On 21 August 2007 at 12:19, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| Hi Thomas,
|
| On 21 August 2007 at 19:02, Thomas Weber wrote:
| | Hi,
| |
| | Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2007, 11:11 -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| | > E.g. a good example of how it's nice to have the code in one place (as
| | > oppos
Hi Thomas,
On 21 August 2007 at 19:02, Thomas Weber wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2007, 11:11 -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > E.g. a good example of how it's nice to have the code in one place (as
| > opposed to dozens of debian/rules files) is that just recently I learned
abo
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2007, 11:11 -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> E.g. a good example of how it's nice to have the code in one place (as
> opposed to dozens of debian/rules files) is that just recently I learned about
> a neat x11 framebuffer server wrapper,
Which package is that? I mi
Hi Soeren,
On 21 August 2007 at 11:20, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
| OK, I just had a look at r-cran-fseries, it is indeed a one-liner as you
| said. So creating debian packages from cran-r-packages seems easy. What
Yes. debian/rules just calls /usr/share/R/debian/r-cran.mk which has the
required s
Dirk Eddelbuettel dijo [Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:26:31PM -0500]:
>
> UseR! 2007 at Iowa State University, Ames, IA, August 8-10, 2007
> (...)
Wow - Congratulations, this paper is quite interesting to me - partly
because next week I will be presenting one quite similar to it ;-)
http://vienna.yapc
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 20:15 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Hi Soeren, Hi Steffen
Hi Dirk,
[lots of agreement that would want to have more high quality R packages]
> | > Btw, wouldn't you be interested to join our effort? I'd offer sponsoring
> | > SHOGUN for Debian as a compensation :-)
> |
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 02:10 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> On Saturday 18 August 2007 22:45:56 Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 14:44 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> > > On Saturday 18 August 2007 12:36:41 Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> [...]
> > Well I don't know how much should be
Hi Soeren, Hi Steffen
Now back from a short vacation in Michigan, I'll chime in on the ongoing
discussion.
On 18 August 2007 at 22:45, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
| On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 14:44 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
| > On Saturday 18 August 2007 12:36:41 Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
| > > On Tu
On Saturday 18 August 2007 22:45:56 Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 14:44 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> > On Saturday 18 August 2007 12:36:41 Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
[...]
> Well I don't know how much should be split up. But I guess this depends
> also on the number of debian re
On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 14:44 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> On Saturday 18 August 2007 12:36:41 Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 21:26 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
[...]
> > esoteric/brand new research/unstable R-packes. However I would want to
> > see the more mature bioconduc
On Saturday 18 August 2007 12:36:41 Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 21:26 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> First of all I really like your efforts of debianizing R packages. I
> think debian is currently well suited to be used in ``science'' but yes
> there is a lot more one can d
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 21:26 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Hi Dirk,
> UseR! 2007 at Iowa State University, Ames, IA, August 8-10, 2007
[...]
> II. Paper / presentation on 2000 new Debian packages --
> "Would you like 2000 new Debian packages with that?"
> ===
12 matches
Mail list logo
