Remco Blaakmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, I did wonder why you stopped answering my messages.
Sorry about that Remco, my apologies :-( I guess I got kind of busy + was afraid of dealing with xinetd, something I have never touched before :-) >> Today I e-mailed Jeremy Allison (from the Samba team) asking about >> issues to run Samba from xinetd. I am waiting for his reponse. > > Fine. No answer so far... >> Yesterday I searched the Samba mail archives for any information regarding >> xinetd and did not find anything with the word "xinetd". > > :-( Does this mean the bug has been found by Debian users only and that it > hasn't been forwarded upstream? I have no idea. Can it be that not too many people use xinetd? >> One other thing: it is my understanding that the other Samba daemon >> (smbd) works fine with xinetd; the problem is with nmbd. Can anyone >> confirm this? > > Yes, I can. smbd works fine under xinetd, the problem is with nmbd only. And what about a configuration problem? Can it be that we need a very special and wird parameter in xinetd to make it work with nmbd (or the opposite way)? Bye for now. I guess I'm going for xinetd now. Wish me look as I guess I'll learn new things today... E.- -- Eloy A. Paris Information Technology Department Rockwell Automation Venezuela Telephone: +58-2-9432311 Fax: +58-2-9431645 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
