Re: [Piuparts-devel] Migration to testing blocked by broken piuparts?

2020-01-09 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday, 9 January 2020 09:21:23 CET Paul Gevers wrote: > It's a wiki though, you can improve the > text if it's unclear to you. :-) I was not sure to have the right answer.. Now that I've understood, I've updated the wiki. All the best

Re: [Piuparts-devel] Migration to testing blocked by broken piuparts?

2020-01-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Dod, On 09-01-2020 09:17, Dominique Dumont wrote: > https://wiki.debian.org/piuparts/FAQ#Q._Can_I_somehow_tell_piuparts_to_retest_my_package.3F > > The answer mentions that package are not automatically retested. Whether this > applies to package > that passed or failed piupart test is not s

Re: [Piuparts-devel] Migration to testing blocked by broken piuparts?

2020-01-09 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Wednesday, 8 January 2020 20:42:45 CET Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > I checked the piuparts documentation just then [2] and found out that > > unlike ci.d.o or reproducible-build checks, the piuparts test will *not* > > automatically be retried for the same package of the same version (same > > up

Re: [Piuparts-devel] Migration to testing blocked by broken piuparts?

2020-01-08 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 08/01/2020 19.09, Boyuan Yang wrote: > 在 2020-01-08三的 16:36 +0530,Pirate Praveen写道: >> >> On വ്യാ, Jan 2, 2020 at 21:43, debacle >> wrote: >>> On 2020-01-02 11:53, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: El jue., 2 ene. 2020 08:28, Julien Cristau escribió: > No, it'll eve

Re: Migration to testing blocked by broken piuparts?

2020-01-08 Thread Boyuan Yang
在 2020-01-08三的 16:36 +0530,Pirate Praveen写道: > > On വ്യാ, Jan 2, 2020 at 21:43, debacle > wrote: > > On 2020-01-02 11:53, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > > El jue., 2 ene. 2020 08:28, Julien Cristau > > > escribió: > > > > No, it'll eventually get retried and (assuming it pass

Re: Migration to testing blocked by broken piuparts?

2020-01-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വ്യാ, Jan 2, 2020 at 21:43, debacle wrote: On 2020-01-02 11:53, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: El jue., 2 ene. 2020 08:28, Julien Cristau escribió: > No, it'll eventually get retried and (assuming it passes) the migration > block will lift. And "eventually" is normall

Re: Migration to testing blocked by broken piuparts?

2020-01-02 Thread debacle
On 2020-01-02 11:53, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > El jue., 2 ene. 2020 08:28, Julien Cristau escribió: > > No, it'll eventually get retried and (assuming it passes) the migration > > block will lift. > > And "eventually" is normally how many days? If I've learned one thing in Debi

Re: Migration to testing blocked by broken piuparts?

2020-01-02 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi! El jue., 2 ene. 2020 08:28, Julien Cristau escribió: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 12:03:43 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > two packages[ą, ˛] I uploaded are "Rejected due to piuparts > > regression". I learned, that this is due to a bug in piuparts. > > Any solution on its way

Re: Migration to testing blocked by broken piuparts?

2020-01-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 12:03:43 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Hi, > > two packages[¹, ²] I uploaded are "Rejected due to piuparts > regression". I learned, that this is due to a bug in piuparts. > Any solution on its way? Would I need to re-upload later? > No, it'll eventually get retried a

Re: Migration to testing blocked by broken piuparts?

2020-01-02 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 02.01.2020 um 12:03 schrieb W. Martin Borgert: > Hi, > > two packages[¹, ²] I uploaded are "Rejected due to piuparts > regression". I learned, that this is due to a bug in piuparts. > Any solution on its way? Would I need to re-upload later? > > TIA & Cheers > > PS: Many thanks for running piu

Migration to testing blocked by broken piuparts?

2020-01-02 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Hi, two packages[¹, ²] I uploaded are "Rejected due to piuparts regression". I learned, that this is due to a bug in piuparts. Any solution on its way? Would I need to re-upload later? TIA & Cheers PS: Many thanks for running piuparts anyway. Such bugs happen, but the extra safety net it provide

Re: migration to testing

2010-04-05 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:05:52AM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > As the original poster of that question on debian-mentors, I would > like to ask anyone who has access to a Debian/kFreeBSD installation to > test if fuse-convmvfs from sid works there (provided that fuse4bsd is > installed). My

Re: migration to testing

2010-04-05 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > > > One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot > > > migrate to testing. T

Re: migration to testing

2010-03-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:21:29PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Mike Hommey] > > There is a general problem with fuse, actually. fuse-utils is needed by > > any program using libfuse and allowing users (i.e not root) to mount a > > filesystem: In this case, libfuse uses fusemount to do the m

Re: migration to testing

2010-03-27 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Mike Hommey] > There is a general problem with fuse, actually. fuse-utils is needed by > any program using libfuse and allowing users (i.e not root) to mount a > filesystem: In this case, libfuse uses fusemount to do the mount, since > mount(2) is unfortunately a CAP_SYS_ADMIN syscall, and fusemo

Re: migration to testing

2010-03-27 Thread Mike Hommey
Cc'ing to -devel, as it is a more general problem and I'd like to hear feedback from other fellow developers. On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > > One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a

Re: Mipsel is blocking wordnet migration to testing

2008-01-10 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote a mail > > Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:26:12 +0100 (CET) > From: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Please compile recent version of wordnet > > to fix the problem that was repor

Mipsel is blocking wordnet migration to testing

2008-01-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I wrote a mail Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:26:12 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please compile recent version of wordnet to fix the problem that was reported by the ddpo daemon. This worked for Sparc. Any hint what I could do to tr

Re: gcc stops migration to testing?

2003-09-09 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:55:14PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Artur R. Czechowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have no gcc dependencies neither build-deps. > On i386. > Check e.g. the binaries on arm, one of them (or its dependencies) > probably depends on libgcc1. Thanks for hint. Probabl

Re: gcc stops migration to testing?

2003-09-09 Thread Andreas Metzler
Artur R. Czechowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you enlight me where "Depends: php4-rrdtool gcc-3.3 (not considered)" > comes from on http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/php4-rrdtool.html? > I have no gcc dependencies neither build-deps. On i386. Check e.g. the binaries on arm, one of them (or

gcc stops migration to testing?

2003-09-09 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
Hello, Could you enlight me where "Depends: php4-rrdtool gcc-3.3 (not considered)" comes from on http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/php4-rrdtool.html? I have no gcc dependencies neither build-deps. Cheers Artur -- szybszy niz najwyzszy budynek... inteligentniejszy od kuli w locie...