On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:46:18PM +0000, Tim Cutts wrote: > > On 17 Jan 2005, at 5:42 pm, Bastian Blank wrote: > > >On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:28:56AM +0000, Patrick Caulfield wrote: > >>lvm2 - in active development, upstream helpful but often > >>busy. > >>device-mapper - largely stable. occasional releases. > >>lvm10 - stable. no more upstream development at all. > >>lvm-common - native package. small number of bugs need sorting > >>out > >>multipath-tools - in active development, upstream very helpful. > > > >I'm interrested onm co-maintaining lvm2 and device-mapper. > > As am I - we use these heavily on some fairly serious kit at work, so I > can justify the time... co-maintaining sounds like a sensible thing to > do. >
So how about you three co-maintain lvm2 & devmapper (and maybe lvm-common ? it's as much part of LVM as the lvm2 package really), and I'll hang onto lvm10 & multipath. -- patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
