Hi Florian,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 07:34:49PM +0200, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mario Holbe:
>
> > We did. 0.5.4-6sarge1 was on s.d.o as soon as possible. Since there were
> > no newer version in unstable, the version on s.d.o should have had
> > automatically override even
* Mario Holbe:
> We did. 0.5.4-6sarge1 was on s.d.o as soon as possible. Since there were
> no newer version in unstable, the version on s.d.o should have had
> automatically override even the unstable version. Of course, if you
> don't source in s.d.o, you don't get security updates :)
In this c
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 08:07:28AM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I understand it, there is no good reason to have s.d.o in
> > my sources list, as the packages in there are for sarge, and may not be
> > compatible with the current sid ABI.
>
>
Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I understand it, there is no good reason to have s.d.o in
> my sources list, as the packages in there are for sarge, and may not be
> compatible with the current sid ABI.
This is nonsense. If this should really be the way you understand it,
please ask your
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 10:45:27PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 13:18 -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > Who told you that the sarge fix would propagate?
> >
> > Packages don't *propagate* from stable. If you want a package that
> > was uploaded to stable to go to unst
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:18:11PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> >> This is a sponsored uploaded package that only had 1 upload, and
> >had a
> >> DSA[3] issued which is still not fixed outside of sarge.
> >We made that DSA happen.
> >And we were told more than once, that the sarge fix
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 13:18 -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Who told you that the sarge fix would propagate?
>
> Packages don't *propagate* from stable. If you want a package that
> was uploaded to stable to go to unstable, an upload is needed. You
> should have asked for a sponsor.
Well, a
"Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:18:11PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
In cases where a security bug is being fixed, you usually try to
upload the package as soon as possible. If your sponsor is on
We did
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:18:11PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> In cases where a security bug is being fixed, you usually try to
> upload the package as soon as possible. If your sponsor is on
We did. 0.5.4-6sarge1 was on s.d.o as soon as possible. Since there were
no newer version in unst
On 6/20/06, Elrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:02:50PM -0300, Damián Viano wrote:
> I've seen cgiirc[1] in a bad state for some time now, I tried to contact
> the maintainer (Mario Holbe) more than a month ago, offering my help and
> my work[2]. No answer so far.
M
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:02:50PM -0300, Damián Viano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen cgiirc[1] in a bad state for some time now, I tried to contact
> the maintainer (Mario Holbe) more than a month ago, offering my help and
> my work[2]. No answer so far.
Mario and I were busy. And I was tryin
Hi,
I've seen cgiirc[1] in a bad state for some time now, I tried to contact
the maintainer (Mario Holbe) more than a month ago, offering my help and
my work[2]. No answer so far.
This is a sponsored uploaded package that only had 1 upload, and had a
DSA[3] issued which is still
12 matches
Mail list logo
