Awesome :D. I took a look at liquidprompt and the article having just
seen the email I'm responding to. It'll take a little getting used to,
but I'm liking it. I've just been using plain defaults (gnome terminal,
bash/dash) here except one customisation of re-enabling the colour
prompt to better fi
Hello!
ma 8. kesäk. 2020 klo 12.04 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
(art...@debian.org) kirjoitti:
>
> On 5/27/20 9:06 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom
> > prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks,
Sorry for being late to the discussion, but I'd like to share my
dotfiles and setup script that I use for my Debian Testing machines.
https://salsa.debian.org/samueloph/dotfiles
I just updated the README.md to explain the high level of it.
In summary, this is what I use to setup vim, atom, i3, b
Hi!
Thanks for all the tips! I have a long todo of programs to test out now.
One additional source of great Debian Developer wisdom about
command-line terminal app / interpreter / productivity is Jonathan
Carter's Debian Package of the Day YouTube videos:
https://www.youtube.com/wa
On Vi, 12 iun 20, 00:40:40, Phil Morrell wrote:
> On Jo, 04 iun 20, 10:13:06, Michael Shuler wrote:
> > For many years, I have taken a different approach; use the default and add
> > only a few minor changes. Each stable update, I use /etc/skel/.bashrc and
> > edit/add in my little bits.
>
> f
On Jo, 04 iun 20, 10:13:06, Michael Shuler wrote:
> For many years, I have taken a different approach; use the default and add
> only a few minor changes. Each stable update, I use /etc/skel/.bashrc and
> edit/add in my little bits.
for config in ~/.config/bash/*; do source "$config"; done
Th
On 5/27/20 9:06 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom
> prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps using
> zsh
> etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you share some good
>
On Jo, 04 iun 20, 10:13:06, Michael Shuler wrote:
> On 6/3/20 7:30 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Like Paul said in his reply, I also have a "bash monstrosity" as a
> > Bash prompt.
>
> For many years, I have taken a different approach; use the default and add
> only a few minor changes. Each stable u
Hi,
> Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with
> custom prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks,
> perhaps using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can
> you share some good reads (with screenshots) of what you have done?
I'm u
Some notes from our defaults at $DAYJOB. I can't take credit for most of
this. These were ideas I've picked up from various people along the way.
# Prevent users from accidentally overwriting files with redirection.
set -o noclobber
Warning: While I'm the one that added it, sometimes I don't lov
On 6/3/20 7:30 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Like Paul said in his reply, I also have a "bash monstrosity" as a
Bash prompt.
For many years, I have taken a different approach; use the default and
add only a few minor changes. Each stable update, I use
/etc/skel/.bashrc and edit/add in my little bits
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:06:29PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom
> prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps
> using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 07:30:01PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> Like Paul said in his reply, I also have a "bash monstrosity" as a
> Bash prompt. I last spent time tweaking it many years ago, so... This
> migh reflect what my head was like in the past, not today :-]
>
> I am attac
Hi Otto,
On 5/27/20 9:06 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom
> prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps
> using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you share
> some good reads
Hi Otto,
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:06:29PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom
> prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps using
> zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you sh
Hello world,
Like Paul said in his reply, I also have a "bash monstrosity" as a
Bash prompt. I last spent time tweaking it many years ago, so... This
migh reflect what my head was like in the past, not today :-]
I am attaching here the relevant portion of my .bashrc
> Basically the only improvem
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:00 PM Adam Borowski wrote:
> I would like to add at minimum:
> * current git branch (but not -dirty as that can take ages on large repos
> on slow media -- you want changing directory to be instant)
The standard git prompt stuff supports turning each part off individua
On 5/27/20 9:06 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom
> prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps
> using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you share
> some good read
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:06:29PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom
> prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps
> using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you
Le mercredi 27 mai 2020 à 22:06 +0300, Otto Kekäläinen a écrit :
> Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with
> custom prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks,
> perhaps using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences,
> can you share some
Hello!
Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom
prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps
using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you share
some good reads (with screenshots) of what you have done?
I've read
Thank you both for your replies.
I went ahead and pushed a MR:
https://salsa.debian.org/aerostitch/userdir-ldap/merge_requests/1
> Are there discussions about updating welcome email in Debian RT already?
I notified the DSA team on #debian-admin as Mattia was saying in #910057
We'll see the follow
email if it happens.)
