITÀü¹®Çб³
Title: ::: The 2002 1/4 IT Specialist Course ::: ▒ 국내 최고의 CIW 국제공인 전문가들이 전수하는 생생한 실무 교육 ▒ 실무 Process를 총망라하여 체계적으로 접근 ▒ 다양한 Case Study와 현장 실습 등을 통한 실용적 학습 체제 ▒ 6개월 간의 전문가 양성교육 노동부 지원의 고학력 미취업자 대상의 실무위주 교육 ◈인터넷 비지니스 프로그래밍 교육 과정 포토샵,드림

libgd-perl: can't build on ia64

2002-01-10 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
Package: libgd-perl Version: 1.38-0.2 Severity: critical Tag: patch The package doesn't build on ia64 http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=libgd-perl I belive this patch fixes the problem: diff -Nru libgd-perl-1.38/GD.xs libgd-perl-1.38.new/GD.xs --- libgd-perl-1.38/GD.xs Wed Dec 1

Bug in buildd for all except ix86 and sparc?

2002-01-10 Thread Patrick Ouellette
(Should have sent this to -devel, but had a brain cramp and sent it to -user first.) Hey all, I seem to be having a problem that is buildd specific. I uploaded my package (ax25-apps-0.0.5-5) from ix86 after fixing problems on the non ix86 archs (working on merulo). It builds fine on merulo manu

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Actually the attached patch is the "correct one". There is no need to memset and you should use PATH_MAX rather than 4096. Jeff On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 23:36, Jonathan Walther wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:38:43PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > >Oops, copy/paste-o when migrating the patch t

Re: Bug in buildd for all except ix86 and sparc?

2002-01-10 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Patrick Ouellette wrote: > manually (with debuild) but dies when the build daemon tries with > a 'cannot run configure.sub' error. > > Anyone else have this problem? Is it a "feature" or a bug? Are you sure you are not missing a build dependency? The build daemon runs inside

Re: Installed wajig 0.2.11-1 (i386 source)

2002-01-10 Thread Malcolm Parsons
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:07:06PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Malcolm Parsons wrote: > > > python modules should be supplied as source, and byte compiled in the > > postinst. > > No, they should be byte compiled during package creation. There is no point byte compiling during

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Adam Olsen
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:38:30PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Actually the attached patch is the "correct one". There is no need to > memset and you should use PATH_MAX rather than 4096. No, the "correct" way is to malloc the space as needed. PATH_MAX doesn't exist on the Hurd. -- Adam O

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:38:30PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Actually the attached patch is the "correct one". There is no need to > memset and you should use PATH_MAX rather than 4096. Both is incorrect. PATH_MAX isn't required by POSIX and some systems don't have it (the Hurd for example)

Re: Bug in buildd for all except ix86 and sparc?

2002-01-10 Thread James Troup
Package: ax25-apps Version: 0.0.5-5 Severity: serious Patrick Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyone else have this problem? Is it a "feature" or a bug? It's a bug in your package. | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/scratch/ax25-apps$ dpkg-source -x ax25-apps_0.0.5-5.dsc | dpkg-source: extracting

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
While I agree with your statements, it's strictly not possible in this case - realpath() requires that the second argument be a string buffer of size PATH_MAX (read the manpage). SYNOPSIS #include char *realpath(const char *file_name, char *resolved_name); DESCRIPTION The realpat

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Moritz Schulte
Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While I agree with your statements, it's strictly not possible in > this case - realpath() requires that the second argument be a string > buffer of size PATH_MAX (read the manpage). What about using canonicalize_file_name() instead whenever that fun

Re: Installed wajig 0.2.11-1 (i386 source)

2002-01-10 Thread Adam Heath
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Malcolm Parsons wrote: > There is no point byte compiling during package creation, as every time > the python2.{1,2} packages are upgraded, every .py file is byte > compiled again anyway: > > python2.2.postinst: > for i in $DIRLIST ; do > /usr/bin/python2.2

[광고]새해에는 다같이...

2002-01-10 Thread hana
메일 내용이 보이지않으세요? 여기를 클릭하세요...

