Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 04:06:02PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: > >> working on the legal issues for LaTeX2HTML [1], at debian-legal [2], we >> concluded that LaTeX2HTML will have to be removed from main because it > [...] >> With /usr/bin/latex2html substituted, many packages render bad results >> or even FTBFS because of several reasons: > [...] >> As the maintainer of one of the aforementioned packages you have the >> choice between the following options (exclusively): > [...] >> * Build-Depend on hevea or hyperlatex if you figure out that one of >> these alternatives are better than TeX4ht (htlatex) > > Please consider using hevea as a replacement of latex2html. It is > currently used (by the respective upstream authors) to produce > html versions of the manual of OCaml and GNU Prolog. > > I don't know what the special features of latex2html are, but > if you tell me what special needs you have I can try to check > if it can be done with hevea.
Can someone provide a link to a clear explanation about latex2html being non-free? -- Mathieu Roy +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ | | Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ | | Not a native english speaker: | | http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
