Hi,
due to lack of time, I intend to give a couple of packages up for adoption:
* remmina (#676894)
* libvncserver (#676895)
The latter is a (build-)dependency of the first, so you may want to
have a look at both if you are interested in maintaining them.
Cheers,
Luca
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
I'm asking for adopters for the following packages:
* boa-constructor http://bugs.debian.org/575844
* drpython http://bugs.debian.org/575845
* foff http://bugs.debian.org/575842
* jokosher http://bugs.debian.org/575843
* lfm http:/
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 06:38:03PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> These 3 are still up for adoption:
>
> > * gnus
> > * gimp-dimage-color
> > * xloadimage
Is there any reason to keep xloadimage around? From what I can tell,
xli is a fork of it that saw some more development but both seem to be
d
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The following packages are up for adoption:
Please note I said adoption, not orphaned.
> * gawk
> * mawk
> * gawk-doc (non-free)
Steve Langasek is taking these 3.
> * quinn-diff
Luk Claes is taking this.
(Roger, I'm afraid I don't have a vers
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:32:27PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
> >> so those are for him.
>
> > Where by "NMU" you mean "made an improper upload claiming to be the
> > maintainer of a package that was not up
Steve Langasek wrote:
>> arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
>> so those are for him.
> Where by "NMU" you mean "made an improper upload claiming to be the
> maintainer of a package that was not up for adoption"?
If he did not talk to James first, that is pretty bad and Ja
Le Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:15:01PM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
>
> > The following packages are up for adoption:
>
> > * gawk
> > * mawk
> > * gawk-doc (non-free)
>
> I would be willing to take these three.
Hi all,
those pac
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following packages are up for adoption:
>
> * p0f
>
Hi,
I'd like to take this one.
Cheers,
Pierre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>and one a month old,
>>
>>An upstream contributor promised to fix it and I'm waiting for a patch to
>>test the fix.
> There is a workaround and the RC bug could be downgraded to important.
No. Having a workaround in the bug log is not somethin
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:42:12AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > The following packages are up for adoption:
> > * gawk
> > * gawk-doc (non-free)
> arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
> so those are f
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> The following packages are up for adoption:
> * gawk
> * mawk
> * gawk-doc (non-free)
I would be willing to take these three.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:41:20AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> James Troup wrote:
>
> > * quinn-diff
>
> I would like to take this one.
Is this worth integrating with sbuild.git? Feel free to add it as part
of the buildd-tools project on Alioth in either case, since it's needed
by wanna-build.
hello,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
>
> The following packages are up for adoption:
>
> * gawk
> * gawk-doc (non-free)
arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
so those are for him.
thanks
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:23:03AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:13:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>You currently have two RC bugs open on two base packages that you maintain,
>>one a year old
>
>For that one, upstream didn't reply at all when asked about tha
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:13:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>You currently have two RC bugs open on two base packages that you maintain,
>one a year old
For that one, upstream didn't reply at all when asked about that issue
>and one a month old,
An upstream contributor promised to fix it and
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:30:48AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > * gdbm
> > * mawk
> I'll would like to take gdbm mawk
You currently have two RC bugs open on two base packages that you maintain,
one a year old and one a mo
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, James Troup wrote:
> * gnupg-doc
I'll take care of this one.
Don Armstrong
--
I leave the show floor, but not before a pack of caffeinated Jolt gum
is thrust at me by a hyperactive girl screaming, "Chew more! Do more!"
The American will to consume more and produce more pe
James Troup wrote:
> * quinn-diff
I would like to take this one.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:46:33PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> * gdbm
> * mawk
I'll would like to take gdbm mawk
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
The following packages are up for adoption:
* gawk
* gdbm
* gimp-dimage-color
* gnupg-doc
* gnus
* mawk
* p0f
* quinn-diff
* xloadimage
* gawk-doc (non-free)
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Serafeim.
>>
>> > archivemail
>
> Anibal, funny as it may sound, would you mind letting archivemail to me? You
> can still have the rest :) (or else just ignore this email)
Ok, go ahead.
archivemail is written on Python. I'm expert on C/C++.
I
David Watson wrote:
> I'll take rss2email if no one else wants to.
Ok, you have it. Good luck!
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
> them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
>
> rss2email
I'll take rss2email if no one else wants to.
--
David Watson - Debian GNU/Linux Developer
[EMAIL
Hi Michael,
Michael Meskes wrote:
> Sorry guys, apparently this email of mine didn't make it to the list.
> Thus sending it again. Need to figure out what's going on as this
> happened twice.