Re: [ccheney@cheney.cx: libqt2 libpng2 resolution]

2002-01-10 Thread Herbert Xu
Anthony Towns wrote: > There's nothing wrong with having libfoo-dev require libpng3 and bar > require libqt which needs libpng2; and it's completely reasonable to > expect to be able to build programs based on libfoo or libqt on a single > system without having to run apt-get in the meantime. ..

Re: serious bug. Evolution and Microsoft mentality.

2002-01-10 Thread Erik Steffl
Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Erik Steffl wrote: > > > Tomas Pospisek's Mail Lists wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:36:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > IMO IMAP is still a PITA, AF

Debian non-free mirror? Where are they?

2002-01-10 Thread Otto Wyss
I considered to include Debian non-free into my synchronisation scripts (see "http://dpartialmirror.sourceforge.net/";) but I couldn't find any mirror nor any information about. Where is non-free located? O. Wyss

Re: [kde] and, for my next trick ...

2002-01-10 Thread Ben Burton
> The libpng[23] screwup in unstable is now more or less resolved with > kde{base,graphics,network} in incoming. Now, the only packages that need > rebuilding are kdeaddons, kinkatta, kmerlin, koffice, and maybe kdetoys > (not sure on that one - Ben?). kdelibs was installed last night. I don't be

Re: Debian non-free mirror? Where are they?

2002-01-10 Thread Ian Eure
On Thursday 10 January 2002 01:42 pm, Otto Wyss wrote: > I considered to include Debian non-free into my synchronisation scripts > (see "http://dpartialmirror.sourceforge.net/";) but I couldn't find any > mirror nor any information about. Where is non-free located? > mm, all (or nearly all) debian

Re: Bug in buildd for all except ix86 and sparc?

2002-01-10 Thread Patrick Ouellette
Yes, that's the apparent problem. On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:38:35PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:38:35 -0200 > From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Patrick Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org > Subject

Unidentified subject!

2002-01-10 Thread martin f krafft
merge 125674 125866 merge 127574 128226 thanks after hours of messing with squirrelmail last night, i think i have reason to do this. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] kill ugly radio

squirrelmail: apache/php and register_globals

2002-01-10 Thread martin f krafft
i know that this should probably go upstream or to the apache mailing list(s), but spare me the time and trouble, i consider it more important to report it at least somewhere... and maybe this is just debian-related... i upgraded to squirrelmail 1.2.2 with the .deb package from the webpage[1] (had

Bug#128666: ITP: aris-extractor -- Log parsing tool for the ARIS Incidents Database system

2002-01-10 Thread Matt Zimmerman
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-10 Severity: wishlist * Package name: aris-extractor Version : 1.6 Upstream Author : SecurityFocus * URL : http://aris.securityfocus.com/ * License : See below (PLEASE COMMENT on freeness) Description : Log pars

Don't let em make ya quit.

2002-01-10 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
http://www.crn.com/sections/BreakingNews/dailyarchives.asp?ArticleID=32424> No matter how ugly they get, don't become what you most hate. Let's win this fair and square, folks. And we will win, we have superiour technology and all the source code... but that's what they'll say. Build on str

Re: Musixtex not going into testing?

2002-01-10 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: "Tille, Andreas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Musixtex not going into testing? Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:47:28 +0100 (CET) > musixtex | 1:0.102-1 | unstable | source, alpha, i386, m68k, s390 > > I doubt the problem is that MusixTex unfortunately has to stay in > non-free and there a

Re: Bug in buildd for all except ix86 and sparc?

