Re: Packaging homeassistant in Debian

2024-07-26 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 17302 March 1977, Thomas Goirand wrote: Using HA myself, that thing and all around it is changing faster than anything else I ever saw. One basically finished updating ones install and it goes again "Update available". That's part of my motivation for having HA in Debian: I hate that it wa

Re: Packaging homeassistant in Debian

2024-07-26 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi Joerg, Thanks for voicing your opinion. On 7/26/24 15:25, Joerg Jaspert wrote: Not going to stop you - I actually think it would be a nice thing to have something like this packaged for real - but how realistic is this in a Debian stable release (assuming you ever manage to get all of it pac

Re: Packaging homeassistant in Debian

2024-07-26 Thread Yogeswaran Umasankar
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 03:25:09PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 17302 March 1977, Thomas Goirand wrote: Together with a bunch of people during debcamp, we decided to package homeassistant. This is a huge task, with hundreds of dependencies. Since there's too many, we've been told to no Cc:

Re: Packaging homeassistant in Debian

2024-07-26 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 17302 March 1977, Thomas Goirand wrote: Together with a bunch of people during debcamp, we decided to package homeassistant. This is a huge task, with hundreds of dependencies. Since there's too many, we've been told to no Cc: debian-devel@l.d.o when filing the ITPs, and instead write a su

Re: Packaging homeassistant in Debian

2024-07-26 Thread Gard Spreemann
Hi! Thomas Goirand writes: > Dear friends, > > Together with a bunch of people during debcamp, we decided to package > homeassistant. This is a huge task, with hundreds of > dependencies. Since there's too many, we've been told to no Cc: > debian-devel@l.d.o when filing the ITPs, and instead wri

Packaging homeassistant in Debian

2024-07-25 Thread Thomas Goirand
Dear friends, Together with a bunch of people during debcamp, we decided to package homeassistant. This is a huge task, with hundreds of dependencies. Since there's too many, we've been told to no Cc: debian-devel@l.d.o when filing the ITPs, and instead write a summary (as per developper's ref