Re: Removal of LaTeX2HTML from main

2003-11-12 Thread Isaac Clerencia
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:56:44AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote: > > Read the latest DWN > > You mean the DWN from yesterday which has not already been translated? > Ok, thanks. > > In case someone else is wondering, the explanation is finally there: >

Re: Removal of LaTeX2HTML from main

2003-11-12 Thread Mathieu Roy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Isaac Clerencia) a tapoté : > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:15:19AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote: >> Can someone provide a link to a clear explanation about latex2html >> being non-free? > > Read the latest DWN You mean the DWN from yesterday which has not already been translated? Ok

Re: Removal of LaTeX2HTML from main

2003-11-12 Thread Isaac Clerencia
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:15:19AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote: > Can someone provide a link to a clear explanation about latex2html > being non-free? Read the latest DWN

Re: Removal of LaTeX2HTML from main

2003-11-12 Thread Mathieu Roy
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 04:06:02PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: > >> working on the legal issues for LaTeX2HTML [1], at debian-legal [2], we >> concluded that LaTeX2HTML will have to be removed from main because it > [...] >> With /usr/bin/latex2html

Re: Removal of LaTeX2HTML from main

2003-11-11 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 04:06:02PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: > working on the legal issues for LaTeX2HTML [1], at debian-legal [2], we > concluded that LaTeX2HTML will have to be removed from main because it [...] > With /usr/bin/latex2html substituted, many packages render bad results > or ev

Re: Removal of LaTeX2HTML from main

2003-11-10 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi, some additional info: On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 16:54, Adrian Bunk wrote to #204684: > after reading through #204684, I'd suggest a different approach for > latex2html: > - move latex2html to non-free without renaming it > - file RC bugs against packages in main build depending on latex2html >

Re: Removal of LaTeX2HTML from main

2003-11-10 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 04:06:02PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: > Hi, > > working on the legal issues for LaTeX2HTML [1], at debian-legal [2], we > concluded that LaTeX2HTML will have to be removed from main because it > is considered non-free in the sense of the DFSG. After dozens of emails > with

Removal of LaTeX2HTML from main

2003-11-10 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi, working on the legal issues for LaTeX2HTML [1], at debian-legal [2], we concluded that LaTeX2HTML will have to be removed from main because it is considered non-free in the sense of the DFSG. After dozens of emails with upstream and a thread [3] on the LaTeX2HTML mailing list, the upstream mai