Re: libc6-dev have unmet dependencies in stable-bullseye

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 04:42:00PM +0100, Markus wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for your answer. > > > If you used debootstrap or mmdebstrap to create your own chroot or > > container that only includes bullseye, and not bullseye-security or > > bullseye-updates, then you would get libc6 (= 2.31-13+d

Re: libc6-dev have unmet dependencies in stable-bullseye

Hi, Thank you for your answer. > If you used debootstrap or mmdebstrap to create your own chroot or > container that only includes bullseye, and not bullseye-security or > bullseye-updates, then you would get libc6 (= 2.31-13+deb11u4) in > the chroot/container, and libc6-dev (= 2.31-13+deb11u4) w

Re: libc6-dev have unmet dependencies in stable-bullseye

On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 11:21:57 +0100, Markus Ritzmann wrote: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > libc6-dev : Depends: libc6 (= 2.31-13+deb11u4) but 2.31-13+deb11u5 is to be > > installed > > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > > Step to reproduce:

Re: libc6 with support for old kernels

Ph. Marek a écrit : > Hello everybody, > > > I'd like to ask for some help. > > I have some machines running an old kernel (2.4.25, from Suse7.3). > Now I'd like to get some newer software running on them, *without* > re-installing the whole system. > (That would be gnuplot, graphviz, subversion

Re: libc6 with support for old kernels

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:56:34AM +0200, Ph. Marek wrote: > Hello everybody, > > > I'd like to ask for some help. > > I have some machines running an old kernel (2.4.25, from Suse7.3). > Now I'd like to get some newer software running on them, *without* > re-installing the whole system. We d

Re: libc6 with support for old kernels

Hello Michael, > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:56:34AM +0200, Ph. Marek wrote: >> I'd like to ask for some help. > > Please ask on debian-user, debian-devel is a development list. will do. I thought that as my target solution would involve a differently compiled libc5 packet that the -devel list was

Re: libc6 with support for old kernels

Hi, On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:56:34AM +0200, Ph. Marek wrote: > I'd like to ask for some help. Please ask on debian-user, debian-devel is a development list. regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

On Oct 26, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe hurd and m68k porters can maintain a glibc package using an old > version (2.3.6 ??) together? Well that's for after Etch. What for? Modern threaded software will require TLS more and more. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: D

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

- Original Message - From: "Michael Banck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:45 AM Subject: Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: We plan to upload [glibc-2.5] right after the releas

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

Thomas Schwinge a écrit : > Hello! > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I >>> haven't received any answer. > > That is untrue

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

Hello! On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I > > haven't received any answer. That is untrue. I replied for the Hurd people. >

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > We plan to upload [glibc-2.5] right after the release of etch. > > This version works on all architectures, but m68k, hurd and hppa which > don't have TLS support. > > For hppa the work is almost done, I am currently building the p

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:42:08PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > When Sarge was released, amd64 was not officially released but had an > unofficial release. why not do the same with the hopes tha etch+1 will > see m68k in relase shape? That's exactly what we're planning to do. -- Home is where you

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/06 21:42, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:21:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> Ron Johnson a écrit : On 10/25/06 04:53, Mar

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

On Wednesday 25 October 2006 20:42, Kevin Mark wrote: > When Sarge was released, amd64 was not officially released but had an > unofficial release. why not do the same with the hopes tha etch+1 will > see m68k in relase shape? AMD64 is a modern architecture. M68k is an architecture that saw its pr

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:21:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Ron Johnson a écrit : > >> > >> On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > >>> * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]: > [

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/2006 11:21 AM, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >>>Ron Johnson a écrit : >>> On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]: > > [snip] > >>>For m

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Ron Johnson a écrit : >> >> On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >>> * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]: [snip] > For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago,

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

Ron Johnson a écrit : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >> * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]: >>> Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? >> No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely n

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]: >> Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? > > No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely new and untested libc in > at t

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

* Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061025 11:37]: > Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? No. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

* Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 11:48]: > > Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? > libc6 is frozen (at 2.3.x -- I assume you mean 2.4, not 2.5?), so no. 2.5 came out a few days ago. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]: > Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely new and untested libc in at this point of the release cycle. In fact, we don't even have 2.4 because there are a number of arch

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 04:36:42AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? libc6 is frozen (at 2.3.x -- I assume you mean 2.4, not 2.5?), so no. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: libc6 bug? or C programming error?