>
> Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 20:53:51 schrieb Joey Hess:
>> I'll no longer be maintaining the following
Bart Martens wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 13:36 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Bart Martens wrote:
> > > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
> > > > them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
>
* Lars Wirzenius [Thu, 22 May 2008 07:59:26 +0300]:
> Is acpi better than acpitool?
My love will go to whichever uses /sys first. (#462305 and #463111)
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:59:55AM -0500, Anibal Avelar wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi Joey.
>
> Im' very interested to adopt this packages:
>
> > archivemail
Anibal, funny as it may sound, would you mind letting
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 13:36 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Bart Martens wrote:
> > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
> > > them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
> > >
> > > aalib
> >
> > I'l
Bart Martens wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
> > them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
> >
> > aalib
>
> I'll adopt aalib.
Both you and Anibal want this, so work something out
Anibal Avelar wrote:
> Im' very interested to adopt this packages:
>
> > archivemail
> > splitvt - I use it.
> > unclutter - I use it.
> > xaoom ? I think would be xzoom?
Yes, xzoom.
Ok, please upload new versions with you as maintainer, and a few of
these have unreleased changes for debhelp
Michael Meskes wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 20:53:51 schrieb Joey Hess:
> > I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
> > them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
> > ...
> > acpi
>
> I take this one. Hmm, thinking about it, I wonder
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
> them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
>
> aalib
I'll adopt aalib.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joey.
Im' very interested to adopt this packages:
> archivemail
> splitvt - I use it.
> unclutter - I use it.
> xaoom ? I think would be xzoom?
Regards.
- --
Anibal Avelar (FixXxeR) http://fixxxer.cc
GPG: 83B64656 - C143 4AD8 B017 53FA B74
to, 2008-05-22 kello 04:35 +0200, Michael Meskes kirjoitti:
> Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 20:53:51 schrieb Joey Hess:
> > I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
> > them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
> > ...
> > acpi
>
> I take this
Sorry guys, apparently this email of mine didn't make it to the list.
Thus sending it again. Need to figure out what's going on as this
happened twice.
Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 20:53:51 schrieb Joey Hess:
> I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
> them next week an
I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
aalib
acpi
analog
archivemail
fbreader (and liblinebreak, a dependency)
grepmail (whoever takes this will probably want to be on the perl team,
it'
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:52:41PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:25:26PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> >* flawfinder
> >* pscan
>
> As I haven't gotten around to do too much audit work, I'll at least take
> care of a few audit tools: flawfinder and psca
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:25:26PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
>* flawfinder
>* pscan
As I haven't gotten around to do too much audit work, I'll at least take
care of a few audit tools: flawfinder and pscan. It seems rats already
has a new maintainer...
Cheers, Uwe.
--
Uwe Herma
* Steve Kemp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
> I've recently orphaned all my packages whilst being on a
> bit of hiatus from project work.
[...]
> Several packages are still unclaimed, although people have
> offered on some of them. Please take a look at the list if
> you're interested:
[...]
>*
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 21:25, Steve Kemp wrote:
> I've recently orphaned all my packages whilst being on a
> bit of hiatus from project work.
>
>* driftnet
>* dsniff
I'll take driftnet. What would a network admin do without it? ;)
I saw that Christian Kujau showed interest in dsniff
I've recently orphaned all my packages whilst being on a
bit of hiatus from project work.
Several packages are still unclaimed, although people have
offered on some of them. Please take a look at the list if
you're interested:
* debian-builder[O][O]
* driftnet
* dsniff
* fla
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hmm, I've looked over the packages mentioned above, and none of the others
> seem to be removable. I think someone's been sneaking new GNOME1 packages
> into the archive when I wasn't looking. :)
>
> libcapplet is closest, only python-gnome-1.2 as a reverse-dep after the
reassign 385417 ftp.debian.org
retitle 385417 RM: gwrapguile -- RoQA; orphaned, obsolete library
thanks
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-27 15:39]:
> > > I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages:
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-27 15:39]:
> > I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages:
> > bonobo gal0.x gnome-libs gnome-print gtkhtml gwrapguile imlib
> > libcapplet libglade oaf
> gwrapguile and gtkhtml have no reverse-dependencies in Debian except for
>
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, May 27, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>python-gnome has a build-dependency on libgtkhtml-dev which
>> should be trivially removable since none of its binary packages use it.
>
> python-gnome is also deprecated and should go away when po
On Sat, May 27, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
>python-gnome has a build-dependency on libgtkhtml-dev which
> should be trivially removable since none of its binary packages use it.
python-gnome is also deprecated and should go away when possible, I've
filed bugs on the rdeps already.
* Thomas Bushnell BSG [Sat, 27 May 2006 15:49:41 -0700]:
Hi Thomas,
> (indeed, whenever I use rdepends I get a lot of
> spurious entries, and I don't know why, and it requires gobs of manual
> work to figure out which ones are real).
