On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > > > One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot > > > migrate to testing. The migration is blocked by kfreebsd: > > > > > > * fuse-convmvfs/kfreebsd-amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: fuse-utils > > > * fuse-convmvfs/kfreebsd-i386 unsatisfiable Depends: fuse-utils > > > > > > What is the recommended way of solving this? > > > > fuse-utils is not build on kfreebsd-(amd64|i386) since it's > > Linux-specific, see #528537: [snip] > Anyways, on kfreebsd, fusemount is provided by another package (fusebsd, > iirc), which means that except if the freebsd kernel allows the mount > syscall for users, all packages currently depending on fuse-utils should > now depend on fuse-utils | fusebsd.
I could not find this fusebsd package in Debian :( However, a related project indeed exists [1]. As the original poster of that question on debian-mentors, I would like to ask anyone who has access to a Debian/kFreeBSD installation to test if fuse-convmvfs from sid works there (provided that fuse4bsd is installed). My package builds on that architecture just fine, but unfortunately I cannot test myself if it works there. > This just sounds plain wrong, and IMHO, libfuse itself should do the > depend, though arguably, some libfuse rdepends don't need them. Well, if that would be possible I would simply prefer to add a dependence to my package and forget about it for a while. [1] http://fuse4bsd.creo.hu/ -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405210552.ga6...@kaiba.homelan
