Le Dim 7 Mai 2006 05:49, Anthony DeRobertis a écrit :
> On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 09:35:16AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Could you please point me to an UNMERGED bug to see what it looks
> > like ? (an URL to the {status=closed ; resolution=merged} bug that
> > was reopen, as well as the bug in
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 09:35:16AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Could you please point me to an UNMERGED bug to see what it looks like ?
> (an URL to the {status=closed ; resolution=merged} bug that was reopen,
> as well as the bug in was merged "into").
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug
Le Ven 5 Mai 2006 05:49, Anthony DeRobertis a écrit :
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:21:41PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > * the forward canonization is vital for things like tracking
> > bugzilla's "merges" (it in fact rewrites a
> > $(uri)/show_bug.cgi?old_nnn into the $(uri)/show_bug.cgi?new_
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:21:41PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> * the forward canonization is vital for things like tracking bugzilla's
>"merges" (it in fact rewrites a $(uri)/show_bug.cgi?old_nnn into the
>$(uri)/show_bug.cgi?new_nnn)
Out of curiosity, how does it handle un-merges i
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This tool lists every BTS bug that is forwarded to a remote Bug
> Tracker. If it knows how to get a Status and possibly a Resolution (if
> the Status is a closing Status), it gets them, and:
> * sets upstrea
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 18:55, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> * Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 15:49]:
> > IMHO, in his case, he should remove the forward, tag the bug
> > upstream, and mention in the bug history that this is related to
> > the upstream bug "foo". set the forwarded state o
* Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 16:30]:
> after more pondering, what really miss for me, is a BTS
> "closed-upstream" tag, meaning that the bug is closed on the remote
> BTS, but not necessarily "fixed".
I don't think this distinction is helpful. Also, it's exactly
opposite to w
* Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 15:49]:
> IMHO, in his case, he should remove the forward, tag the bug
> upstream, and mention in the bug history that this is related to the
> upstream bug "foo". set the forwarded state of a bug does not makes
> sense to me, if you dont adhere to
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 17:54, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > It currently only support bugzilla (which would still help kde,
> > gnome, X.org, linux kernel, samba, mozilla, gcc Maintainers to cite
> > only them), but is written so th
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> It currently only support bugzilla (which would still help kde, gnome,
> X.org, linux kernel, samba, mozilla, gcc Maintainers to cite only them),
> but is written so that adding new backend is not a difficult task.
Could you plea
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 14:44, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> * Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 14:28]:
> > Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very
> > nice idea that no one will object to.
>
> Unfortunately, there are always corner cases. What if upstream marks
>
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 14:28, Christoph Berg a écrit :
> Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very
> nice idea that no one will object to.
>
> For 'upstream', I don't really see a benefit of setting it since the
> bug is already marked as forwarded. I would just leave it alone n
* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060503 14:45]:
> * Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 14:28]:
> > Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very
> > nice idea that no one will object to.
>
> Unfortunately, there are always corner cases. What if upstream mar
* Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 14:28]:
> Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very
> nice idea that no one will object to.
Unfortunately, there are always corner cases. What if upstream marks
something as fixed, you get a Debian bug report that the bug i
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 14:02, Alexander Sack a écrit :
> Anyway, I would have preferred to roll this out in a different
> fashion:
>
> 1. release it as a package so all maintainers can use the tool if
> they like.
I intended it like that at the begining. sadly, the tool uses a local
mirror of the d
Hi,
Re: Pierre Habouzit 2006-05-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * as of tags, it only touches (like I explained) :
>- upstream: ensure it's always set
>- wontfix: try to guess if upstream tagged that bug wontfix, and
>set/unset it accordingly
>- fixed-upstream:
>
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:21:41PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> btslink will *never* close or reopen bugs. So it's pretty harmless IMHO,
> this won't resurect a RC bug for which you made a debian-only patch and
> that is still not fixed upstream.
>
> So just tell me if somethings looks illogi
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 12:23, Alexander Sack a écrit :
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Hi developers,
> >
> > Like many of you may have noticed, a quite big mail was processed
> > by the BTS today [1]. This was generated by a new service I'm
> > currently devel
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> Hi developers,
>
> Like many of you may have noticed, a quite big mail was processed by
> the BTS today [1]. This was generated by a new service I'm currently
> developing, called bts-link.
>
>
> This tool lists every BT
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 11:56, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> How to Help:
>
> You can also help me to make the btslink.cfg more complete and
> know about more bugzillas [7]
about that:
* private or mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are fine
* any bugzilla that is used for a project packaged in debi
Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 12:06, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit :
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > So basically to trig it, you just have to set the right forward
> > status for your bugs.
>
> What is the "right" forward status? An URL for the upstream bug?
Exactly.
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> So basically to trig it, you just have to set the right forward status
> for your bugs.
What is the "right" forward status? An URL for the upstream bug?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
22 matches
Mail list logo
