On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > Michal ?iha? writes:
> >> Dne Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:10:24 +0300
> >> Peter Eisentraut napsal(a):
> >>
> >>> Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
> >>> which automatically updates config.{sub,gue
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Michal Čihař writes:
>
>> Dne Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:10:24 +0300
>> Peter Eisentraut napsal(a):
>>
>>> Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
>>> which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}.
>> If you don't build depend on autotools-de
Michal Čihař writes:
> Dne Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:10:24 +0300
> Peter Eisentraut napsal(a):
>
>> Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
>> which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}.
>
> If you don't build depend on autotools-dev, nothing can be updated (at
>
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:10:46PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > (Maybe it's time to get rid of the autoconf2.13 package
> > altogether, come to think of it.)
>
> It's still needed for just about everything put out by Mozilla, alas
> (iceweasel et al, obviously, but also libns
Ben Pfaff wrote:
> (Maybe it's time to get rid of the autoconf2.13 package
> altogether, come to think of it.)
It's still needed for just about everything put out by Mozilla, alas
(iceweasel et al, obviously, but also libnspr and libnss, which are
not just used by moz.org applications). There is
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Michal ??iha?? wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut napsal(a):
>>> Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
>>> which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}.
>> If you don't build depend on autotools-dev, nothi
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Michal ??iha?? wrote:
> Dne Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:10:24 +0300
> Peter Eisentraut napsal(a):
>
> > Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
> > which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}.
>
> If you don't build depend on autotools-dev, noth
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:15:18 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> Would be nice to move this port to debian-ports.org IMO, since the
> debian-ports wanna-build is already linked from the PTS.
This is the plan eventually, but at the moment we still rely on cross
built packages, so I figured it would be best
Hi
Dne Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:10:24 +0300
Peter Eisentraut napsal(a):
> Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
> which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}.
If you don't build depend on autotools-dev, nothing can be updated (at
least it was case for my packa
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Like lintian, your list falsely includes packages that use cdbs to build,
> which automatically updates config.{sub,guess}.
There doesn't seem to be a bug on lintian about this, please file one.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/Pa
On Saturday 25 April 2009 02:51:40 Bradley Smith wrote:
> In light of the recent outdated config.{sub,guess} discussion I have
> decided to generate a list[0] of packages that have these files from before
> June 2006, which is when the AVR32 architecture was added.
> The list was generated using l
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Speaking of which, where can one read more about that port? Are there
> build logs available (one might want to ease your task and keep an eye
> on them for some given packages at least)?
http://avr32.debian.net/
http://ftp-avr32.debian.n
Bradley Smith (25/04/2009):
> In light of the recent outdated config.{sub,guess} discussion I have
> decided to generate a list[0] of packages that have these files from
> before June 2006, which is when the AVR32 architecture was added.
Speaking of which, where can one read more about that port?
Bradley Smith writes:
> The list was generated using lintian 2.2.9 with this[1] patch. It is
> obviously possible that there are false positives in this list since the
> files might be not be actually used in the build, or they are copied from
> the host on clean etc. Please let me know if this i
Hi,
In light of the recent outdated config.{sub,guess} discussion I have
decided to generate a list[0] of packages that have these files from before
June 2006, which is when the AVR32 architecture was added. The number
of affected packages comes to 620, and obviously filing 620 bugs seems
like the
15 matches
Mail list logo
