On 2012-01-31 18:14, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I'm planning to file bugs against all packages that currently fail the
> piuparts test with a 'ucf: command not found' error in wheezy and sid.
As ucf became transitively essential in the mean time, this mass bug
filing is postponed until this problem
]] Roger Leigh
> > Line 3: "UTC" or "LOCAL". Tells whether the Hardware Clock is set to
> > Coordinated Universal Time or local time. You can always override
> > this value with options on the hwclock command line.
>
> If you saw my mail of a couple of days ago, I have made patches
> for
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:14:49AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Roger Leigh
>
> > Just FYI, please see #659451. I've split the UTC variable into
> > /etc/default/hwclock, which means /etc/default/rcS can become a
> > regular dpkg conffile (in current git only for now). This needs
> > supp
]] Roger Leigh
> Just FYI, please see #659451. I've split the UTC variable into
> /etc/default/hwclock, which means /etc/default/rcS can become a
> regular dpkg conffile (in current git only for now). This needs
> support in d-i clock-setup (done) and util-linux (pending) before
> upload.
I re
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:07:22PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:52:42AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > > Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a few
> > > > days ago, which makes ucf
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:18:08PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:52:42AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > > > Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a
> > >
Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:52:42AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > > Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a
> > > > few
> > > > days ago, which makes ucf quasi-essential.
[...]
> > Well,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:52:42AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a few
> > > days ago, which makes ucf quasi-essential.
>
> > Unless you are going to argue to add it to t
Hi,
On Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a few days
> ago, which makes ucf quasi-essential.
where was this discussed/announced?
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.o
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a few
> > days ago, which makes ucf quasi-essential.
> Unless you are going to argue to add it to the essential set, I can't
> see why that matters. It's still wrong to use
On 01/31/2012 08:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 31.01.2012 18:14, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm planning to file bugs against all packages that currently
>> fail the piuparts test with a 'ucf: command not found' error in
>> wheezy and sid. Currently 22 binary packages from 16 source
>
On 31.01.2012 18:14, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to file bugs against all packages that currently fail the
> piuparts test with a 'ucf: command not found' error in wheezy and sid.
> Currently 22 binary packages from 16 source packages are affected.
>
> Most of these errors happ
Hi,
I'm planning to file bugs against all packages that currently fail the
piuparts test with a 'ucf: command not found' error in wheezy and sid.
Currently 22 binary packages from 16 source packages are affected.
Most of these errors happen during the 'postrm purge' phase because
non-essential pr
13 matches
Mail list logo
