Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This again means that we need to encourage more maintainers to work on
> multi-package-solution and to skip the 300-mini-cathedral-situation.
> Only few people are working on package that are not maintained by
> them, this needs to be re-considered.
I'm
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 02:35:01PM -0700, David Welton wrote:
> > RedHat for one doesn't care for this, so I think it's one of the
> > examples of what Debian is doing for Free Software with its
> > clear and visible ideological organization.
>
> Well, except for the fact that they are pumping 100
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
On the subject of ircII, thanks David, your effort is GREATLY appreciated.
> > > RedHat for one doesn't care for this, so I think it's one of the
> > > examples of what Debian is doing for Free Software with its
> > > clear and visi
Astrolog is a many featured and customizable astrology chart calculation
program for DOS, Windows, Mac, and Unix, used in 30+ countries on six
continents. It is 100% freeware and requires no registration fee. :) The
complete source code is available . Astrolog features: wheels, aspects,
midpoints,
At 21:20 -0700 1998-06-05, Steve Dunham wrote:
>Does anyone have any definite information on the Corel Network
>computers? Is anyone else interested in doing a Debian port?
Vincent Renardias is apparently working on an arm port of Debian (In bug
#21327 against ftp.debian.org, he asks for a binary
At 18:29 -0700 1998-06-08, Richard Braakman wrote:
>Package: login
>Maintainer: Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 22191 login: does not chown /dev/vcs* anymore
As I quoted in a reply to 22191:
Here's what the author says in libmisc/chowntty.c:
#ifdef __linux__
/*
* Please don't a
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yann Dirson writes:
> > Hm, assuming the "b1" means it's beta stuff, I think it would be
> > better to keep it in the Debian version. Changing the version number
>
> Yes, but then slink is also beta.
>
> > * heavily using epochs
>
> I HATE epochs!
Hi all,
I finally got around to releasing my old module player, a few people were
vaugely interested.
It is maintainerless (completely) unless somone wants to pick up, I've put
the source at http://www.debian.org/~jgg/muse it compiles and appears to
run OK under ALSA/OSS on latest-hamm.
The re
On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 09:31:01AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Michael" == Michael Bramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> If the the size information isn't in the debian-package,
> Michael> then i must download two files (NAME-VERSION.deb and
> Michael> NAME-VERSION.size.gz) or
Pre-release .debs (still under construction). 24 of 'em, more to
come.
ftp://ftp.jimpick.com/pub/debian/testing/
Be fore-warned - they've hardly been tested. Also, the imlib packages
aren't the real ones - they're just quick hacks so I could compile the
rest. Sean Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 21:20 -0700 1998-06-05, Steve Dunham wrote:
> >Does anyone have any definite information on the Corel Network
> >computers? Is anyone else interested in doing a Debian port?
>
> Vincent Renardias is apparently working on an arm port of Debian (In bu
Michael Meskes wrote:
> Here's a list of my packages. It also contains the packages for which I made
> the last non-maintainer upload.
[...]
> djtools 1.0-2
I'll take djtools if it hasn't already gone.
- Craig (sitting on the end of a dead 7513 :< )
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP:
It seems that the newest 'Packages' files in the slink distribution
are from May 30th. Is there a problem?
-tor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 23125 general
Bug#23125: Hamm generation with FTP
Bug assigned to package `general'.
> reassign 23174 pppupd
Bug#23174: can't remobe old version of pppupd
Bug assigned to package `pppupd'.
> reassign 23252 xbase
Bug#23252: error in x-base con
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 12:37:17AM -0700, Tor Slettnes wrote:
>
> It seems that the newest 'Packages' files in the slink distribution
> are from May 30th. Is there a problem?
Yes. See also
http://www.infodrom.north.de/Debian/Bugs/db/23/23306.html
Regards,
Joey
--
/ Martin Schulze
You wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> > Since a few days, I'm unable to connect to ftp1.us.debian.org.
> > I always get an error "530 Unable to chdir.". Could somebody look
> > into this ?
>
> Netgod "stole" its disk in order to produce some Debian CD-ROMs
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Joel Klecker wrote:
> At 21:20 -0700 1998-06-05, Steve Dunham wrote:
> >Does anyone have any definite information on the Corel Network
> >computers? Is anyone else interested in doing a Debian port?