Oliver Elphick writes: > On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 00:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > /* map the file and load an extra page in case the new line expands the > > > file across the page boundary; adding 2 allows for the truncating > > > effect of integer division. Forcing an extra pa

Re: libc6 bug? or C programming error?

On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 01:05, Steve Greenland wrote: > > sprintf(buf, "Failed to open %s for writing", filename); > > > Where did you make 'buf' point to any usuable memory? Everything after > this is bogus... You are right that that w

Re: libc6 bug? or C programming error?

On 02-Dec-03, 18:37 (CST), Oliver Elphick wrote: > / > Write a line in user_clusters > / > void write_cluster_line(const char *user, const char *group, >

Re: libc6 bug? or C programming error?

On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 00:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > /* map the file and load an extra page in case the new line expands the > > file across the page boundary; adding 2 allows for the truncating > > effect of integer division. Forcing an extra page ensures > > that we can ide

Re: libc6 bug? or C programming error?

> /* map the file and load an extra page in case the new line expands the > file across the page boundary; adding 2 allows for the truncating > effect of integer division. Forcing an extra page ensures > that we can identify the end of the buffer by finding a NUL */ No, it does n

Re: libc6-i686 only for 2.6 kernels? was: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:54:18PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:29:06PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > It could. I decided that building four was excessive and having > > the act of installing libc6-i686 act to disable NPTL would be a little > > bit too strange. > >

Re: libc6-i686 only for 2.6 kernels? was: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:29:06PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > It could. I decided that building four was excessive and having > the act of installing libc6-i686 act to disable NPTL would be a little > bit too strange. Can you clue me in as to why the non-optimized libc6 package will work w

Re: libc6-i686 only for 2.6 kernels? was: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:13:19PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:19:39PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:43:09PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > And Nikita just pointed out t

Re: libc6-i686 only for 2.6 kernels? was: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:19:39PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:43:09PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > > And Nikita just pointed out there's libc6-i686. It might make sense to add > > > linux-i686 too.

Re: libc6-i686 only for 2.6 kernels? was: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:21:57PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 15:29, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:08:16AM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > > > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13P

Re: libc6-i686 only for 2.6 kernels? was: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:28, Isaac To wrote: > Unless one patch the kernel to support all the things like . files in > /proc, futex, O(1) scheduler, ...  (i.e., as in the "2.4" kernel of > Redhat). I have been seriously considering a kernel-patch-2.4-redhat package which contains a patch with every

Re: libc6-i686 only for 2.6 kernels? was: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 15:29, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:08:16AM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > >> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:43:09PM +0100,

Re: libc6-i686 only for 2.6 kernels? was: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:28:29AM +0800, Isaac To wrote: > > "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Daniel> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:43:09PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > And > >> Nikita just

Re: libc6-i686 only for 2.6 kernels? was: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:08:16AM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:43:09PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > >> > And Nikita just pointed out there's

Re: libc6-i686 only for 2.6 kernels? was: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:43:09PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: >> > And Nikita just pointed out there's libc6-i686. It might make sense to add >> > linux-i686 too. I'm open for discussing

Re: libc6-i686 only for 2.6 kernels? was: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Daniel> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:43:09PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > And >> Nikita just pointed out there's libc6-i686. It might make sense to >> add >

Re: libc6-i686 only for 2.6 kernels? was: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:43:09PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > And Nikita just pointed out there's libc6-i686. It might make sense to add > > linux-i686 too. I'm open for discussing that, but this discussion doesn't > > belong on the

Re: libc6 (security) update does not restart system-services?

On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:41:33 +0900 GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > So everytime we have to restart all binaries which use a library > > > > involving security-problem. In additionm this problem affects > > > > not only debian packages, but user-built binaries. > > I also think i

Re: libc6 (security) update does not restart system-services?