> On Oct 3, 2018, at 08:56, James McCoy wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:45:35PM -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote:
>> Yesterday I received my New Debian Developer welcome email (\o/)
>
> Congrats!
>
>> and
>> noticed that it's
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:45:35PM -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> Yesterday I received my New Debian Developer welcome email (\o/)
Congrats!
> and
> noticed that it's still referencing alioth for the hosting of VCS
> repositories.
>
> I couldn't find in which repo
Hi,
Yesterday I received my New Debian Developer welcome email (\o/) and
noticed that it's still referencing alioth for the hosting of VCS
repositories.
I couldn't find in which repo the template for this email was hosted.
Could you point me to the right repo so I can do a MR for t
Hi Gergely [and all],
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:12:58 +0200
Gergely Risko wrote:
> Hey Shlomi,
>
> Yes, sorry about not spending enough time on freecell-solver, totally
> my mistake and I apologize for it.
>
first of all, I am glad to hear that you are OK, and accept your apology.
> Let's hope
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:12:58AM +0200, Gergely Risko wrote:
> Yes, sorry about not spending enough time on freecell-solver, totally
> my mistake and I apologize for it.
>
> Let's hope that I manage to update this package this week. If someone
> wants to be co-maintainer of this package with me
Hey Shlomi,
Yes, sorry about not spending enough time on freecell-solver, totally
my mistake and I apologize for it.
Let's hope that I manage to update this package this week. If someone
wants to be co-maintainer of this package with me, I'm of course more
than happy to accept the help!
Sorry a
Hi all!
Does anyone know the whereabout of Riso Gergely
( https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=ri...@debian.org - CCed to this
message. ) He seems to be missing in action (MIA) since 2014, and he maintains
freecell-solver for which I am the upstream.
Any help would be appreciated.
-
omething I can fix myself.
authorized_keys are supposed to propagate via LDAP. If you have your public
key loaded into LDAP, and you can't get to bruckner, you'll want to contact
debian-admin since AFAICS the host isn't locked down right now.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Monotone has a bug (#404616) that seems to only affect powerpc. I don't
> have access to a powerpc machine myself, so I'd like to use
> bruckner.debian.org to troubleshoot the bug. How do I use the Etch
> chroot on bruckner to install monotone and its de
Op do, 04-01-2007 te 13:51 -0700, schreef Shaun Jackman:
> Monotone has a bug (#404616) that seems to only affect powerpc. I
> don't have access to a powerpc machine myself, so I'd like to use
> bruckner.debian.org to troubleshoot the bug. How do I use the Etch
> chroot on bruckner to install monot
"Shaun Jackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Monotone has a bug (#404616) that seems to only affect powerpc. I
> don't have access to a powerpc machine myself, so I'd like to use
> bruckner.debian.org to troubleshoot the bug. How do I use the Etch
> chroot on bruckner to install monotone and its
chroot on bruckner to install monotone and its dependencies and run
> monotone without root access to bruckner?
Email debian-admin requesting installation of monotone in the chroot.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to
Monotone has a bug (#404616) that seems to only affect powerpc. I
don't have access to a powerpc machine myself, so I'd like to use
bruckner.debian.org to troubleshoot the bug. How do I use the Etch
chroot on bruckner to install monotone and its dependencies and run
monotone without root access to
On Friday, 10 March 2006 15:41, Lars Roland wrote:
> You could subscribe to debian-mentors and start crafting a package.
> Even though Debian has a impressiv amount of packages there are still
> some major ones left (mpich2, pvfs2, trac...).
trac is in
--
Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://
Hi,
> Jump in and start doing something for Debian. Whether that is finding
> fixes for open bugs in our BTS that do not have patches yet, writing
> documentation, translating stuff that needs to be translated, or
> packaging software that needs to be packaged (or help package software
> where the
Hi, Mark...
On Friday 10 March 2006 15:27, Mark Walter wrote:
> I want to step in to be a debian developer.
Great to hear that.
> While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked
> boxes to apply.
>
> Two of them are not true for me at all and I can&#x
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:27:23PM +0100, Mark Walter wrote:
> Hi all,
Hello.
> I want to step in to be a debian developer.
That's rather question for debian-mentors mailing list.
> While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked
> boxes to apply.
On 3/10/06, Mark Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is my question:
>
> Can anybody help to me to satisfy the demand for the two point's as I'am
> interested to be a debian developer ?
