On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 12:19 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[...]
> Isn't that a non-issue (for now)?
>
> Here's my reasoning:
>
> 1) The non-free deb is only in apt if non-free is in sources.list.
> 2) AN earlier mail stated that the kernel recommends the non-free firmware
> deb.
[...]
Of c
[Goswin von Brederlow]
> Isn't that a non-issue (for now)?
>
> Here's my reasoning:
>
> 1) The non-free deb is only in apt if non-free is in sources.list.
> 2) AN earlier mail stated that the kernel recommends the non-free
>firmware deb.
> 3) Recommends are to be installed by default.
>
> Shoul
Petter Reinholdtsen writes:
> [Ben Hutchings]
>> I think the plan was that any firmware package that is available
>> during installation and that satisfies a firmware request will get
>> installed. However, I have not worked on this and I don't know what
>> has actually been implemented.
>
> At
>> So we should push the "removals from testing / additions to testing" mails
>> to -devel instead of -testing-changes? Now that we're in freeze?
> probably an extra section in the DPN during freezes would be quite useful
> indeed, cc:ing -publicity for input. Something for wheezy though :)
> S
Am Sonntag, 9. Januar 2011, 15:35:35 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> So, removals needs to be done, but they also need to be communicated _well_
> (else where then on -testing-changes, thats a dump, not communication).
In addition to what you said, packages.d.o should not "forget" about removed
packages
Hi,
On Freitag, 7. Januar 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> So we should push the "removals from testing / additions to testing" mails
> to -devel instead of -testing-changes? Now that we're in freeze?
probably an extra section in the DPN during freezes would be quite useful
indeed, cc:ing -publicity
[Ben Hutchings]
> I think the plan was that any firmware package that is available
> during installation and that satisfies a firmware request will get
> installed. However, I have not worked on this and I don't know what
> has actually been implemented.
At the moment hw-detect as part of d-i wi
Very glad to hear this!
Adnan
Sent using Android (xperia x10)
On Jan 7, 2011 12:57 PM, "Holger Levsen" wrote:
Hi,
squeeze will have googleearth-package, it was unblocked yesterday.
cheers,
Holger
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 05:58:26PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-01-07, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> > This means that firmware-linux-nonfree is unlikely to be installed if not
> > needed. If you were to add in some of the other firmware packages
> > (-atheros, -bnx2, -iwlwifi, -ralink, -r
On 2011-01-07, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
>> And yes, this mail is mocking this whole story. And no, you shouldn't
>> go whining about your pet package on -devel to get it included.
> What I don't understand is your tone by which you're conveying this message.
>
> If it wasn't for those "pet packages" a
On 2011-01-07, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 04:38:57PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> On 2011-01-07, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> > squeeze will have googleearth-package, it was unblocked yesterday.
>> It won't have a googleearth package, though.
>> And it will have literally about 17
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 04:38:57PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-01-07, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > squeeze will have googleearth-package, it was unblocked yesterday.
>
> It won't have a googleearth package, though.
>
> And it will have literally about 17200 packages in main on i386. And
>
> And yes, this mail is mocking this whole story. And no, you shouldn't
> go whining about your pet package on -devel to get it included.
What I don't understand is your tone by which you're conveying this message.
If it wasn't for those "pet packages" as you call them, Debian
wouldn't be what i
On 2011-01-07, Holger Levsen wrote:
> squeeze will have googleearth-package, it was unblocked yesterday.
It won't have a googleearth package, though.
And it will have literally about 17200 packages in main on i386. And
about 15580 source packages. They come with a free license, too. And
have
14 matches
Mail list logo