On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 11:14:41PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Well, it's hard to display package name. However > > > > lsof | grep dpkg-new | awk '{print $1, $8}' | sort +0 > > > > make a list which describes what binary uses old libraries replaced by > > dpkg. To

Re: libc6 (security) update does not restart system-services?

GOTO Masanori wrote: > Well, it's hard to display package name. However > > lsof | grep dpkg-new | awk '{print $1, $8}' | sort +0 > > make a list which describes what binary uses old libraries replaced by > dpkg. To show more user friendly, it needs to remember that what > library files ar

Re: libc6 (security) update does not restart system-services?

At Sat, 19 Apr 2003 10:52:51 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > > [1 ] > Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > or use tools like "lsof" or my package of "memstat" to find loaded > > and deleeted libraries. > > I believe this process to be much to complicated to be used > successfully in the general case. You woul

Re: libc6 (security) update does not restart system-services?

At Sun, 20 Apr 2003 08:55:11 +0200, Markus Amersdorfer wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 18:04:01 +0200 > Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 12:05:49AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > So everytime we have to restart all binaries which use a library > > > invol

Re: libc6 (security) update does not restart system-services?

On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 18:04:01 +0200 Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 12:05:49AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > So everytime we have to restart all binaries which use a library > > involving security-problem. In additionm this problem affects not > > only debian

Re: libc6 (security) update does not restart system-services?

On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 00:05:49 +0900 GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Woody comes with libc6 2.2.5-11.5, so the section about > > > > restarting services is never reached. > > > > > > > > This leaves the machine vulnerable as all services use the old > > > > library until restarted.

Re: libc6 (security) update does not restart system-services?

Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > GOTO Masanori wrote: > > So everytime we have to restart all binaries which use a library > > involving security-problem. In additionm this problem affects not > > only debian packages, but user-built binaries. > > Well, this is why it is most often described in the secur

Re: libc6 (security) update does not restart system-services?

On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 12:05:49AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > So everytime we have to restart all binaries which use a library > involving security-problem. In additionm this problem affects not > only debian packages, but user-built binaries. Well, this is why it is most often described in th

Re: libc6 (security) update does not restart system-services?

At Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:24:17 +0200, Markus Amersdorfer wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 13:06:07 +0900 > GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.postinst checks for "$1" == > > > "configure" > > > (which is the case when updating, isn't it?). If true it > > > aft

Re: libc6 (security) update does not restart system-services?

On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 13:06:07 +0900 GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi! > > I've recently upgraded my Woody-Servers according to the latest > > libc6 security update (DSA-282), and it seems that services were > > _not_ reloaded by the post-install-script!? > > > > [...] > > > > - /var/l

Re: libc6 (security) update does not restart system-services?

At Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:28:02 +0200, Markus Amersdorfer wrote: > I've recently upgraded my Woody-Servers according to the latest > libc6 security update (DSA-282), and it seems that services were _not_ > reloaded by the post-install-script!? > > More detailed information: > > When investigating th

Re: libc6 broken?

Hello Mike, * Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010427 11:41]: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:40:24PM -0500, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake > forth: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this

Re: libc6 broken?

Hello, * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010427 07:44]: > > * Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 21:40]: > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > > > error-msg: > > > > /lib/libc.so.

Re: libc6 broken?

On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:40:24PM -0500, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake forth: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > error-msg: > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: libc6 broken?

> * Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 21:40]: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > > error-msg: > > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > /lib/libc.so.6:

Re: libc6 broken?

Hello, * Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 21:40]: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > error-msg: > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > /lib/libc.so.6: undef

Re: libc6 broken?

On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > error-msg: > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Uh, why do you have lib

Re: libc6 broken?