>
> Vincent Renardias is apparently working on an arm port of Debian (In bug
> You wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> > > Since a few days, I'm unable to connect to ftp1.us.debian.org.
> > > I always get an error "530 Unable to chdir.". Could somebody look
> > > into this ?
> >
> > Netgod "stole" its disk in order to produce some
I downloaded the sources for the 2.0.34 kernel and did a quick look through
the files. The fat-32 patches do not seem to be in here. If 2.0.34 is to
be released as a debian package, then I hope all of the patches that are in
the 2.0.33 package are added.
Also has anyone packaged the Real Time li
hi all,
why is mutt compiled without pgp-support as default?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jun 1998 13:57:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#23125: Hamm generation with FTP
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 02:10:52PM +0200, Michael Dietrich wrote:
> why is mutt compiled without pgp-support as default?
Because of US export restrictions on software containing cryptographic code.
The version that's available from ftp.debian.org and its mirrors ("mutt") is
compiled without PGP s
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 07:42:27AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded the sources for the 2.0.34 kernel and did a quick look through
> the files. The fat-32 patches do not seem to be in here. If 2.0.34 is to
> be released as a debian package, then I hope all of the patches that are in
Hi all... another comment from the peanut gallery (i.e., non-voter) :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> We _must_ have a vi (or at worst, vi clone) available in the base
> system.
Why? I think you see vi as I see gpm and they see mc: as an "essential
convenience".
Fact about VI: it has two modes whic
Hello,
I will upload a new version of ircII with a note on the free copyright and
some minor fixes later this week.
Have a nice day.
eckes
--
(OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
( .. ) [EMAIL PROTECTED],linux.de,debian.org} http://home.pages.de/~eckes/
o--o *plush* 2048/93600EFD [EMA
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 02:56:44PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> The bug report pretty much says:
> xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok)
>
> What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration
> problem. I personally do not have/use samba, but I
Richard Braakman writes:
> Dennis L. Clark wrote:
> > Can anyone think of an automated way to weed out bug reports on versions
> > which haven't been released into hamm from the release-critical list? A
> > quick fix would be to modify the priority of the bug report, but that
> > would be The
Dale Scheetz writes:
> Second: this was supposidly the last pre-release before the final version,
> and I wanted it to get some testing.
>
> I will be coming out with a "final" Debian version in the next week or
> two, depending on how much Ulrich stonewalls the upstream release.
Hm... it wi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> As far as being 'happy' about it.. well, it's nice that it's cleared
> up, but.. I don't think we changed much other than some licensing
> details. This software wasn't intended to be non-free... If
> anything, I'm happy to put this behind me and get on with other
> thi
Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > At 21:20 -0700 1998-06-05, Steve Dunham wrote:
> > >Does anyone have any definite information on the Corel Network
> > >computers? Is anyone else interested in doing a Debian port?
> > Vincent Renardias is appar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sun, 7 Jun 1998, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen Carpenter wrote:
> > I would supose that it is not very common to run both xfs and xfstt on the
> > same machine (esp since xfstt currently only accepts 1 simultaneous
> > connection --something I hope to change) b
Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why? I think you see vi as I see gpm and they see mc: as an "essential
> convenience".
vi has the advantage of being backward compatible into the early '80s.
The only unix editors which vie with vi for standardness are ed (the
unix standard), and emacs (backwards
Hi Brian,
Bug #22325, marked important, says that my package guavac has an
unsatisfied suggestion on java-virtual-machine. I need your
advice on what to do about it.
My thoughts are:
1. It's a suggestion only, so nothing will break if it doesn't exist.
Unfortunately dselect is a bit picky abo
Just briefly: we will _not_ be voting on release process/
architecture. This is a technical decision, and is therefore up to
the developers concerned (Brian, mainly), and the Technical Committee.
Technical design and decisions must not be left to a vote.
I'll be making another posting about techn
I think that in order to make sense of what's being said here we need
to step back a bit, and think about abstractions rather than
implementation. Lots of people (myself included) have been posting
rather detailed proposals.
Q. What are we trying to achieve ?
A. There are two possibilities that
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why? I think you see vi as I see gpm and they see mc: as an "essential
> > convenience".
>
> vi has the advantage of being backward compatible into the early '80s.
