On Tue, 06 Oct 1998, John Lapeyre wrote: >On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Craig Small wrote: >csmall>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >csmall>> I have recently created a debian/rules file with dh_make, it used >"-g" for >csmall>> CXXFLAGS and "-g -O2" for CFLAGS. Is there any reason for not using >-O2 for >csmall>> C++ compilation? Also do we really want debugging symbols in all the >csmall>> binaries? >csmall>> >csmall>> The C++ code compiled with -O2 seems to run well, so I don't think >there's >csmall>> any compiler error for my setup (latest EGCS) at least... >csmall> >csmall>I don't think we need to include debugging code, I'm not sure where the >-g >csmall>comes from in the CXXFLAGS as I thought I didn't set that anywhere. >csmall>scooter$ grep CXX /usr/lib/debhelper/dh_make/*/* >csmall>scooter$
> Maybe I don't understand what you-all are talking about,... but >doesn't policy require compiling with -g and then stripping ? Last time I >read the policy manual, this was the case. The issue for me is not the "-g" but the absense of "-O2" for C++ code. I've just changed the debian/rules files for all KDE packages in the KDE CVS to use -O2 for C++ code and they work fine (presumably slightly faster but it's difficult to measure). -- Got no future, got no past. Here today, built to last.