On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200 , Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > Hello, > I upgraded to unstable and now, my libc6 seems to be borken. works fine here. it wasn't upgraded in quite a while > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > error-msg: > /lib/libc.so.6

Re: Libc6 functions such as wprintf() (widechar/multibyte/UNICODE support)

On Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:26:34 +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >From: Jerry Lundström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Libc6 functions such as wprintf() (widechar/multibyte/UNICODE support) >Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:29:29 +0100 > >> Ive been looking around the manual pages of

Re: Libc6 functions such as wprintf() (widechar/multibyte/UNICODE support)

Hi, From: Jerry Lundström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Libc6 functions such as wprintf() (widechar/multibyte/UNICODE support) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:29:29 +0100 > Ive been looking around the manual pages of wprintf and > include files of the latest potato. > Widechar/Multibyte support exist (w

Re: libc6 is too large?

On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Michael Meskes wrote: > > Fuck off and die. > > I have no idea what happened before but I strongly dislike a wording like > this. This list is a public forum and mails like Joel's do not create a good > image for Debian at all. Maybe he had PMS? Michae

Re: libc6 is too large?

On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 07:36:50AM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote: > >It's because the maintainer decided to go against the policy and not strip > >the libraries. This has already been reported as a bug against > >libc6 (#40467). > > Learn the fucking difference between strip --strip-debug and strip

Re: libc6 is too large?

At 23:06 +1000 1999-09-16, Herbert Xu wrote: It's because the maintainer decided to go against the policy and not strip the libraries. This has already been reported as a bug against libc6 (#40467). Learn the fucking difference between strip --strip-debug and strip --strip-unneeded, you clueless

Re: libc6 is too large?

On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Herbert Xu wrote: > > Version: 2.1.2-1 > > Installed-Size: 4469 > > > It is increased about 3MB! > It's because the maintainer decided to go against the policy and not strip > the libraries. This has already been reported as a bug against libc6 > (#40467). Yes, but libc6

Re: libc6 is too large?

Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From slink: > Version: 2.0.7.19981211-6 > Installed-Size: 1458 > and from potato: > Version: 2.1.2-1 > Installed-Size: 4469 > It is increased about 3MB! > I think it is not good for minimal distribution (console on > small HDD, libraries without loc

Re: Libc6 progress: 1998-01-07

On Sat, 10 Jan 1998, Joel Rosdahl wrote: > > I have already done that. It's not 0.6.3 but 0.12.3. This [...] > > Well, that's great! But what I intend to fix is afterstep, not > wmaker... ;) Oops... I read way too fast... Then both packages are fixed! :-) Marcelo -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS

Re: Libc6 progress: 1998-01-07

>> It seems that Neil hasn't worked on this package in about four >> months, so I'm preparing a non-maintainer release which should fix >> at least the mixed dependencies and bug #15395 (chmod a+x >> /etc/menu-methods/afterstep). I'll upload it soon if noone >> complains. > I have already done th

Re: Libc6 progress: 1998-01-07

On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, Joel Rosdahl wrote: > > Neil A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > afterstep-1.0-5 (Mixed dependencies) > > It seems that Neil hasn't worked on this package in about four months, > so I'm preparing a non-maintainer release which should fix at least > the mixed dependencies

Re: Libc6 progress: 1998-01-07

> Neil A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > afterstep-1.0-5 (Mixed dependencies) It seems that Neil hasn't worked on this package in about four months, so I'm preparing a non-maintainer release which should fix at least the mixed dependencies and bug #15395 (chmod a+x /etc/menu-methods/afterstep

Re: Libc6 progress: 1998-01-07

On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, Gregor Hoffleit wrote: > Neil A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > wmaker-0.6.3-1 (Mixed dependencies) > > Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is working on > WindowMaker packages based on wmaker-0.12.3. Yes. I have them ready, and some ppl have tested them. (I

Re: Libc6 progress: 1998-01-07

Neil A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: wmaker-0.6.3-1 (Mixed dependencies) Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is working on WindowMaker packages based on wmaker-0.12.3. Gregor -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Re: Libc6 progress: 1998-01-07

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Regarding "Libc6 progress: 1998-01-07" of 6:22 AM -0800 1/7/98, Richard Braakman wrote: > vgrind-5.7-10 I have uploaded a libc6 build of vgrind, and have adopted the package. - -- Joel "Espy" Klecker Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: Libc6 progress: 1998-01-07

