Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:08:00PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
>
>>Based on the text on the w.d.o frontpage it seems that Michael Ivey
>>has provided the tar.gz with all the w.d.n contents.
>
>
> I would like to make a desperate plee that some attempt is m
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:58:59AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I might be slow, but can you explain why we need a license for this?
> I do not need to license my books, but I do need to license my
> software. Why should the wiki documents be treated more like software
> than a book?
your
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Jon Dowland]
>> I would like to make a desperate plee that some attempt is made to
>> incorporate a clear indication of the licence under which material on
>> this wiki is available under, either with a user-readable prompt or
>> machine-readable me
[Jon Dowland]
> I would like to make a desperate plee that some attempt is made to
> incorporate a clear indication of the licence under which material on
> this wiki is available under, either with a user-readable prompt or
> machine-readable metadata (ideally both).
I might be slow, but can you
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:13, Jon Dowland wrote:
> I would like to make a desperate plee that some attempt is made to
> incorporate a clear indication of the licence under which material on
> this wiki is available under, either with a user-readable prompt or
> machine-readable metadata
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:08:00PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
> Based on the text on the w.d.o frontpage it seems that Michael Ivey
> has provided the tar.gz with all the w.d.n contents.
I would like to make a desperate plee that some attempt is made to
incorporate a clear indica
* Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-05 10:04:54]:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
> > compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
> > from the old .net wiki to the new .org one
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:41:40AM +0200, Andreas Fester wrote:
> I thought that the wiki was to be moved to mediawiki?
>
> http://wiki.debian.net/?HelpMoveDebianWikiToMediaWiki
>
> Will w.d.org be a replacement for w.d.net? With the latter
> leading to the same page once the migration is done?
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
> compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
> from the old .net wiki to the new .org one.
This is the first I've heard of plans for a wiki under the offi
also sprach Michael D. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.09.03.1550 +0200]:
> I have made it read-only, and am happy to use mod_rewrite to send
This is a good idea, but only if the migration can be completed
soon. Otherwise I suggest making it writable again until a migration
path exists, and then to
On Sep 3, 2005, at 6:13 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
at which point it would make sense to discourage any further
edits to the old wiki
I have made it read-only, and am happy to use mod_rewrite to send
wiki.d.n requests to wiki.d.o ... or to change the CNAME to point
directly to wiki.d.o, as
also sprach Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.09.03.1410 +0200]:
> member. I wonder whether with moin moin, there needs to happen anything else
> too, for example (index files rebuild or something?). Unfortunately I'm
From my experience, there are no indices.
--
Please do not send
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:10:57PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> I wonder whether with moin moin, there needs to happen anything else
> too, for example (index files rebuild or something?).
No, there are only cache files which are rebuilt if needed.
Bastian
--
Conquest is easy.
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:08:00PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > I did not find migration scripts between the two wikis. Do they
> > exist? Is someone who is familiar with both wikis interested in
> > writing o
also sprach Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.09.03.1308
+0200]:
> Based on the text on the w.d.o frontpage it seems that Michael
> Ivey has provided the tar.gz with all the w.d.n contents.
... at which point it would make sense to discourage any further
edits to the old wi
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> I did not find migration scripts between the two wikis. Do they
> exist? Is someone who is familiar with both wikis interested in
> writing one?
Based on the text on the w.d.o frontpage it seems that Michael Ivey
has provided th
On 10401 March 1977, Andreas Fester wrote:
> Will w.d.org be a replacement for w.d.net?
Thats the intention of it.
> With the latter leading to the same page once the migration is done?
That depends on the one who has it right now, but would be the best, yes.
--
bye Joerg
[Clint]: I'm convin
I thought that the wiki was to be moved to mediawiki?
http://wiki.debian.net/?HelpMoveDebianWikiToMediaWiki
Will w.d.org be a replacement for w.d.net? With the latter
leading to the same page once the migration is done?
Best Regards,
Andreas
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
The wiki markup la
la, 2005-09-03 kello 01:34 +0200, Andreas Schuldei kirjoitti:
> The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
> compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
> from the old .net wiki to the new .org one.
wiki.debian.net seems to be running kwiki, not twiki, in case that
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 01:34 +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
> compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
> from the old .net wiki to the new .org one. (the debconf team for
> one is interested in using the features of moin
20 matches
Mail list logo
