Re: dh_make and dep5

2011-03-10 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:54:19AM +, Alessio Treglia wrote: > >  Should I fill a bug report ? > By reading the changelog [1], it seems the maintainer has already > accomplished that. > > [1] http://goo.gl/oomj3 Yes, see /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/ -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Des

Re: dh_make and dep5

2011-03-10 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On to, 2011-03-10 at 10:42 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > What is the status of dep5(*) copyright file in debian ? I am using > dh_make for preparing packages, and I had report that the default > generated copyright template should be replaced by a dep5 one. > Should I fill a bug report ? E

Re: dh_make and dep5

2011-03-10 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >  Should I fill a bug report ? By reading the changelog [1], it seems the maintainer has already accomplished that. [1] http://goo.gl/oomj3 -- Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.

Re: dh_make issue/suggestion

2003-06-04 Thread Andreas Metzler
Jason Pepas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > dh_make does a good job of providing reasonable defaults, with one > exception I have encountered. [...] > finally, I propose an addition be made to the new maintainer's guide > to point out that [...] > again, I am new to all this, so constructive cr

Re: dh_make

1998-10-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 06 Oct 1998, John Lapeyre wrote: >On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Craig Small wrote: >csmall>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >csmall>> I have recently created a debian/rules file with dh_make, it used >"-g" for >csmall>> CXXFLAGS and "-g -O2" for CFLAGS. Is there any reason for not using >-O2 for >csmall>>

Re: dh_make

1998-10-06 Thread Ole J. Tetlie
*-John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Craig Small wrote: | csmall>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | csmall>> I have recently created a debian/rules file with dh_make, it used "-g" for | csmall>> CXXFLAGS and "-g -O2" for CFLAGS. Is there any reason for not using -O2 for | csmall>>

Re: dh_make

1998-10-05 Thread John Lapeyre
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Craig Small wrote: csmall>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: csmall>> I have recently created a debian/rules file with dh_make, it used "-g" for csmall>> CXXFLAGS and "-g -O2" for CFLAGS. Is there any reason for not using -O2 for csmall>> C++ compilation? Also do we really want debugg

Re: dh_make

1998-10-05 Thread Craig Small
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have recently created a debian/rules file with dh_make, it used "-g" for > CXXFLAGS and "-g -O2" for CFLAGS. Is there any reason for not using -O2 for > C++ compilation? Also do we really want debugging symbols in all the > binaries? > > The C++ code compiled with -O