On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Richard Braakman wrote: > This is a list of packages in the main distribution that need work to > be fully libc6-based. I base it on the Packages file at my local mirror, > so it may be a day or two out of date. If you have questions about why > a particular package is on the

Re: libc6 based gpc

No. Someone else will probably do so. I am not using pascal at all right now. On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Paolo M. Pumilia wrote: > Hi Christoph Lameter, > I am switching my linux system to hamm. > Since gcc upgraded to 2.7.2.3, it seems i cannot use > my old gpc compiler any more. Do you plan to packag

Re: libc6 is missing "swab"

well, swab() isn't a "standard" function, for one thing. It's a rarely used old-BSD bit, that people occasionally use anyway. Putting the code directly inline is probably all you can do... -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble?

Re: libc6 pine ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Gergely Madarasz wrote: > I was just informed (thanks, Che ;)) that there is a newer pine > source-only package in non-free... does it compile and work with libc6 ? It compiles, but it does not "work" (it does, but not in a multi-user environment, so installing

Re: libc6 pine ?

On Sat, 3 Jan 1998, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > You don't have to... Tell'em to use emacs... :) Just kidding, I'm using pine > on a libc6 machine, and I _think_ it's libc6... Just double checked... I'm using a libc5 pine to... sorry... Emacs is still greate... :) -

Re: libc6 pine ?

On Sat, 3 Jan 1998, Gergely Madarasz wrote: > It would be so nice to remove libc5 from one of my machines... and pine is > the only obstacle (no, i cannot tell 30 people to switch to mutt :)) You don't have to... Tell'em to use emacs... :) Just kidding, I'm using pine on a libc6 machine, and I _

Re: libc6 is missing "swab"

| On Saturday, 3 January 98, at 4:12:27 AM | Adam wrote about "libc6 is missing "swab"" > When trying to compile nfsroot for libc6, I got a implicit declaration of > swab(...). I fixed it by copying the declaration out of unistd.h. Then, > during linking, I got an undefined reference to swap(...)

Re: libc6 pine ?

On Sat, 3 Jan 1998, Gergely Madarasz wrote: Hi > I was just informed (thanks, Che ;)) that there is a newer pine > source-only package in non-free... does it compile and work with libc6 ? > I remember that a couple of months ago there were some problems with libc6 > pine, I dont know if it was c

Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28

On Sat, 3 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sun, Dec 28, 1997 at 03:47:22PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote: > > Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > perlmagick-1.15-2 > > imagemagick-3.9.0-1 > > libhdf4g-dev-4.0.2-4 (Depends on libhdf4) > > It's a strange dependency, but libhdf4 actual

Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28

On Sun, Dec 28, 1997 at 03:47:22PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote: > Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > perlmagick-1.15-2 > imagemagick-3.9.0-1 > libhdf4g-dev-4.0.2-4 (Depends on libhdf4) It's a strange dependency, but libhdf4 actually depends on libhdf4g rather than just requiring a parti

Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28

Eloy A. Paris wrote: > Hey!! Somebody give Adam an account on master!!! :-) He will port to > libc6 the remaining libc5 packages :-) Adam wrote > : I wish I had a life outside Quake. Hey Adam, you want to maintain quake too? Maybe you can port it to libc6. ;-) -- see shy jo, just kidding -- T

Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28

Hey!! Somebody give Adam an account on master!!! :-) He will port to libc6 the remaining libc5 packages :-) E.- Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : | On Sunday, 28 December 97, at 9:47:22 AM : | Richard wrote about "Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28" : > Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: : >

Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28

| On Sunday, 28 December 97, at 9:47:22 AM | Richard wrote about "Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28" > Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > wu-ftpd-2.4-27 Done. Waiting for account on master. > wu-ftpd-academ-2.4.2.13-0 Done. Waiting for account on master. > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28

Christian Leutloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Braakman) writes: > > > Alan Bain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > f2c-960717-0 (Old source format) > > isn't this obsoleted by the f77 frontend to gcc!? I believe there are still some Fortran constructions that can b

