Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I understand it, there is no good reason to have s.d.o in > my sources list, as the packages in there are for sarge, and may not be > compatible with the current sid ABI.
This is nonsense. If this should really be the way you understand it, please ask yourself why a package's version on s.d.o which overrides a version in unstable (i.e. the version on s.d.o is bigger than the version in unstable) should ever have a less compatible ABI than the (smaller) version in unstable. regards Mario -- It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts. -- Sherlock Holmes by Arthur Conan Doyle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
