Hi Matt!
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Deborphan is nearly perfect for this. Right now, it just keeps track of
> > whether a package was installed to satisfy a dependancy, or because you
> > really want it. If instead of the y/n question it uses for this, it
> > asked _why_ you
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I believe it is debfoster that works the way you described, while deborphan
> merely finds installed library packages that do not satisfy any dependencies.
You're right of course.
--
see shy jo
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 11:18:35AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > deborphan might be tweakable to do this. pkg-order could also be useful.
> > Apt 0.5 now has a python interface, and possibly a perl interface, so
> > that's probably usable too.
>
> Deborphan is nearly perfect
Anthony Towns wrote:
> deborphan might be tweakable to do this. pkg-order could also be useful.
> Apt 0.5 now has a python interface, and possibly a perl interface, so
> that's probably usable too.
Deborphan is nearly perfect for this. Right now, it just keeps track of
whether a package was insta
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:19:08PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> I am installing some new servers and I want a list of the reason for each
> package being installed (no software is to be installed without a good
> reason).
Interesting idea...
> I then want to have a program go through this file
5 matches
Mail list logo
