Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread Matthias Klose
David Pashley writes: > On Jul 16, 2005 at 14:27, Stephen Gran praised the llamas by saying: > > This one time, at band camp, Ralf Treinen said: > > > I have a (probably very stupid) question: > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:09:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > > > > If one of your

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Ralf Treinen writes: > I have a (probably very stupid) question: > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:09:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > If one of your packages needs to be transitioned, DO NOT upload it before > > the C++ libraries it depends on have successfully made the transition. > > Is t

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 06:22:21AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:44:03PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: >> >> I have a (probably very stupid) question: > >> >> On Sat, Jul

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 06:22:21AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:44:03PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > >> I have a (probably very stupid) question: > >> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:09:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:44:03PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: >> I have a (probably very stupid) question: > >> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:09:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> > If one of your packages needs to be transitioned, DO NOT upload it bef

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread David Nusinow
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 05:09:28PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:24:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Oh, ugh. I think the XSF was essentially following Ubuntu's lead > > here; no one realized, or thought to check, that the C++ bits weren't > > exported a

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:24:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Oh, ugh. I think the XSF was essentially following Ubuntu's lead > here; no one realized, or thought to check, that the C++ bits weren't > exported as part of the ABI. Ah... that was my guess... > David, do you want me to pu

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:44:03PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > I have a (probably very stupid) question: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:09:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > If one of your packages needs to be transitioned, DO NOT upload it before > > the C++ libraries it depends on have succes

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:00:12PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:09:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Also, for those who aren't aware, the new xorg packages now in > > unstable are also implicated in the C++ transition, because libGLU is > > implemented in

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:09:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Also, for those who aren't aware, the new xorg packages now in > unstable are also implicated in the C++ transition, because libGLU is > implemented in C++. Keyword: implemented. All of GLU's interfaces are C, not C++, so "tr

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread René van Bevern
On 16.07.05, David Pashley wrote: > On Jul 16, 2005 at 14:27, Stephen Gran praised the llamas by saying: > > libgmp3, only Recommend: libstdc++ as it is a c library with c++ bindings > Shouldn't the C++ bindings be split out and depend on libgmp3 and > libstdc++? This has been done in course of th

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread David Pashley
On Jul 16, 2005 at 14:27, Stephen Gran praised the llamas by saying: > This one time, at band camp, Ralf Treinen said: > > I have a (probably very stupid) question: > > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:09:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > > If one of your packages needs to be transitioned,

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Ralf Treinen said: > I have a (probably very stupid) question: > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:09:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > If one of your packages needs to be transitioned, DO NOT upload it before > > the C++ libraries it depends on have successfully mad

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change

2005-07-16 Thread Ralf Treinen
I have a (probably very stupid) question: On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:09:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > If one of your packages needs to be transitioned, DO NOT upload it before > the C++ libraries it depends on have successfully made the transition. Is there an easy way to find out which of