* Holger Levsen <hol...@layer-acht.org> [2009-03-29 19:46:33 CEST]: > Hi, > > On Sonntag, 29. März 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > Hm? Your original mail said you wanted: > > Depends: (pdns-backend-ldap + pdns-recursor) | bind9 > > How does installing bind9 plus pdns-backend-ldap not satisfy the above? > > Sure it does satisfy the depends, but installing pdns-backup-ldap is not > needed in that case, thus I consider this buggy.
If you have bind9 installed, pdns-backup-ldap won't even get considered for installation, so there is nothing buggy here. > > Is it relevant whether pdns-backend-ldap is installed or not once bind9 > > has been installed? > > Actually our use-case is to have pdns installed on new installations and > bind9 > not be removed on upgrades... I think that is not possible to have, at all. Unless you explicitly depend on both pdns and bind9, but I take it that you don't want that. :) Maybe reducing bind9 to a Recommends would work from a transitional point of view? So long, Rhonda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
