Hi,
On Montag, 30. März 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The solution to this and similar problems are always, as pointed out
> by specific solutions in this thread by others, to turn your
> dependency formula into conjunctive normal form (CNF) [1], which is
> always possible, though possibly ugl
* Holger Levsen [2009-03-29 19:46:33 CEST]:
> Hi,
>
> On Sonntag, 29. März 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Hm? Your original mail said you wanted:
> > Depends: (pdns-backend-ldap + pdns-recursor) | bind9
> > How does installing bind9 plus pdns-backend-ldap not satisfy the above?
>
> Sure it d
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:13:52PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> And that bug on policy would have to show more reason than "I do
> not find it pretty enough" to show why we need to modify policy, and
(Note that I did not suggest that, I just pointed out that dpkg
wouldn't have been t
On Mon, Mar 30 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> I'd like to use a depends like "(pdns-backend-ldap pdns-recursor) | bind9"
>> but
>> afaik this is not possible. AFAICS I should file a wishbug against dpkg but
>> as I dont have t
Holger Levsen writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sonntag, 29. März 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Doesn't this do what you want?
>> Depends: pdns-backend-ldap | bind9, pdns-recursor | bind9
>
> sure, that works and thats what I'm doing now. But it's ugly and redudant and
> potentially wrong: installi
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'd like to use a depends like "(pdns-backend-ldap pdns-recursor) | bind9"
> but
> afaik this is not possible. AFAICS I should file a wishbug against dpkg but
> as I dont have time atm to dig through all the bugs against dpkg, I th
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Does dselect still have valid uses cases? Closing all dselect related bugs
> would make going through src:dpkg bugs much easier ;-)
dselect still has users but the dpkg team does not really work on
it. The goal is to make it a separate application (and
Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Sonntag, 29. März 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Hm? Your original mail said you wanted:
> Depends: (pdns-backend-ldap + pdns-recursor) | bind9
> How does installing bind9 plus pdns-backend-ldap not satisfy the above?
Sure it does satisfy the depends, but installin
Hi,
On Sonntag, 29. März 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Hm? Your original mail said you wanted:
> Depends: (pdns-backend-ldap + pdns-recursor) | bind9
> How does installing bind9 plus pdns-backend-ldap not satisfy the above?
Sure it does satisfy the depends, but installing pdns-backup-ldap is n
* Holger Levsen [Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:14:24 +0100]:
> Hi,
Hey,
> On Sonntag, 29. März 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Doesn't this do what you want?
> > Depends: pdns-backend-ldap | bind9, pdns-recursor | bind9
> sure, that works and thats what I'm doing now. But it's ugly and redudant a
Hi,
On Sonntag, 29. März 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Doesn't this do what you want?
> Depends: pdns-backend-ldap | bind9, pdns-recursor | bind9
sure, that works and thats what I'm doing now. But it's ugly and redudant and
potentially wrong: installing pdns-backend-ldap and bind9 satisf
* Marius Vollmer [2009-03-29 15:02]:
> You just need to do the expansion one more time:
>
> (A, B) | (C, D)
> -> A | (C D), B | (C D)
> -> A | C, A | D, B | C, B | D
>
> Every expression involving AND / OR can be written in a 'two-level' form
>
> (A or B or ...) and (X or Y or ..) an
Rafael Laboissiere writes:
> Yes, the formulae are logically equivalent to each other. However, for
> some packages I would like to have (A B) | (C D), meaning ((A and B) or
> (C and D)). This does not seem to be doable with the current Depends
> syntax.
You just need to do the expansion one mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2009-03-29 12:52]:
>
>> Holger Levsen wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to use a depends like "(pdns-backend-ldap pdns-recursor) | bind9"
>>> but
>>> afaik this is not possible. AFAICS I should file a wish
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2009-03-29 12:52]:
> Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> > I'd like to use a depends like "(pdns-backend-ldap pdns-recursor) | bind9"
> > but
> > afaik this is not possible. AFAICS I should file a wishbug against dpkg but
> > as I dont have time atm to dig through all the bugs
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to use a depends like "(pdns-backend-ldap pdns-recursor) | bind9"
> but
> afaik this is not possible. AFAICS I should file a wishbug against dpkg but
> as I dont have time atm to dig through all the bugs against dpkg, I thought I
> drop a mail here, in t
Hi,
I'd like to use a depends like "(pdns-backend-ldap pdns-recursor) | bind9" but
afaik this is not possible. AFAICS I should file a wishbug against dpkg but
as I dont have time atm to dig through all the bugs against dpkg, I thought I
drop a mail here, in the hope that someone will point me t
17 matches
Mail list logo
