Hi,
Quoting Iustin Pop (2016-05-28 00:53:18)
> If we go that way, they we should make it abstract: introduce Vcs-Path
> and Vcs-Layout. Both of these are completely independent of the software
> that hosts the code.
this would also make it possible to have spaces in the path name without having
t
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.06.2016, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > I never really understood why there is a games team; assuming that
> > technically, almost every game is an island. (Ok, legal issues might be
> > similar).
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> I never really understood why there is a games team; assuming that
> technically, almost every game is an island. (Ok, legal issues might be
> similar). This is a very different situation than programming library
> packaging.
>
>
Quoting Joachim Breitner (2016-06-24 16:02:57)
> I never really understood why there is a games team; assuming that
> technically, almost every game is an island. (Ok, legal issues might
> be similar). This is a very different situation than programming
> library packaging.
Because not all team
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.06.2016, 09:17 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > The Debian Haskell team has migrated a while back from per-package
> > repositories to a single repository which contains the packaging (only
> > debian/) for the
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> The Debian Haskell team has migrated a while back from per-package
> repositories to a single repository which contains the packaging (only
> debian/) for the vast majority of packages
> (https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-haskell/DHG_p
Quoting Lars Wirzenius (2016-05-26 08:08:35)
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:09:47PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> By also considering the fact that the "-d DIR" solution does not
>> prevent to add a "-l" in the future, I think minimality wins here
>> (hence my "Yay" to your proposal in separa
On 2016-05-27 18:56:21, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
> Iustin,
>
> On 27 May 2016 at 18:34, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > That is a good point indeed. I'll think about it, but unless I find a
> > much nicer solution I'll go ahead with the current one.
> >
> > At the moment I'm waiting to have some free time to lo
Iustin,
On 27 May 2016 at 18:34, Iustin Pop wrote:
> That is a good point indeed. I'll think about it, but unless I find a
> much nicer solution I'll go ahead with the current one.
>
> At the moment I'm waiting to have some free time to look at the vcswatch
> and debcheckout code to see how diffi
On 2016-05-27 03:01:29, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 25 May 2016 at 17:09, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > I'm convinced we will need at some point to document VCS packaging
> > layouts in a way that allow tools to use that information
> > programmatically. But right now that informatio
Hi Stefano,
On 25 May 2016 at 17:09, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm convinced we will need at some point to document VCS packaging
> layouts in a way that allow tools to use that information
> programmatically. But right now that information will not be actionable,
> whereas the subdirectory alr
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:09:47PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> By also considering the fact that the "-d DIR" solution does not prevent
> to add a "-l" in the future, I think minimality wins here (hence my
> "Yay" to your proposal in separate mail). YMMV.
My only concern here is the introdu
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 09:19:34PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> And regarding layout: vcswatch already has code to try both
> `/debian/changelog' and `/changelog' and use either of them. Having an
> explicit layout (-l standard vs. -l native) would make this more
> explicit rather than relying on heu
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 09:25:41PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> Since option 1) is restrictive (doesn't allow expansion), and option 2)
> with "-x foo" is along what we already have, I propose that for now:
>
> - we add "-d path/to/project" (debcheckout, vcswatch, policy, etc.)
> - document that the
On 2016-05-25 09:25:08, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 25.05.2016, 08:25 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
> > I just wonder whether we should also take the chance of improving the
> > spec in a way that will allow, down the line, to automatically find the
> > actual packaging
On 2016-05-25 09:34:43, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> My vote goes for changing nothing. IMO the extra convenience does not
> outweigh the costs of having to support all the specific layouts in all
> our infrastructure that wants to interact with the packaging git
> repositories.
I'm not sure this is s
On 2016-05-25 18:00:55, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 25.05.2016, 09:34 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> > I fear that adding such expressivity is encouraging bad practice. While
> > I can understand that a single repository can be convenient and easier
> > to manage than prop
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 25.05.2016, 09:34 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> I fear that adding such expressivity is encouraging bad practice. While
> I can understand that a single repository can be convenient and easier
> to manage than proper "mr" usage, it also feels wrong on many levels:
> - you d
Hi,
On Wed, 25 May 2016, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > A potential syntax for the Vcs-* fields would be:
> >
> > Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-haskell/DHG_packages.git/ p/ghc
>
> I think something like this, or with the
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 25.05.2016, 08:25 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
> I just wonder whether we should also take the chance of improving the
> spec in a way that will allow, down the line, to automatically find the
> actual packaging code also in other, more complex situations. Specifying
> a
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 08:25:09AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > A potential syntax for the Vcs-* fields would be:
> >
> > Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-haskell/DHG_packages.git/ p/ghc
>
> I think something like th
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> A potential syntax for the Vcs-* fields would be:
>
> Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-haskell/DHG_packages.git/ p/ghc
I think something like this, or with the equivalent expressivity, would
be useful and welcome, yes.
I ju
Hi all,
The Debian Haskell team has migrated a while back from per-package
repositories to a single repository which contains the packaging (only
debian/) for the vast majority of packages
(https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-haskell/DHG_packages.git/). This
makes sense for us since the packaging
23 matches
Mail list logo
