2013-06-11 17:13 Barry deFreese:
On 6/11/2013 11:56 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 07:04:30AM -0400, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
Normally you would keep the old version's changelog. But even if you don't,
there's no need
for an ITP in cases like this, or when part of a packag
At some point in the recent past the SDL team was effectively dead and
the games team took over maintenance. ISTR sponsoring at least one upload
of an SDL component during that time. However, it's possible that the SDL
time was revived since.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/11/2013 11:56 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 07:04:30AM -0400, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
>>> Normally you would keep the old version's changelog. But even if you don't,
>>> there's no need
>>> for an ITP in cases like this,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 07:04:30AM -0400, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> > Normally you would keep the old version's changelog. But even if you don't,
> > there's no need for an ITP in cases like this, or when part of a package
> > starts
> > to be shipped from a different source upstream. It's like ope
On 06/11/2013 04:34 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> Normally you would keep the old version's changelog. But even if you don't,
> there's no need for an ITP in cases like this, or when part of a package
> starts
> to be shipped from a different source upstream. It's like opening an ITP for
On 11/06/13 03:27, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:31:07PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:17:26PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bu
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:31:07PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:17:26PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > > > > >>> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for
> > > > > >> SONAME
> >
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:17:26PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > > > >>> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for
> > > > >> SONAME
> > > > >> bumps...
> > > > >
> > > > > It's a massive new major release. Think
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:42:55PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:12:22PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > > >>> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
> > > >>
> > > >> Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for
> > > >> SONAME
> > > >> bumps...
>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:12:22PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > >>> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
> > >>
> > >> Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for SONAME
> > >> bumps...
> > >
> > > It's a massive new major release. Think perl5 vs perl6.
> >
> > The point i
We'll need binaries for sdl 1 and 2 coexisting from two different source
packages I believe.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0d0aca7b-918f-4ba1-80e1-f1f
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:06:24AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On 10-06-13 10:32, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:59:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >> On 08-06-13 00:33, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> >>> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
> >>
> >> Isn't this p
On 10-06-13 10:32, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:59:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On 08-06-13 00:33, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>>> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
>>
>> Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for SONAME
>> bumps...
>
>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:59:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On 08-06-13 00:33, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> > * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
>
> Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for SONAME
> bumps...
It's a massive new major release. Think perl5 v
On 08-06-13 00:33, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Debian SDL packages maintainers
>
>
> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
> Version : 2.0.0~rc1
> Upstream Author : Sam Lantinga
> * URL : http://www.libsdl.org/tmp/SDL_mi
15 matches
Mail list logo