>
> The only unix editors which vie with vi for standa
Jim writes ("Re: so what? Re: Debian development modem "):
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > We must decouple our development tracks much more. I propose that we
> > resolve never again to plan a release with is not fully backward
> > compatible with the current stable version.
>
> I like this idea
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 01:22:33AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >
> > Documentation may be included in main so long as there are no restrictions
> > on the unmodified use of the documentation
* James Troup (Sun, Jun 07, 1998 at 07:47:21PM +0100)
>
> Blah. An even quicker ldd reveals this is already not the case.
>
> 20:45:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ~ $ldd /usr/bin/perl | grep gdbm
> libgdbm.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgdbm.so.1 (0x40015000)
> 20:46:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ~ $
>
> Until _that_ ch
Bdale Garbee writes ("Re: namespace pollution in bind?"):
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> : ... lintian flags the 'mx' and 'ns' commands as possible namespace
> pollution.
>
> Ok, I'm convinced. The 8.1.2-2 package still includes these commands, and I
> will leave them in indefinit
Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This doesn't touch the fact that MC would be a very convenient
> additional feature for a user friendly Debian base system.
a) I don't think it would be, b) that's not what the proposal was; the
proposal was to remove ae *and elvis-tiny* from the base sys
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got to this a little late, but how about putting them in a
> subdirectory, like the mh commands are ? /usr/bin/dnsquery or some
> such.
>
> Then if you wanted these commands you could at it to your PATH.
That's overkill, and doesn't solve any problems.
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 05:28:46PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim) writes:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > We _must_ have a vi (or at worst, vi clone) available in the base
> > > system.
ME TOO
> This doesn't touch the fact that MC would be a very convenient additional
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I got to this a little late, but how about putting them in a
> > subdirectory, like the mh commands are ? /usr/bin/dnsquery or some
> > such.
> >
> > Then if you wanted these commands you could at it to your PAT
Hi,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The bug report pretty much says:
> xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok)
>
> What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration
> problem. I personally do not have/use samba, but I know of at lea
Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I bet we could brow-beat Corel into donating a few boxes. I heard
> > they go as cheap as $300 US for a diskless configuration.
>
> It's all just rumors, I've heard nothing back from them. We might
> have to brow-beat them into selling boxes.
You
severity 20250 important
severity 17381 important
severity 19218 important
severity 19991 important
severity 21812 important
merge 20250 17381 19218 19991 21812
thanks
(What follows is described already by Florian Hinzmann in Bug #21812)
To reproduce this error, I have created two packages "foo"
Is there anyway there could be a variable set that says "do not install
/usr/doc files"? This way those who do not want the docs can go on w/o
them.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 08:02:05PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This again means that we need to encourage more maintainers to work on
> > multi-package-solution and to skip the 300-mini-cathedral-situation.
> > Only few people are working on package tha
Gregory S. Stark writes:
> this problem keeps coming up. i was thinking it would be handy to have a
> character that is defined to sort before 0 and before the empty string.
> tilde seems like the best choice to me, so something like:
>
> krb4-0.9.9~980514
> fltk-0.9.9~980527
> mpsql-2.0~
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 06:14:16PM -0700, Tom Lear wrote:
> 100% freeware of course means it has to go into non-free, because of a
> plethora of copyrights, all less than acceptable.
:)
> Any objections?
Not as long the scientific software overcounts the pseudo-scientific :)
Marcus
stud. rer.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Shaleh wrote:
> Is there anyway there could be a variable set that says "do not install
> /usr/doc files"? This way those who do not want the docs can go on w/o
> them.
That would not fix Bug #17381 (overwriting /usr/include/linux), for
exa
> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why? I think you see vi as I see gpm and they see mc: as an "essential
> > > convenience".
> >
> > vi has the advantage of being backward compatible into the early '80s.
> >
> > The only unix editors which vie
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
: We need to think about what kinds of thing need to happen to a package
: or to a distribution before we release it as `stable'.
Yes.
I find it impossible to completely divorce the conceptual model from any
reference to details of the present or any pro
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 04:21:57PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think that in order to make sense of what's being said here we need
> to step back a bit, and think about abstractions rather than
> implementation. Lots of people (myself included) have been posting
> rather detailed proposals.
