Mark Ferlatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I'm not sure why ssmtp has TLS disabled by default; perhaps a bug should be
> filed? It seems like it would provide all of the needed outgoing MTA
> functionality without requiring a daemon.
Copyright? At least the version in woody is straightforwa
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> SSMTP is not acceptable for those of us that use SMTP AUTH+TLS, unless
> it supports those (it didn't, last time I looked). In fact, there don't
> appear to be any "dumb" MTAs (like ssmtp or nullmailer) that support TLS
> and SMTP authentication. Thi
Joe Wreschnig said on Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:32:14PM -0500:
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 18:04, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> > I'm not sure why ssmtp has TLS disabled by default; perhaps a bug should be
> > filed? It seems like it would provide all of the needed outgoing MTA
> > functionality without requir
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 18:04, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> I'm not sure why ssmtp has TLS disabled by default; perhaps a bug should be
> filed? It seems like it would provide all of the needed outgoing MTA
> functionality without requiring a daemon.
Looking at the SSMTP bug page, the package seems to be
Joe Wreschnig said on Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:43:49PM -0500:
> Interesting. I'm running unstable, but I can't find instructions on
> enabling TLS anywhere (nor does SSMTP seem to link to any TLS
> libraries). I see mention of it in the README (specifically, only a
> credit for it), but not the manu
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 17:09, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> ssmtp in unstable supports TLS and certificate based AUTH (so you can
> authenticate on a per machine basis for relay). It appears to have AUTH
> CRAM-MD5 support, but it's unclear if that's distributable (according to
> comments in the source).
Joe Wreschnig said on Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:39:10PM -0500:
> > And is a much better choice than expecting every user to locally
> > configure smtp settings in the MUA. Lack of direct-SMTP support in mutt
> > is a good thing.
>
> SSMTP is not acceptable for those of us that use SMTP AUTH+TLS, un
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 09:27, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:51:12PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:35:29AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > > IMHO using any local mailer is a bad idea on a desktop system. You send
> > > off the mail, your MUA says "Sent
8 matches
Mail list logo
