On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:00:53PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote: > On Monday, 9 January 2006 15:03, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Unfortunately kpdf upstream seems quite reluctant to switch to poppler, see > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119455. I don't know the status of > > koffice. > Hi. > > From an hour ago: > #kpdf: > 16:22 < isaac> uhm, refresh my memory > 16:22 < isaac> will kpdf ever use poppler? > 16:22 < isaac> will it be replaced by okular? > 16:24 < tsdgeos> maybe > 16:24 < tsdgeos> maybe > 16:24 < Niedakh> well if poppler's development process becomes more open
Also from that KDE bug report: > It would be nice to see that KDE and GNOME developers really could work > together. ;-) It would be even better to see the poppler people working with Xpdf's upstream. It's good that not all these packages will have statically-linked copies of xpdf code now. It would be even better if poppler wasn't a fork of Xpdf though. Already poppler is behind on a lot of bug fixes from Xpdf 3.01. I imagine most have been merged by now, but there's a lot of duplicate effort involved. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