2002-01-10 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:30:56PM +, James Troup wrote: > Package: ax25-apps > Version: 0.0.5-5 > Severity: serious > > Patrick Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Anyone else have this problem? Is it a "feature" or a bug? > > It's a bug in your package. > > | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/

Re: squirrelmail: apache/php and register_globals

2002-01-10 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, martin f krafft wrote: > the php.ini setting works perfectly, *unless* you try to override it, in > which case it will *always* and *automatically*, without warning, and > without futher ado, turn itself off by the time that the first actual > script is parsed. this should not

Re: Do not link GNOME1 apps with libpng3

2002-01-10 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 05:09:41PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: > >> "SMR" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:37:17PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: > > [...] > > >> See Colin's answer. Change the library soname and shlibs. This will > >> solve

[±¤°í] 1/4 ½ÇÁ÷ÀÚ ¹«·áIT±³À°

2002-01-10 Thread ITÀü¹®Çб³
Title: ::: The 2002 1/4 IT Specialist Course ::: ▒ 국내 최고의 CIW 국제공인 전문가들이 전수하는 생생한 실무 교육 ▒ 실무 Process를 총망라하여 체계적으로 접근 ▒ 다양한 Case Study와 현장 실습 등을 통한 실용적 학습 체제 ▒ 6개월 간의 전문가 양성교육 노동부 지원의 고학력 미취업자 대상의 실무위주 교육 ◈인터넷 비지니스 프로그래밍 교육 과정 포토샵,드림

Re: Do not link GNOME1 apps with libpng3

2002-01-10 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:07:26PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > On 09 Jan 2002 15:09:08 +0100 > Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Now, the question is: should GNOME move to libpng3, and how? The QT/KDE > > > folks have sidestepped the problem by declaring that libqt2

Re: Do not link GNOME1 apps with libpng3

2002-01-10 Thread Christian Marillat
>> "SMR" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> Then i'll rebuild gnome-help and my other packages who depends on imlib >> against the new imlib. This will take 2 hours, and the problem is gone. > Yes, but until that happens, gnome-help is broken. > It would be nice if you fixed

Scheduled downtime for murphy.debian.org(lists.debian.org)

2002-01-10 Thread Adam Heath
Brainfood is scheduling downtime for murphy.debian.org(which is also lists.debian.org, and runs all the mailing lists), to do a disk upgrade. This is just the addition of a new drive, with no copying of the existing data. We expect downtime to be minimal. The time for this maintenance is schedul

Re: squirrelmail: apache/php and register_globals

2002-01-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.11.0253 +0100]: > > the php.ini setting works perfectly, *unless* you try to override it, in > > which case it will *always* and *automatically*, without warning, and > > without futher ado, turn itself off by the time that the f

GPG key signing: Wisconsin.

2002-01-10 Thread Scott Dier
I'm going to Milwaukee, Wisconsin from Minneapolis, Minnesota this weekend, and I want to let developers and non-developers alike that if they need a gpg key signing to let me know in private. Thanks! -- Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ringworld.org/ the desire for space travel is a m

Re: Scheduled downtime for murphy.debian.org(lists.debian.org)

2002-01-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.11.0351 +0100]: > The time for this maintenance is scheduled for Friday, January 11, at > 9pm UTC. This is 3pm local time, for murphy. cool! finally a better reason to stop writing debian list mail than work ;) -- martin; (greeting

20¸í¸¸ °¡ÀÔÇϸé 3330¸¸¿ø ÁØ´Ù...ÃÖ°íÀÇ ÆÄÆ®³Ê µ·ÁÖ±â

2002-01-10 Thread fdfd
Title: Untitled Document       추천인 20명만 모으면 정말 만원을 드립니다. 단 자신의 2단계,3단계,4단계 추천회원들도 각각 20명씩 모아야 합니다. 하지만 걱정하지 마세요. 토마토걸 파트너쉽 프로그램에서는 자신의 하위추천인정보를 볼 수 있으므로 하위추천인들에게 연락이 가능합니다. 그래서 추천인 모으는법을 가르쳐 주세요. 그렇게만 하면 1명당 20명 모으는것은 식은죽 먹기 입니다.   추천인 수익올리는 방법 추천인을 모으려면 저희가 부여하는 코드를 홈페

Re: Scheduled downtime for murphy.debian.org(lists.debian.org)

2002-01-10 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:51:53PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > Brainfood is scheduling downtime for murphy.debian.org(which is also > lists.debian.org, and runs all the mailing lists), to do a disk upgrade. This > is just the addition of a new drive, with no copying of the existing data. We > exp