Re: Evolution

2022-01-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2021-12-31 at 09:10 -0500, Devops PK Carlisle LLC wrote: > Just a quick question as to whether Evolution Mail is still > supported/updated? You have already gotten an answer, but for future reference, this sort of question should be asked on Debian support channels not debian-devel. http

Re: Evolution

2021-12-31 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Am 31. Dezember 2021 15:10:14 MEZ schrieb Devops PK Carlisle LLC : >Just a quick question as to whether Evolution Mail is still >supported/updated? > >Wikipedia and Gnome support pages don't have much information on it. Looking at the package tracker under https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/evol

Re: Evolution 2.4 in Sid

2005-11-24 Thread Noèl Köthe
Am Mittwoch, den 23.11.2005, 21:27 -0600 schrieb Ron Johnson: > Where can I go to discover it's status? The evolution packagers are organized here: https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-evolution/ Maybe ask on their mailinglist: https://alioth.debian.org/mail/?group_id=30664 -- Noèl Köthe

Re: Evolution Contacts

2005-11-02 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Il giorno mer, 02/11/2005 alle 09.15 +, Ross Burton ha scritto: > On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 15:14 -0500, Alejandro Bonilla wrote: > > Someone sent an email I dunno if here or in evolution-hackers ML but I also > > lost All my contacts after upgrading yesterday in Sid! ;0( > > Close Evolution and

Re: Evolution Contacts

2005-11-02 Thread Ross Burton
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 15:14 -0500, Alejandro Bonilla wrote: > Someone sent an email I dunno if here or in evolution-hackers ML but I also > lost All my contacts after upgrading yesterday in Sid! ;0( Close Evolution and killall evolution-data-server-1.4, then restart Evolution. That *should* work

Re: Evolution 2.x

2004-12-05 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Anders Karlsson in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > How do I best collect the information that the package maintainer would > like? Hi, if you file a regular bug, the maintainer will contact you to provide the information he needs. He is the one who knows the package best. Besides that, there's strace,

Re: Evolution and GnuPG

2002-01-07 Thread Scott James Remnant
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2002-01-06 at 06:38, Oliver Elphick wrote: > > I've noticed that Evolution (1.0-4) is very prone to report bad > > signatures. To start with I thought it was down to use by the sender of > > a particular mailer, but I am beginning to doubt that. > >

Re: Evolution and GnuPG

2002-01-06 Thread Joe Drew
On Sun, 2002-01-06 at 06:38, Oliver Elphick wrote: > I've noticed that Evolution (1.0-4) is very prone to report bad > signatures. To start with I thought it was down to use by the sender of > a particular mailer, but I am beginning to doubt that. This is a known bug in Evolution: see http://bugz

Re: Evolution and GnuPG

2002-01-06 Thread Stephan Dietl
Hello! Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Oliver Elphick a écrit : > > I've noticed that Evolution (1.0-4) is very prone to report bad > > signatures. To start with I thought it was down to use by the sender of > > a particular mailer, but I am beginning to doubt that. > [sneep] > >

Re: Evolution and GnuPG

2002-01-06 Thread Josselin Mouette
Oliver Elphick a écrit : > I've noticed that Evolution (1.0-4) is very prone to report bad > signatures. To start with I thought it was down to use by the sender of > a particular mailer, but I am beginning to doubt that. [sneep] > Do other mail clients give similar results? I have noticed the sa

Re: Evolution and GnuPG

2002-01-06 Thread Robert Kosinski
Hm, I've already deleted the messages in question, but I know I always get good signatures from Anthony Towns and Branden Robinson. I also believe I got a good signature from that Michael Meskes message as well. In fact, I don't think I've seen a bad signature. This is mutt 1.3.25-1, gnupg 1.0.6