On Wed, Dec 03 2008, Noah Slater wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 10:52:39AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> Why do you need a separate mailing list for a single proposal? Please
>> discuss this on debian-devel or debian-project, which are already perfectly
>> adequate lists for this.
>
> We hav
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:04:14PM +, Noah Slater wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:50:22PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:26:03PM +, Noah Slater wrote:
> > > How should we go about collecting to the contributers? Should I post
> > > a note to the wiki (al
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 09:50:15AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Rendez-vous after Lenny release on -devel :)
Heh heh. Sure thing, Charles.
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Le Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 08:52:17PM +, Noah Slater a écrit :
>
> We have struggled enough with the proposal as it is. My fear is that
> discussing
> it on debian-devel will open it up to "fire-and-forget" criticism that lacks
> context of previous discussions, is poorly thought out, results in
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 10:52:39AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:49:25AM +, Noah Slater wrote:
> > As one of the primary contributers to the copyright proposal I would
> > obviously
> > like to be involved in its ratification. I am guessing some of the other
> > ma
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:49:25AM +, Noah Slater wrote:
> As one of the primary contributers to the copyright proposal I would obviously
> like to be involved in its ratification. I am guessing some of the other main
> contributers would like to be involved too.
> To get this started we need
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:50:22PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:26:03PM +, Noah Slater wrote:
> > How should we go about collecting to the contributers? Should I post
> > a note to the wiki (alerting the subscribers) about this, and if so,
> > where to direct pe
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:57:33PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > As one of the primary contributers to the copyright proposal I would
> > obviously like to be involved in its ratification. I am guessing some of the
> > other main contributers would like to be involved too.
>
> Great, then maybe
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:26:03PM +, Noah Slater wrote:
> How should we go about collecting to the contributers? Should I post
> a note to the wiki (alerting the subscribers) about this, and if so,
> where to direct people for collaboration?
It is up to you. From a management point of view, I
Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:25:20PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > The solution to your problem already exists (actually, it has been
>> > *designed* for that): http://wiki.debian.org/Proposa
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:18:35PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
> The wish for encoding licenses in debtags categories periodically shows
> up, so I collected some pointers to old discussions in the FAQ:
>
>
> http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/faq.html#any-reason-why-there-are-no-license-tags-in-de
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:46:29PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that
> > users can filter out the ones they don't wont easily. I don't object
[...]
> Except that
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:05:56PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:49:25AM +, Noah Slater wrote:
> > To get this started we need a mailing list and a repository, then we
> > can place a notice on the wiki directing people to the mailing list
> > and make the wiki p
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:49:25AM +, Noah Slater wrote:
> To get this started we need a mailing list and a repository, then we
> can place a notice on the wiki directing people to the mailing list
> and make the wiki page immutable so that there is no confusion.
Come on, do you really need al
Hey,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:25:20PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The solution to your problem already exists (actually, it has been
> > *designed* for that): http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
> > , it "just" needs someone w
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The solution to your problem already exists (actually, it has been
> *designed* for that): http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
> , it "just" needs someone with the energy of finalizing the proposal
> (most likely via a DEP), so that is
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:16:44PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Except that debtags are right now for binary packages, whereas
> > copyright is for source packages.
>
> Err, not quite right:
>
> Policy 4.5:
> > Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright and
> > di
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[...]
> Except that debtags are right now for binary packages, whereas
> copyright is for source packages.
Err, not quite right:
Policy 4.5:
> Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright and
> distribution license in the file */usr/share/doc/pac
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2008/12/2 Karl Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Would something like apt-listbugs work? I know it doesnt address the
>> offline issue, but seems to fit as a concept for the rest of the
>> problem.
>
> Yep, that should be enough, as long as there is a way (with some
> possible
Miriam Ruiz dijo [Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:51:04PM +0100]:
> > The solution to your problem already exists (actually, it has been
> > *designed* for that): http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
> > , it "just" needs someone with the energy of finalizing the proposal
> > (most likely via a
2008/12/2 Karl Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Would something like apt-listbugs work? I know it doesnt address the
> offline issue, but seems to fit as a concept for the rest of the
> problem.
Yep, that should be enough, as long as there is a way (with some
possible development in the future) for a
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 22:36:15 +0100
"Miriam Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/12/2 Drake Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Quoth Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2008-12-02 21:51:04 +0100:
> >> Well, not exactly, you cannot easily see the copyright file before
> >> installing the package, can
2008/12/2 Drake Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoth Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2008-12-02 21:51:04 +0100:
>> Well, not exactly, you cannot easily see the copyright file before
>> installing the package, can you?
>
> p.d.o appears to permit viewing copyright files of packages currently
> in
Quoth Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2008-12-02 21:51:04 +0100:
> Well, not exactly, you cannot easily see the copyright file before
> installing the package, can you?
p.d.o appears to permit viewing copyright files of packages currently
in the archive. As an example:
http://packages.deb
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2008/12/2 Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > [ M-F-T set to -devel ]
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> >> We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that
> >> users ca
2008/12/2 Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [ M-F-T set to -devel ]
>
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>> We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that
>> users can filter out the ones they don't wont easily. I don't object
>
> Except t
[ M-F-T set to -devel ]
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:30:54PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that
> users can filter out the ones they don't wont easily. I don't object
Except that debtags are right now for binary packages, whereas
copyr
27 matches
Mail list logo