>
>
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded the sources for the 2.0.34 kernel and did a quick look through
> the files. The fat-32 patches do not seem to be in here. If 2.0.34 is to
> be released as a debian package, then I hope all of the patches that are in
> the 2.0.33 package
Jim Pick wrote:
>
> Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > I bet we could brow-beat Corel into donating a few boxes. I heard
> > > they go as cheap as $300 US for a diskless configuration.
> >
> > It's all just rumors, I've heard nothing back from them. We might
> > have to brow-beat
Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They are only giving discounts to OCLUG members, but since I'm in OCLUG,
> I could probably approach the appropriate people to do some enquiries.
> I wouldn't hold your breath though. OCLUG is very RedHat based.
I've talked to some of the Corel guys
"Bob" == Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> conclude that it probably is there (maybe in a different form
Bob> than the patches).
Bob> As usual, the documentation lags the code, of course.
The documentation is off on Alan Cox's site -- it seems you have to
activate NLS support and UTF8
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> severity 20250 important
> severity 17381 important
> severity 19218 important
> severity 19991 important
> severity 21812 important
> merge 20250 17381 19218 19991 21812
> thanks
Please note that --force-overwrite really has to be turned back on by
def
Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't ease of use more important than standardness when it comes to
> an editor to be used for a rescue situation? I think that I would try
> doing an alternative set of boot disks to see how folx liked them. Is
> it possible to make mc use vi? On the rescue disk, s
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>What is it people see in vi in terms of _using_ it? My opinion FWIW is that
>vi's presentation rivals that of dselect in general, with vi inching dselect
>out for not forcing one to follow a
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe we should raise our demands to our developers: We should probably make
> clear *before* someone wants to become a developer that the job of a
> developer is not only care about the packages he/she maintains, but also the
> quality of the whole dis
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 11:02:55AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why? I think you see vi as I see gpm and they see mc: as an "essential
> > convenience".
>
> vi has the advantage of being backward compatible into the early '80s.
>
> The only unix editors which vi
Debian Developers,
I recently upgraded to the hamm distribution. Ever since the upgrade I
have not been able to compile anything with gcc. Even a simple hello
world program fails to compile. Example:
/* hello world */
#include
int main(void)
{
printf("Hello world!\n");
return 0;
}
/* end h
Mark W. Eichin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What about the idea of running the x server directly from init,
> > and using xdmcp? Is that bogus?
>
> In fact, someone sent in reasonable-looking patches that do just that,
> not long before I stopped working on X; they should be in one of the X
> b
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Dale Scheetz writes:
> > Second: this was supposidly the last pre-release before the final version,
> > and I wanted it to get some testing.
> >
> > I will be coming out with a "final" Debian version in the next week or
> > two, depending on how much
As listed in The Hamm Bugs Stamp-Out List for 1998-06-08, p3nfs is still
linked against libc5, and the maintainer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Billy
C.-M. Chow) cannot be contacted.
I have looked on ftp.uni-elargen.de:/pub/psion3/local/utilities and found a
glibc diff for ve
Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > They are only giving discounts to OCLUG members, but since I'm in OCLUG,
> > I could probably approach the appropriate people to do some enquiries.
> > I wouldn't hold your breath though. OCLUG is very RedHat b
They are not out yet. I think they are talking August 1.
Pre-production demos/betas are floating around. I played w/ one of
these at Linux Expo. Currently it is a mix of a.out and ELF and RH 4.2
kludged w/ 5.x. So the software is flaky and the compilation tools are
still being tweaked. On top
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > The bug report pretty much says:
> > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok)
> >
> > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration
> > proble
Steve Dunham wrote:
>
> I'd like to see the Corel Computers used as generic cheap Linux
> Computers. They are reported to be fairly cheap, perform reasonably
> well and have lots of neat I/O features. (NTSC in/out, 2 ethernet
> ports.)
The demo I saw seemed to show the Netwinder to be pretty fa
Jim Pick wrote:
>
> Sign me up - I can come up with $1000 CDN no problem.
Drat. Sorry. I just talked to one of the Netwinder developpers. It
doesn't sound like they are selling the Netwinder yet. Even to
developpers. Just lending them out. Although I get the feeling that
they will start sel
Looks like you guys can talk to Chris or San directly about Netwinder
development if you wish.