One scenario in which it does not work:
http://chistera.yi.
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 12:00:43PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
>> I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages:
>
>> bonobo gal0.x gnome-libs gnome-print gtkhtml gwrapguile imlib
>> libcapplet libglade oaf
>
> gwrapguile an
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 12:00:43PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages:
> bonobo gal0.x gnome-libs gnome-print gtkhtml gwrapguile imlib
> libcapplet libglade oaf
gwrapguile and gtkhtml have no reverse-dependencies in Debian excep
I have been maintaining the following gnome-1 support packages:
bonobo gal0.x gnome-libs gnome-print gtkhtml gwrapguile imlib
libcapplet libglade oaf
I have been doing so because gnucash (which I maintain) was the last
major gnome-1 package, and the gnome maintainers (quite reasonably)
did n
Hi,
I am putting the following (source) packages up for adoption:
- tilp: TI calculator <-> PC communication program for X
- tiemu: Texas Instruments calculators emulator
- skinedit: skin editor for TiEmu
- tidev-modules: Sources for drivers for Texas Instruments calculators link
cable
On 15:03 Sun 11 Dec 2005, George Wright wrote:
> * on Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:21:28PM +1000, Bradley Marshall wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if this is the right process to follow, so please
> > let me know if there's something else I should be doing.
>
> ditto for me - shall I fill in an ITA? I'm not
* on Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:21:28PM +1000, Bradley Marshall wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the right process to follow, so please
> let me know if there's something else I should be doing.
ditto for me - shall I fill in an ITA? I'm not a DD and am unsure as to how to
proceed.
> There's not
Hi all,
I've not had as much time to devote to Debian as I'd like,
so in all fairness I'm offering my packages up for adoption
so they can be looked after better than I've got time for.
I'm not sure if this is the right process to follow, so please
let me know if there&
On May 19, 2005 08:24 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > 7. gwydion-dylan -- Dynamic Language
> > > 8. gwydion-dylan-sgml -- SGML documentation package
> > > for Dylang.
> > > 9. libopengl-dylan -- OpenGL binding for Dylan.
> > > 10. libpng-dylan -- PNG binding for Dylan.
I guess I could take
On Thursday 19 May 2005 13:24, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> anyone interested?
>
> > > 2. Erlang -- Concurrent programming language
> > > 3. erlang-doc-html -- HTML documentation for Erlang.
> > > 4. erlang-manpages -- Manpages for Erlang.
These are taken by François-Denis Gonthier.
> > > 5. w
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 22:29]:
> Brent Fulgham has decided to give some packages away (mostly Erlang
> and Dylan related packages but also some others); the following
> mail is forwarded with permission from debian-private:
anyone interested?
> > 2. Erlang -- Concurre
On May 4, 2005 05:29 pm, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > 2. Erlang -- Concurrent programming language
> > 3. erlang-doc-html -- HTML documentation for Erlang.
> > 4. erlang-manpages -- Manpages for Erlang.
Oh Oh! I want those.
I'm not a DD (yet) though are they much work to maintain?
--
To UNS
Brent Fulgham has decided to give some packages away (mostly Erlang
and Dylan related packages but also some others); the following
mail is forwarded with permission from debian-private:
* Brent Fulgham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-30 09:44]:
> I find that after seven years of working on Debian (a
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:46:18PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
> >I'm interrested onm co-maintaining lvm2 and device-mapper.
> As am I - we use these heavily on some fairly serious kit at work, so I
> can justify the time... co-maintaining sounds like a sensible thing to
> do.
Okay, I requested a pr
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 02:08:44PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:11:50PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
> > How should we coordinate this?
>
> Alioth is used for many debian work, so this should be sufficient.
>
Even more when it will stabilize itself :) We are all awating fo
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:11:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Patrick, it might even be worth all 4 of us maintaining all the LVM
> related packages (throwing lvm10 in with the rest), since Tim uses
> multipath-tools, and none of us care much for lvm10.
There is no debian kernel which lacks su
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:11:50PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
> How should we coordinate this?
Alioth is used for many debian work, so this should be sufficient.
Bastian
--
Spock: We suffered 23 casualties in that attack, Captain.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:11:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> My recommendation would be an LVM alioth project, w/ a svn or arch
> (preferred) repository. I've kept track of lvm2 stuff in arch for a
> number of years, it has worked well.
