> If we call it something like a 'developer' release, or an 'early-access'
> release, then it sounds like a great idea, yes... as long as people don't
> get the impression that it is a full 2.1 release.
Ok, under this impression powerpc is ready to go.
I'll upload 2.1 kernel source and images
Paul Slootman wrote:
>
> The last time I tried (about 10 sec. ago, on a.d.nl :-):
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `/extra/home/debian/psl/kernel/linux/drivers/net'
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/extra/home/debian/psl/kernel/linux/include -Wall
> -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strength-
On Thu 15 Oct 1998, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > There is one, MAJOR, huge, massive, 'program' which egcs will not
> > properly compile, this is the kernel, 2.0.x is officially not going to
> > operate 100% correctly when compiled with gcc 2.8.
On Thu 15 Oct 1998, J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 01:50:33PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > I last compiled (with success) 2.0.36pre2 with "gcc version egcs-2.90.29
> > 980515 (egcs 1.0.3 release)" (according to /proc/version). That works
> > perfectly with ISDN and all, and
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 11:49:59PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> --On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 12:14 am +0200 "Christian Meder"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:05:25AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >> > "Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> Bri
--On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 1:12 pm +0200 "Christian Meder"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > * if there's a stabilized snapshot newbies will get (hopefully) a
>> > softer introduction in the wonders of the Linux-Sparc/Powerpc/Arm/...
>> world
>>
>>
>> I see your argument. I'm worried that we might be
> > > Oh, i can generate a kernel-image_2.1.125-1_powerpc.deb along with source
> > > and dsc files and upload it to master, but will you and the other arch
> > > maintainer agree with this??
> >
> > If it's a powerpc package only, I don't see why there would be a problem.
> > It should get install
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 01:50:33PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> I last compiled (with success) 2.0.36pre2 with "gcc version egcs-2.90.29
> 980515 (egcs 1.0.3 release)" (according to /proc/version). That works
> perfectly with ISDN and all, and stayed up for a month until I upgraded
> sysvinit whi
On Wed 14 Oct 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:04:29PM -0400, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
> >
> > slink/i386. A caveat, however, is that we need to resolve some big egcs
> > issues SOON or else we can't release (as is, 1.1b will not compile two or
> > three vital pack
> > So far, Alpha is looking "near" ready and we are shooting to release with
> > slink/i386. A caveat, however, is that we need to resolve some big egcs
> > issues SOON or else we can't release (as is, 1.1b will not compile two or
> > three vital packages correctly).
>
> There is one, MAJOR, hug
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There is one, MAJOR, huge, massive, 'program' which egcs will not
> properly compile, this is the kernel, 2.0.x is officially not going to
> operate 100% correctly when compiled with gcc 2.8.x or egcs..
>
> Any suggestions?
On the Alpha? I've had
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:04:29PM -0400, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
>
> > Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> > in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
>
> So far, Alpha is looking "near" ready and we are shoo
> > Brian> Could I get some official word on which architectures wish
> > Brian> to be included in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
> >
> > I don't think sparc is ready to go, though Johnnie or Eric may see it
> > differently.
> >
> I'm neither Johnnie nor Eric but I think the basic to
--On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 12:14 am +0200 "Christian Meder"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:05:25AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
>> > "Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Brian> Could I get some official word on which architectures wish
>> Bria
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:05:25AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Brian> Could I get some official word on which architectures wish
> Brian> to be included in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
>
> I don't think sparc is ready
> > Oh, i can generate a kernel-image_2.1.125-1_powerpc.deb along with source
> > and dsc files and upload it to master, but will you and the other arch
> > maintainer agree with this??
>
> If it's a powerpc package only, I don't see why there would be a problem.
> It should get installed automati
Please wait about 2 days. Geert and Paul have finished the last of their
commits and I'm putting in a few small changes today and tomorrow.
}Yes, last rumors say that linux-2.2 came out short before christmas.
}
}Oh, i can generate a kernel-image_2.1.125-1_powerpc.deb along with source
}and dsc f
> > > We need a 2.1.x kernel source package, which isn't available for debian.
> >
> > I don't see why you couldn't create one just for the powerpc arch. Either
> > way, v2.2 of the kernel should be available before v2.2 of Debian.
>
> Yes, last rumors say that linux-2.2 came out short before chr
> > We need a 2.1.x kernel source package, which isn't available for debian.
>
> I don't see why you couldn't create one just for the powerpc arch. Either
> way, v2.2 of the kernel should be available before v2.2 of Debian.
Yes, last rumors say that linux-2.2 came out short before christmas.
Oh
> > > Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> > > in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
> >
> > PowerPC has more or less given up on making 2.1. We're moving well,
> > but I'm of the inclination we shouldn't release until we have a truly
> > stabilized libc - o
> > Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> > in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
> >
> PowerPC has more or less given up on making 2.1. We're moving well,
> but I'm of the inclination we shouldn't release until we have a truly
> stabilized libc - or at leas
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
> Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
hurd-i386 is certainly "not ready".
BTW: Considering the great amount of Cc:s in the original post, I have
decided to trim a little bit the
> "Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> Could I get some official word on which architectures wish
Brian> to be included in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
I don't think sparc is ready to go, though Johnnie or Eric may see it
differently.
Ultrasparc definately
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
ARM is nowhere near being release ready (we just started).
Cheers,
- Jim
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
> Probably 4-6 weeks. I'd like to ship it before the end of November.
Fantastic!
> Guy, is there any problem with freezing the alpha architecture some time
> after the main freeze?
About the only thing I'm really concerned with is egcs. As much as I ha
> > Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> > in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
>
> So far, Alpha is looking "near" ready and we are shooting to release with
> slink/i386. A caveat, however, is that we need to resolve some big egcs
> issues SOON or else we
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
> Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
So far, Alpha is looking "near" ready and we are shooting to release with
slink/i386. A caveat, however, is that we need to resolve some b
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:15:51AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
> in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
>
> Brian
> ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
PowerPC ha
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
---
29 matches
Mail list logo