Later,
Behan
--
Behan Webster mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1-613-224-7547 http://www.verisim.com/
--- Begin Message ---
Greetings Behan;
Nice to see you comming on board. Here are the offical cont
I haven't tested it, but it really looks like Gordon Chaffee's
patches are included.
homey 4 > rgrep -i -r 'fat32' .
./fs/fat/cache.c: fat_bits == 16 ? EOF_FAT16 :
EOF_FAT3
2);
./fs/fat/inode.c: int fat32;
./fs/fat/in
Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When/if they are ready and Corel doesn't want to sell them directly,
> someone like varesearch or linuxmall could be convinced to become
> resellers. (Or even Red Hat would be interesting...)
Even non-traditional channels could resell them (as long as
Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I also have an offer from one of Brian's friends (he was lent one of the
> Netwinders). He is willing to give a few people accounts on his
> Netwinder. He just has a few security concerns to address first (he's
> got to pick up a hub to connect the Ne
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 12:55:53PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I have moved msql 2.0.3-4 into Incoming/REJECT
>
> - Forwarded message from James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) writes:
>
> >* Added pre-dependency for passwd to msqld as its tools
Hi,
I just tried to download the gnu/egcs c++ and c compilers, but I couldn't
because the versions in the packagelist and of the actual packages don't
match.
I looked in:
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/
an example is egcs g++:
in Packages:
Package: g++
Version: 2
Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looks like you guys can talk to Chris or San directly about Netwinder
> development if you wish.
I just phoned Chris Herrnberger (the OCLUG guy), and quizzed him.
He says Corel has loaned OCLUG ten Netwinders for development
purposes. If we want to g
Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As for the machines, he says the developers versions are the
> top-of-the-line model, with a 3.1 GB hard drive and 64 MB of RAM. I
> think they are based on a 233MHz StrongARM.
^^
Oops, make that a 275MHz StrongARM. I found
Hello Fabien!
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 10:41:38AM -0500, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand you well but here is my opinions about freeness
> of Documentation:
>
> Documentation describing the functionnality of a software are dependant
> of the software. Then, they should be consid
Hi,
> > I have just installed dhcp-1.0.1-1 (replacing dhcp-1.0.0-3) and now
> > all my clients are unable to renew their leases. I deleted the old
> > dhcp-1.0.0-3 in my local mirror so I am unable to downgrade. Does
> > anyone keep an old package around that can send to me or put for FTP
> > some
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 03:55:58PM +0200, Mirek Kwasniak wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 02:56:44PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> > The bug report pretty much says:
> > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok)
> >
> > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 12:30:50PM -0400, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > The bug report pretty much says:
> > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok)
> >
> > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user con
Remco Blaakmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, I did wonder why you stopped answering my messages.
Sorry about that Remco, my apologies :-( I guess I got kind of busy +
was afraid of dealing with xinetd, something I have never touched
before :-)
>> Today I e-mailed Jeremy Allison (from the Sa
Thanks to everyone that pointed out that the fat32 patches ARE in 2.0.34.
I assumed that fat32 remained a configure option, but it appears that it is
now a standard feature (of fat). At least that's why I could not find any
reference to fat32 in the configure scripts.
It must be a mess for the ke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Alright, the more I think about this, the more I think that James
is probably right. (NO flames, people can change there minds can't they?)
Mc doesn't belong in the base set. However I do think more attention
should be paid to the user. (not alot more ju
On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Joel Klecker wrote:
> At 18:29 -0700 1998-06-08, Richard Braakman wrote:
> >Package: login
> >Maintainer: Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 22191 login: does not chown /dev/vcs* anymore
>
> As I quoted in a reply to 22191:
>
> Here's what the author says in libmisc/chowntty.
Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bug report pretty much says:
> xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok)
>
> What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration
> problem. I personally do not have/use samba, but I know of at least 2 p
Hi,
I'm helping to organize an effort to port Debian GNU/Linux to run
on the new Corel NetWinder NCs ( http://www.corelcomputer.com/ ).
Debian GNU/Linux is the largest Linux distribution, with over 1500
packages and ports to Intel, Alpha, m68k, PowerPC and Sparc. It is
being developer entirely
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > > On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > >
> > > Documentation may be include
92 matches
Mail list logo