>
> Patrick, it might even be worth all 4 of us main
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:11:50 +, Tim Cutts wrote:
>
> On 18 Jan 2005, at 4:06 pm, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:46:18PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17 Jan 2005, at 5:42 pm, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:28:56AM +, Patrick Caulfi
On 18 Jan 2005, at 4:06 pm, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:46:18PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
On 17 Jan 2005, at 5:42 pm, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:28:56AM +, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
lvm2 - in active development, upstream helpful but often
busy.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:46:18PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
>
> On 17 Jan 2005, at 5:42 pm, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:28:56AM +, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> >>lvm2- in active development, upstream helpful but often
> >>busy.
> >>device-mapper - larg
On 17 Jan 2005, at 5:42 pm, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:28:56AM +, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
lvm2 - in active development, upstream helpful but often busy.
device-mapper - largely stable. occasional releases.
lvm10 - stable. no more upstream development at a
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:28:56AM +, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> lvm2 - in active development, upstream helpful but often busy.
> device-mapper - largely stable. occasional releases.
> lvm10 - stable. no more upstream development at all.
> lvm-common - native package. sm
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:28:56 +, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> What with a change of circumstances and lack of time recently I don't honestly
> think I'm doing a good enough job on the LVM packages, so I'm offering them up
> for adoption to anyone who thinks they can do a better job.
>
> The pack
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 09:28 +, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> What with a change of circumstances and lack of time recently I don't honestly
> think I'm doing a good enough job on the LVM packages, so I'm offering them up
> for adoption to anyone who thinks they can do a better job.
>
> The packag
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> What with a change of circumstances and lack of time recently I don't honestly
> think I'm doing a good enough job on the LVM packages, so I'm offering them up
> for adoption to anyone who thinks they can do a better job.
And please, whomever get it,
What with a change of circumstances and lack of time recently I don't honestly
think I'm doing a good enough job on the LVM packages, so I'm offering them up
for adoption to anyone who thinks they can do a better job.
The packages are:
lvm2- in active development, upstream helpful but
egards
Fine by me. As far as I can tell you're not a DD or in the NM queue, so
you will need to find a sponsor. I'd offer, put the purpose of putting
these packages up for adoption is removing the need for me to spend any
more time on them. :D
Regards,
Rob
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 08:48:46AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> I'd take tcpflow if it's not already been claimed, it nicely
> comliments dsniff which I already have.
>
> Steve
It's yours.
Regards,
Rob
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:39:54PM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote:
> Just a brief note to draw people's attention to the following RFAs
> I filed a few days ago:
> #193116 ap-utils -- Access Point SNMP Utils for Linux
> #193117 igal -- online image gallery generator
> #193118 tcpflow -- TCP flow re
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:39:54PM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote:
> Just a brief note to draw people's attention to the following RFAs
> I filed a few days ago:
> #193116 ap-utils -- Access Point SNMP Utils for Linux
> #193117 igal -- online image gallery generator
> #193118 tcpflow -- TCP flow re
Just a brief note to draw people's attention to the following RFAs
I filed a few days ago:
#193116 ap-utils -- Access Point SNMP Utils for Linux
#193117 igal -- online image gallery generator
#193118 tcpflow -- TCP flow recorder
Please see the bugs for more information about the status of each
Hi.
I've just orphaned the following packages, because I don't use these
anymore.
x11/xipmsg:
XIP Messenger is a pop up style message communication software.
x11/wmitime:
yet another clock dock app for Window Maker
editors/yc-el:
Yet another Canna client for Emacsen.
I uploaded packages as
*- Vincent Renardias wrote about "Re: fvwm{,2,-common} packages up for adoption"
> On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Austin Donnelly wrote:
>
>> I am (in theory) still maintaining the following packages:
>>
>> fvwm
>> fvwm2
>> fvwm-common
>> xloadimag
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> I am (in theory) still maintaining the following packages:
>
> fvwm
> fvwm2
> fvwm-common
> xloadimage
> xcal
>
> In practice, I haven't uploaded new versions of these for many months.
I volunteer to adotp fvwm2 & fvwm-common.
(I already began to wo
Hi,
I am (in theory) still maintaining the following packages:
fvwm
fvwm2
fvwm-common
xloadimage
xcal
In practice, I haven't uploaded new versions of these for many months.
Both xcal and xloadimage have few outstanding bugs. fvwm2 has many
outstanding bugs, some of which are in reality either
I sent this yesterday, but since I never got a copy back, it may have
gotten lost with the list move.
I hate to add to the growing number of orphaned packages, but I
currently barely (if even that) have time to maintain the packages I'm
really interested in. As a result, I'm officially putting up
I hate to add to the growing number of orphaned packages, but I
currently barely (if even that) have time to maintain the packages I'm
really interested in. As a result, I'm officially putting up for
adoption the packages I took over on an interim basis much too long
ago when they were originally
84 matches
Mail list logo
