On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 03:51:06PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > [CCing debian-devel to get feedback on a de facto 'standard' tool].
> > So to summarise: for many years the perl package has provided
> > /usr/bin/rename, a
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> [CCing debian-devel to get feedback on a de facto 'standard' tool].
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 03:34:29PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:59:04PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Tue, 14 Jan
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 05:23:32PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Back in 2004 before I was a debian developer, I was looking to package a
> script I wrote called patmv. patmv was inspired by rename perl but has
> slightly different behavior. You can find the thread about it here:
>
> https://li
Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:28:03AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> Hi Gregor,
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:31:02PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> > It's the package for the CPAN File::Rename distribution, and
>> > therefore named accordingly to
>> > https://ww
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:28:03AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Hi Gregor,
>
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:31:02PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > It's the package for the CPAN File::Rename distribution, and
> > therefore named accordingly to
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/p
On 2014-02-03 00:41, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-02 at 19:42 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> 1) Have perl Depend on libfile-rename-perl (and therefore have the
>latter become Priority: standard)
The usual solution would
Hi Gregor,
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:31:02PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> It's the package for the CPAN File::Rename distribution, and
> therefore named accordingly to
> https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/perl-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-package_names
> in Debian.
Thanks for po
On Sun, 2014-02-02 at 19:42 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> >
> > So to summarise: for many years the perl package has provided
> > /usr/bin/rename, a stanalone utility implemented in perl. The issue is we
> > don't want to provide
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 02.02.2014, 19:31 +0100 schrieb gregor herrmann:
> On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 18:05:45 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > A
> > > maintained version is available as a separate package,
> > > libfile-rename-perl.
> > This is a frustrating package name for an end user binary. Reminds
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 18:05:45 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > A
> > maintained version is available as a separate package, libfile-rename-perl.
> This is a frustrating package name for an end user binary. Reminds
> me of the difficulty I have remembering which package the LWP-tools
> "GET" and "
Hi,
I regularly use rename(1) and miss it on non-Debian systems. The fact perl
provides it currently doesn't matter to me (or I'd argue any end user)
> On 2 Feb 2014, at 15:12, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> A
> maintained version is available as a separate package, libfile-rename-perl.
This is a
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> So to summarise: for many years the perl package has provided
> /usr/bin/rename, a stanalone utility implemented in perl. The issue is we
> don't want to provide the utility from the perl package any more because
> it's been a
[CCing debian-devel to get feedback on a de facto 'standard' tool].
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 03:34:29PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:59:04PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > > I suggest something like
> > >
> > > - package
13 matches
Mail list logo