Ahh the the cool factor of having a Debian email address (not that i have
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:27:23PM +0100, Mark Walter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to step in to be a debian developer.
>
> While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked
> boxes to apply.
>
> Two of them are not true for me at all and
Hi all,
I want to step in to be a debian developer.
While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked
boxes to apply.
Two of them are not true for me at all and I can't apply as a developer :-(
Here are the two point's:
***
If you intend to package software
Hi,
* Britton Kerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-21 20:38]:
>
> I would like to reactivate my debian developer account.
> Ive been MIA for a while unfortunately, but have now
> rearranged my life so I have time to program for fun
> again.
>
> Is there a standard pr
I would like to reactivate my debian developer account.
Ive been MIA for a while unfortunately, but have now
rearranged my life so I have time to program for fun
again.
Is there a standard procedure for doing this that
someone can point me to?
Thanks,
Britton Kerin
--
Britton Kerin
[EMAIL
* Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-15 07:50]:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:24:44 -0400,
> Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (3) is the email gateway used?
> I tried but failed to change my latitude/longitude data.
> None of the following worked. RTFM instructions welcome.
RTFM
:00.000 N Long: 130:30:00.000 E
---
Lat: 33n45. Long: 130e30.
---
Lat: +0334500 Long: +1303000
---
The error message was:
==> Message Error: Positions were found, but they are not correctly formed
Command is not understood. Halted
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian develop
Hi,
Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> (2) do people really update their records? (For example, what
> percentage of entries were updated last year? What percentage of
> entries have not been updated at all for two years? three years?)
Well, personal information is not that often updated when it does
Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've volunteered to help build a database of KDE advocates and am
> starting the design. A previous kde-promo thread mentioned the
> Debian LDAP gateway as a possible model to follow.
> I would be interested in any feedback the Debian developers hav
I've volunteered to help build a database of KDE advocates and am
starting the design. A previous kde-promo thread mentioned the
Debian LDAP gateway as a possible model to follow.
I would be interested in any feedback the Debian developers have on
this system. It seems to have a lot of nice f
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 2:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my
> packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of
> my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreciate it
Hi!
This tool is great and very useful.
However, there is a little bug with some kind of mangling of the version
numbers:
on "http://qa.debian.org/developer/index.php?package=loadwatch";,
loadwatch appears to have 2 different versions in testing and unstable
(1.0_1.1alpha1-1 and 1.0+1.1alpha1-1),
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 17:20]:
> > http://qa.debian.org/developer/
>
> If you want to have it hosted there, you should really
> a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards
>for web pages (i.e. hav
* Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 17:20]:
> http://qa.debian.org/developer/
If you want to have it hosted there, you should really
a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards
for web pages (i.e. have wml files in qa/wml which are build
and then copied t
Am 28.08.02 um 17:20:44 schrieb Igor Genibel:
> I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There was a bug,
> fixed for now.
Ah, great! I really don't have anything to complain about now.[1]
Bye,
Mike
[1] Where I come from, "I can't complain" is equivalent to
"I think it's bril
I see an issue with the link to bugs,non-fixed. The web page
adds the url tag "raw=yes". I'm not certain of the function of that
url tag. But, with it in, the bugs page shows all of the active bugs
instead of excluding bugs that marked fixed or done.
Is this a bug in the bugs.d.o/cgi-bin/packager
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:52:49AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does
> > "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many
> > "Packages version in red" either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU.
>
> It's talking about the color o
Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am 27.08.02 um 13:38:36 schrieb Joey Hess:
> > - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU.
>
> I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does
> "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many
> "Packages version in red" either, e
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:31:51PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Because packages are not required to have an "Uploaders" field. I'm
> afraid I don't quite understand your algorithm. For which package will
> there ever be a red markup?
I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There wa
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:17:13PM +0100, Thom May écrivait:
> > I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would work quite
> > nicely :-)
> >
> uh. E
> (developer.debian.org, maybe)
The new official name is http://qa.debian.org/developer/
Cheer
Am 28.08.02 um 16:03:28 schrieb Igor Genibel:
> > For instance 10a-1.1 for package kimwitu-doc. Or 3.37-3.1 for file.
> I don't know why there is no Uploader field for those packages.
Because packages are not required to have an "Uploaders" field. I'm
afraid I don't quite understand your algorith
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
Hi,
> Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> > Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf
> > the Uplpoaders field in the control file).
>
> Alright, but the description "uploaded by develope
Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf
> the Uplpoaders field in the control file).
