Norbert Preining schrieb:
> Dear all!
>
> The other packages which are ready for transition and only waiting are:
> evince, gambas, kdegraphics, pdfcube, tracker, texlive-bin
>
> So let's hope that NO new uploads are happening for the following 8
> days. At least I will refrain from uploading any
Hi Steve,
On Mi, 19 Dez 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> $ grep-excuses luatex
> luatex (0.11.2-1 to 0.20.1-1)
> Maintainer: Debian TeX Maintainers
> Too young, only 9 of 10 days old
> out of date on arm: luatex (from 0.15-1)
> ^^
Hmm, right (why wasn't that shown on
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:09:35PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Can we somehow organize that the poppler transition can be done in a
> reasonable time frame?
Only with the cooperation of the maintainers, of course.
> Currently the problematic packages are (from bjorn.haxx.se):
> . gimp
>
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:00:53PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
>> On Monday, 9 January 2006 15:03, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> > Unfortunately kpdf upstream seems quite reluctant to switch to poppler, see
>> > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11945
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:00:53PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> On Monday, 9 January 2006 15:03, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Unfortunately kpdf upstream seems quite reluctant to switch to poppler, see
> > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119455. I don't know the status of
> > koffice.
> Hi.
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 03:03:07PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
>> I've heard that gpdf is to be replaced by evince in GNOME, which
>> already links dynamically, so it's probably best to remove it for Etch.
>
> While evince is nice it is unfortunatel
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 03:03:07PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> I've heard that gpdf is to be replaced by evince in GNOME, which
> already links dynamically, so it's probably best to remove it for Etch.
While evince is nice it is unfortunately unbearably slow compared to
gpdf/gv/acroread wi
Isaac Clerencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #koffice:
> 16:30 < isaac> it would definitely better to be able to use poppler as a
>external library :)
> 16:31 < mart> isaac: indeed, I heard talk about it - I _think_ someone was
> planning to do it...
> 16:31 < isaac>
On Monday, 9 January 2006 17:00, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> #kpdf:
> #koffice:
So it seems that Etch will ship with kpdf and koffice embedding xpdf source.:(
Best regards
--
Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es
Work: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgp7CiZdil
On Monday, 9 January 2006 15:03, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> >> These source packages embed xpdf source and should be fixed to use
> >> poppler if possible:
> >>
> >> gpdf
> >> pdftohtml
> >> kdegraphics (kpdf)
> >> koffice
> >> libextractor
> >
> > AFAIK, poppler was created
Frank Küster wrote:
>> These source packages embed xpdf source and should be fixed to use poppler
>> if possible:
>>
>> gpdf
>> pdftohtml
>> kdegraphics (kpdf)
>> koffice
>> libextractor
>
> AFAIK, poppler was created by the freedesktop people specifically in
> order to replace xpdf code in Gnome a
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>>>poppler (#344738), orphaned 4 days ago
>>> Reverse Depends: libpoppler-glib-dev libpoppler-dev abiword-plugins
>>>libpoppler-qt-dev libkpathsea4 evince libpoppler0c2-qt tetex-bin
>>>libpoppler0c2-glib
>
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> Now I've learned that poppler has just been orphaned
> (http://bugs.debian.org/344738) and that the sources are already in the
> pkg-gnome svn repository. Will you maintain the package as a team?
(It seems this question is now answered by the adoption
Frank Küster wrote:
>>poppler (#344738), orphaned 4 days ago
>> Reverse Depends: libpoppler-glib-dev libpoppler-dev abiword-plugins
>>libpoppler-qt-dev libkpathsea4 evince libpoppler0c2-qt tetex-bin
>>libpoppler0c2-glib
>
> ... and hopefully some more in the future. There
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 09:33 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
> > through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
> > last week.
> >
> > Total number of orphaned packages: 172
15 matches
Mail list logo