On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the
> > results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read
> > http://io.debian.net/ssh.html . If web access is enough
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the
> results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read
> http://io.debian.net/ssh.html . If web access is enough, go to
> http://io.debian.net/~lucas/bdfh-20080202/
t
On 05/02/08 at 23:32 +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080205 21:57]:
> > I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the
> > results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read
> > http://io.debian.net/ssh.html .
On 05/02/08 at 23:43 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:57:16PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 25/01/08 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the
> > results are available on io.debian.net. If you wan
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:57:16PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 25/01/08 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the
> results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read
> http://io.debian.net/ssh.html . If web
On 05/02/2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Why that? Both, the diff.gz and the .dsc, are part of the source
> package, so why did they change at all?
See the build log:
,
| gpg: Signature made Tue Jan 29 21:33:22 2008 CET using DSA key ID 00D8CD16
| gpg: Can't check signature: public key not f
Hi!
* Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080205 21:57]:
> I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the
> results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read
> http://io.debian.net/ssh.html . If web access is enough, go to
> http://io.debian.net/~lucas/bdf
On 05/02/2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal,
\o/
> debcmp is an home-made script I use to compare packages, looking
> more deeply than what debdiff does. It's available from
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-qa/tools/debcmp/ , if you wan
On 25/01/08 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386.
> - one in a perfectly clean chroot, as I usually do
> - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were
> installed (take the Sources file, extract the build-deps for all
>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:20:47AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 26/01/08 at 08:59 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not really sure of what we should do about those problems. The
> > > easiest way to fix them is to use
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:20:47AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 26/01/08 at 08:59 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not really sure of what we should do about those problems. The
> > > easiest way to fix them is to use
On 28/01/2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Build-Conflicts: libwxgtk2.6-dev?
I thought we were moving away from wx 2.4, not from 2.6. ;-)
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpLO4s4mwjfE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:23:09AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 27/01/08 at 12:47 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > trustedqsl build-depends(*) on libwxgtk2.4-dev, but your bdfh had
> > libwxgtk2.6-dev installed as well. The bdfh build used the newer
> > version, hence the binary dependencies w
On 26/01/08 at 08:59 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > I'm not really sure of what we should do about those problems. The
> > easiest way to fix them is to use source-only uploads (to avoid packages
> > built on broken maintainer mach
On 27/01/08 at 12:47 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> trustedqsl build-depends(*) on libwxgtk2.4-dev, but your bdfh had
> libwxgtk2.6-dev installed as well. The bdfh build used the newer
> version, hence the binary dependencies were different. I'm not really
> sure how to solve this. The two libwxgtk
On 25/01/2008, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386.
[...]
> - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were
> installed (take the Sources file, extract the build-deps for all
> packages, and install as many packages as possib
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> 938 packages produced different binary packages according to debdiff. Of
> those, 477 produced different Depends line (caused by some features not
> being explicitely enabled, but not being explicitely disabled, usually).
>
> All th
Thanks for your efforts.
- hal has been fixed in the pkg-utopia svn.
- libnl-doc (different size) seems to be an issue of doxygen embedding
the date of generation in the resulting html pages. I don't consider
that a problem.
- The fix for dbus is in the works. It's apparently the usage of the
w
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I'm not really sure of what we should do about those problems. The
> easiest way to fix them is to use source-only uploads (to avoid packages
> built on broken maintainer machines), and a better sbuild that can use
> lvm snapshots s
On 25/01/08 at 13:46 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Would it be possible to get access to the binaries? I'm interested in
> choose-mirror, localechooser, ikiwiki, libperl-critic-perl, and
> fbreader, which differed only in package size between the two builds.
The host I stored them on isn't web-accessi
On 25/01/08 at 18:10 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 16:37 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > On 25/01/08 at 15:59 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
> [docbok-xsl-doc-html]
> > But if the size is the same, why would the Installed-Size differ? I have
> > no idea. I've copied
Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
>
> Dne Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:37:36 +0100
> Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
>
>> Seems like gzip didn't compress the files in the exact same way, even if
>> the resulting size was the same:
>> $ diff -burN t t2
>> Binary files t/usr/share/doc/docbook-xsl-doc-
Would it be possible to get access to the binaries? I'm interested in
choose-mirror, localechooser, ikiwiki, libperl-critic-perl, and
fbreader, which differed only in package size between the two builds.
That's semi-understandable for choose-mirror, but I can't guess what
would make the others buil
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 04:25:42PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 25/01/08 at 15:36 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Hmm, the debdiff output is not really helpful in deciding whether my
> > packages actually have a problem (doc-linux and libgpod). It just
> > reports a different Installed-Siz
Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 16:37 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 25/01/08 at 15:59 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
[docbok-xsl-doc-html]
> But if the size is the same, why would the Installed-Size differ? I have
> no idea. I've copied the source and the binary packages to
> gluck:~lucas/docbook-x
Hi
Dne Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:37:36 +0100
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> Seems like gzip didn't compress the files in the exact same way, even if
> the resulting size was the same:
> $ diff -burN t t2
> Binary files t/usr/share/doc/docbook-xsl-doc-html/changelog.Debian.gz
> and t2/u
[Lucas Nussbaum]
> I'm not really sure of what we should do about those problems. The
> easiest way to fix them is to use source-only uploads (to avoid
> packages built on broken maintainer machines),
Very good work. I hope to find solutions for all my packages with
this problem.
I agree that s
Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 16:20 +0100 schrieb Jens Seidel:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:59:01PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
[difference in Installed-Size for docbook-xsl-doc-html]
> > copies files from the source to the correct place in the file system. So
> > I checked the files: a) that I hav
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Of course, the list includes some false positives, but they are
> difficult to identify without going through all the debdiff outputs and
> build logs manually.
One false positive is when one of the builds fails, like ack-grep
which fails some times du
On 25/01/08 at 15:59 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 15:25 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
>
> > I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386.
> > - one in a perfectly clean chroot, as I usually do
> > - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were
> > i
On 25 Jan 15:59, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 15:25 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
>
> > I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386.
> > - one in a perfectly clean chroot, as I usually do
> > - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were
> > installed (t
On 25/01/08 at 15:36 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Of course, the list includes some false positives, but they are
> > difficult to identify without going through all the debdiff outputs and
> > build logs manually.
>
> Hmm, t
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Of course, the list includes some false positives, but they are
> difficult to identify without going through all the debdiff outputs and
> build logs manually.
Hmm, the debdiff output is not really helpful in deciding whether my
pa
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:59:01PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 15:25 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
>
> > I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386.
> > - one in a perfectly clean chroot, as I usually do
> > - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossibl
Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 15:25 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386.
> - one in a perfectly clean chroot, as I usually do
> - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were
> installed (take the Sources file, extract the build-deps for al
35 matches
Mail list logo
