On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 05:09:28PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:24:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Oh, ugh. I think the XSF was essentially following Ubuntu's lead > > here; no one realized, or thought to check, that the C++ bits weren't > > exported as part of the ABI. > > Ah... that was my guess... > > > David, do you want me to put together a patch that updates the > > Provides/Conflicts of libglu1-xorg appropriately? (Might as well > > keep the name change now that it's been done, I think.) > > The package name is not really a problem (libglu1-xorg is fine). Just > the "Provides" needs to be fixed and set back to libglu1. > > If someone knows of a case where this breaks, please speak up now.
I'll fix this in the next upload. Thanks for calling it to my attention. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