Alright, but the description "uploaded by developer" is a little
misleading.
> I guess it detects the NMU with a regexp in the ve
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
>> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
>> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
>> Now you, developers, can tra
* Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if
> > he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides
> > everything that you need ?
>
> I'm s
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if
> he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides
> everything that you need ?
I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would wor
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
Hi,
> Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my
> packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of
> my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreci
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
> > Now you, developers, c
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:25:42AM +0200, Michael Piefel écrivait:
> I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does
> "Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many
Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf
the Uplpoaders field in the
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:57:14AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like
> > 'build.php?&pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :)
>
> On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the
> redirect and follo
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:53:11AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Igor,
Hi,
> > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> > following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
>
> The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit but
Hello,
I found another bug. In the list of available packages the source
libsigc++-1.1 is visibile/accessible but libsigc++ does not seem to exist.
Michael
* Igor Genibel
| I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
| following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
| Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
| packages such as:
| - the pts related page about packages (Thank
Am 27.08.02 um 13:38:36 schrieb Joey Hess:
> - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU.
I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does
"Packages in blue" refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many
"Packages version in red" either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU.
>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel:
> > - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...);
>
> Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For
> instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=n
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like
> 'build.php?&pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :)
On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the
redirect and follow the spec
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
> Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
> packages such as:
>
Igor Genibel wrote:
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
This is very nice. A few comments:
- It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU.
- On a 1280 pixel wide display, I can only s
Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel:
> - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...);
Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For
instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=nick you
can see there is 1 bug for the file package. But in fact there's d
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:18:58PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> > Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in turn seems to provoke the bug
> > Daniel Burrows mentioned, so there's probably some additional regexp
> > metacharacter escaping needed somewhere.
>
> Yes, very similar problem for kimwi
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
Hi,
> I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
> stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package.
> According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists.
It is now fixed. As Colin s
Am 27.08.02 um 15:03:31 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
> > stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package.
> > According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists.
> Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in t
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:10:26PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any logs with
> build failure in the buildd link,
> but it probably needs more work on the buildd page side?
Last year (!) I write a patch for the buildd log page and s
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Igor Genibel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
> Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
> packages such as:
> - the
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:08:44AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this?
Surely not ! ;)
> Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9
> in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349
>
> Warning: Compilation failed: noth
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
> Igor Genibel writes:
> > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
>
> I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
> stable and testing, but there is no such version of that
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:11:40PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I
> wasn't watching. Thanks!
Thanks a lot to.
> I notice one slight glitch; following a PTS link to a lib* package takes
> you to e.g. http://pts.debian.net/l/libfilte
Hi Igor,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit buttons
for each of
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
> > Igor Genibel writes:
> > > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> > I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having versio
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
> Igor Genibel writes:
> > I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a
Igor Genibel writes:
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package.
According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists.
Other
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I
wasn't watching. Thanks!
I
Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this?
Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9
in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349
Warning: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9
in /home/igenibel/public_html/html.php on line 349
...
Loo
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:24:57 +0200
Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...);
> - the broken dependencies for each branch (stable, testing, unstable).
This is simply, great. Good work!
It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any l
Hi Igor,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
>
> I waiting for you comments, advices, insults or other things.
Many thanks for you
Hi all,
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
packages such as:
- the pts related page about packages (Thanks a lot to Raphaël
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> No, not yet. But as it must integrate in what we already have ... WML has
> support for eperl. But I have decided of absolutely nothing and it's
> possible that I end without eperl and without php with a simple perl
> script (I don't know python but m
Le Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:58:15PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz écrivait:
> that's exactly the name i was going to suggest. has the author decided on a
> language to tame this beast in? if php, i'd love to help.
No, not yet. But as it must integrate in what we already have ... WML has
support for eperl. But
Jordi Mallach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Haha! Pleaase let's call it my.debian.org, *grin*.
> Now, something like this would be really useful.
that's exactly the name i was going to suggest. has the author decided on a
language to tame this beast in? if php, i'd love to help.
--
(jacob kuntz)
Le Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:51:19AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer écrivait:
> Hmm, /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg lists 278 identities,
> while the Maintainer fields in my available file lists 543 separate
> values.
$ gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.pgp
--li
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 10:40:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Hey people ! I posted this mail in order to have some input ... it would
> > be great if some of you gave their opinion about this proposition I posted
> > a while ago :
>
> I guess the silent majority overwhelmingly agrees to your p
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
