So Joey and Manoj are having a `friendly' discussing about the best way to
implement an installer package for realplayer, I wondered how the other
distributions do it.
Now I have not bothered to look because I am to lazy, but my best guess is
that RedHat includes a copy of the Realplayer
I checked and REALPLAYER_HOME was set to the G2 directory (from an old
manual installation). I changed it to /usr/lib/RealPlayer7 and
realplayer started working. Then I deleted REALPLAYER_HOME
environmental variable altogether and it still worked. This would
indicate that it isn't required
make sure the REALPLAYER_HOME environment
>> variable is set correctly.
>
> Nor can I reproduce this.
I've played around with my system some more. Here's what I tried:
1. Removed libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 - realplayer kept working
2. Changed REALPLAYER_HOME - realpla
David Webb wrote:
> I had the same problem. Installing libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 fixed it on my
> system.
I cannot reproduce this. Works fine for me without that library installed.
> You also have to make sure the REALPLAYER_HOME environment
> variable is set correctly.
Nor can I reproduce this.
--
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 01:26:17PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> I tried the woody installer on a potato system. It installed
> realplayer, but it doesn't seem to work. No messages or core
> dump--nothing happens. I also tried installing the tarball and
> installing the .deb c
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 07:09:31PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > I agree with Branden: remove the installer from potato.
>
> The problem that I forgot to mention is that anyone who upgrades from slink
> to potato w/o upgrading realplayer, and had realplayer
anyone who upgrades from slink
> > to potato w/o upgrading realplayer, and had realplayer installed via the
> > installer in slink, is going to find that the old realplayer they have
> > installed realplayer no longer works. Library incompatabilities of some
> > kind cause i
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 07:09:31PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > I agree with Branden: remove the installer from potato.
>
> The problem that I forgot to mention is that anyone who upgrades from slink
> to potato w/o upgrading realplayer, and had realplayer
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I agree with Branden: remove the installer from potato.
The problem that I forgot to mention is that anyone who upgrades from slink
to potato w/o upgrading realplayer, and had realplayer installed via the
installer in slink, is going to find that the old realplayer t
Calm down man. The men in the white coats will be here soon.
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 05:47:41PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > The realplayer installer package in potato is broken and useless because
> > Real has, in their infinite wisdom, removed
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 05:47:41PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> The realplayer installer package in potato is broken and useless because
> Real has, in their infinite wisdom, removed version 6.x of the program from
> their download sites now that they have a beta of 7.0. (Bug #60323.)
&g
The realplayer installer package in potato is broken and useless because
Real has, in their infinite wisdom, removed version 6.x of the program from
their download sites now that they have a beta of 7.0. (Bug #60323.)
So the installer can't install anything. The package either needs to be
p
I'm tired of dealing with this installer package.
--
see shy jo
13 matches
Mail list logo
