Oliver Elphick a écrit : > I've noticed that Evolution (1.0-4) is very prone to report bad > signatures. To start with I thought it was down to use by the sender of > a particular mailer, but I am beginning to doubt that. [sneep] > Do other mail clients give similar results?
I have noticed the same problem with evolution. It reports a number of GPG signatures as bad, when besides mutt reports them as good. The problem includes all mails written with gnus/oort, but also some others from various mailers (and I couldn't figure out which thing in the headers makes it get wrong). -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
pgpGzUHWXnuf5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
