Roger Leigh wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:52:42AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > > > Interesting timing. initscripts started depending on ucf just a > > > > few > > > > days ago, which makes ucf quasi-essential. [...] > > Well, I would argue that packages in the essential set shouldn't be > > adding > > new dependencies without some discussion and review on debian-devel > > first. > > Hopefully we can remove the ucf dependency; please see #648433. > Currently /etc/default/rcS is intentionally only installed once
sysvinit is currently at 9/10 days and about to migrate to testing. If these two controversial changes (initscripts adding dependency on ucf (which becomes transitively-essential), updating rcS on upgrade) should not find their way into testing (in the current form), action should be taken now. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f344620.8010...@abeckmann.de
