On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 18:04, Mark Ferlatte wrote: > I'm not sure why ssmtp has TLS disabled by default; perhaps a bug should be > filed? It seems like it would provide all of the needed outgoing MTA > functionality without requiring a daemon.
Looking at the SSMTP bug page, the package seems to be very unmaintained. :/ Two important bugs, one of which I'd consider critical, both with patches, and no update for 6 months. I'm going to test a package with TLS (and probably the other patches in the BTS); if I don't find anything wrong, I'll file another bug. -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
