Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I guess you're aware of the thread started with [1]. Clint seemed to
> have some sort of plans back then.
>
> 1. <4714ddb6.8020...@debian.org>
Yeah, that was 1.5 years ago and as it looks, the situation has not really
improved since then.
Michael
--
Why is it that al
(Not sure if you need to To+Cc d...@…)
Michael Biebl (09/04/2009):
> Sorry for hijacking the thread, but what are the plans for bdb in
> squeeze, I'm counting 5 atm:
> libdb4.2
> libdb4.4
> libdb4.5
> libdb4.6
> libdb4.7
>
> Are there plans to reduce this?
I guess you're aware of the thread sta
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 01:04:38AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Sorry for hijacking the thread, but what are the plans for bdb in squeeze, I'm
> counting 5 atm:
> libdb4.2
> libdb4.4
> libdb4.5
> libdb4.6
> libdb4.7
> Are there plans to reduce this?
I believe the reverse-deps of db4.2 have all h
Steffen Joeris wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:10:12 pm Romain Beauxis wrote:
>> Le Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:59:00 Sebastien Delafond, vous avez écrit :
>>> On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
important for jruby...
>>> to have
4 matches
Mail list logo