Re: Libc6 progress for contrib and non-free (Dec 1997)

Yann Dirson wrote: > Richard Braakman writes: > > non-free: xforms0.86-0.86-2 > > xmysql (contrib) is not listed, but depends on both libc6 and > xforms0.86. Ah, yes. That's a deficiency in the way I construct these lists. Packages like xmysql will not show up until there is a libc6 version o

Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-28

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Braakman) writes: > Alan Bain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > f2c-960717-0 (Old source format) isn't this obsoleted by the f77 frontend to gcc!? Bye Christian -- Christian Leutloff, Aachen, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oche.de/~leutloff/ Debian GNU/Lin

Re: Libc6 progress for contrib and non-free (Dec 1997)

Richard Braakman writes: > non-free: xforms0.86-0.86-2 xmysql (contrib) is not listed, but depends on both libc6 and xforms0.86. -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer, alt-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | support Debian GNU/Linux: debian-email

Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-12

>Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > mdutils-0.35-5(extra) I have successfully recompiled mdutils for libc6, but will have wait until another day to u/l it. I have to apply to become a maintainer, and I have stayed(sp?) up too late as it is. Adam Heath of Borg-Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] Join th

Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-12

On Fri, 12 Dec 1997, Richard Braakman wrote: > Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > wml-1.3.1-1 Hello! :) If you don't mind, mind if I give WML a try? :) (i.e. to do a non-maintainer upload of wml_1.4.5-0.1 if I manage to compile it on my computer. :) Thanks! Anthony -- Anthony F

Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-12

Richard Braakman writes: > James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > xemacs20-20.2-4 (Mixed dependencies; waiting for libcompface?) > xemacs19-19.16-1 (Mixed dependencies; waiting for libcompface?) libcompface has already been converted. -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | St

Re: Libc6 progress for contrib and non-free (Dec 1997)

> Alexander Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > contrib: ddd-dmotif-2.1.1-2 > contrib: ddd-smotif-2.1.1-2 The thing with motif-linked packages is that Motif itself is not yet available for libc6. Thanks. Alex Y. -- _ _( )_ ( (o___ +-

Re: Libc6 2.0.5c has a leak in inet_ntoa

On Wed, 10 Dec 1997, Nils Rennebarth wrote: > On 10 Dec 1997, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Yep, download libc6_2.0.6-0.2 (prerelease 2) from > > ftp://ftp.ods.com/pub/linux/ and send [EMAIL PROTECTED] an email > > with your experiences .. > > > > Has be

Re: Libc6 2.0.5c has a leak in inet_ntoa

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 10 Dec 1997, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Yep, download libc6_2.0.6-0.2 (prerelease 2) from > ftp://ftp.ods.com/pub/linux/ and send [EMAIL PROTECTED] an email > with your experiences .. > > Has been running fine here for

Re: libc6 2.0.6 coredumps portmap (was Re: Libc6 2.0.5c has a leak in inet_ntoa)

On Tue, 9 Dec 1997, David Engel wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 1997 at 12:12:21PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > more on this problem. portmap doesn't segfault on a freshly built > > hamm system (i.e. one built with bo and upgraded to hamm immediately > > a few days ago - which is acting as an NFS serv

Re: Libc6 progress: 1997-12-06

'Hamish Moffatt wrote:' > >> Chris Fearnley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> dome-4.60-1 > >Compiled fine but appears to segfault on execution. Hmm, are there problems with g++? I'll be upgrading to hamm RSN and hope to have time before the code freeze to deal with this ... -- Christopher J. Fearnley

Re: libc6 2.0.6 coredumps portmap (was Re: Libc6 2.0.5c has a leak in inet_ntoa)

On Wed, Dec 10, 1997 at 12:12:21PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > more on this problem. portmap doesn't segfault on a freshly built hamm > system (i.e. one built with bo and upgraded to hamm immediately a few days > ago - which is acting as an NFS server, exporting a mirror of debian to > the local

  1   2   >