Le Mer 3 Mai 2006 14:44, Martin Michlmayr a écrit : > * Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-03 14:28]: > > Automatically setting the 'fixed-upstream' tag is certainly a very > > nice idea that no one will object to. > > Unfortunately, there are always corner cases. What if upstream marks > something as fixed, you get a Debian bug report that the bug is still > there and you mark it as forwarded to the original bug report, > waiting for it to be reopened. In the meantime, the tool will tag > the bug as "fixed-upstream" which is obviously wrong.
after more pondering, what really miss for me, is a BTS "closed-upstream" tag, meaning that the bug is closed on the remote BTS, but not necessarily "fixed". that would make "fixed-upstream" be a tag btslink would ignore. How hard is it to add a debbugs tag ? do you think it worthes it ? or do you can live with a couple of mis-set fixed-upstream (that you can avoid by simply reseting the forward, like I think you should do anyway, but I reckon this is a personnal opinion) ? -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpyqysQVuG9d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
