On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 12:19 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: [...] > Isn't that a non-issue (for now)? > > Here's my reasoning: > > 1) The non-free deb is only in apt if non-free is in sources.list. > 2) AN earlier mail stated that the kernel recommends the non-free firmware > deb. [...]
Of course it doesn't, because that would violate policy. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
